Abstract (2. Language): 
This paper aims to focus on neostructuralism in case of Latin America on the basis of competitiveness and rivalry in order to analyze the influences of Schumpeterian approaches. Considering the historical evolution of structuralism to neostructuralism, growth with equity and systematic competitiveness have been defined as the main pillars of neostructuralism. Regarding Schumpeterian vision of economic development, innovation and entrepreneur, how these concepts have been used within neostructuralist approaches based on growth with equity and systematic competitiveness would tried to be answered. Within this context it is clearly seen that Schumpeterian approaches have a direct influence on neostructuralism.
Özet (Orjinal Dil): 
Bu çalısma, Latin Amerika’da neoyapısalcı okulun rekabet edebilirlik kavramını temel alarak Schumpeterci yaklasıma bakısını analiz etmeye odaklanıyor. Tarihsel süreç içerisinde yapısalcı yaklasımların neoyapısalcı yaklasımlara evrildiği görülürken, adil büyüme ile sistematik rekabet edebilirlik kavramları neoyapısalcı okulum temelleri olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Schumpeterci yaklasımların iktisadi kalkınma, innovasyon ve girisimci kavramları dikkate alınarak, bu kavramların neoyapısalcı okulun temellerini olusturan adil büyüme ile sistematik rekabet edebilirlik içerisinde ne sekilde kullanıldığına yanıtlar üretmeye çalısmaktadır. Çalısma kapsamında neoyapısalcı analizin Schumpeterci yaklasımlardan doğrudan etkilendiği açık bir sekilde görülmektedir.

ALTIMIR O.(1990); “ Development, crisis and
equity”, Cepal Review, No: 40, LC/G.1613-P, Santiago,
BIELSCHOWSKY Ricardo (2009); “Sixty
years of ECLAC: structuralism and neo-structuralism”,
Cepal Review , No:97, April 2009, pp.171-192.
CIMOLI Mario and KATZ Jorge(2001);
“Structural Reforms Technological Gaps and Economic
Development. A Latin American Perspective”,DRUID-Nelson and Winter conference papers,
pdf, Access at 20.03. 2011.
ECLAC(1990); “Changing Production Patterns
with Equity”, http://www.cepal.org/publicaciones
/xml/8/4708/lcg1601i.html, Access at 2.01.2011.
ECLAC(1992); “Social Equity and Changing
Production Patterns: An Integrated Approach”
lcg1701i.html, Acess at 12.02. 2011.
ECLAC(2000);“Globalization and Development
”, http://www.eclac.org/cgi-bin/getProd. asp?xml=/
publicaciones/xml/0/10030/P10030.xml, Access at
2.02. 2011.
ECLAC(2004);“Productive development in
Open Economies” http://www.eclac.org/publicaciones
/xml/4/15134/DGI-2247-SES30-4summary.pdf, Acess
at 10 January 2011
ECLAC(2010); “Latin America Poverty and
Extreme Poverty”, http://www.eclac.cl/prensa/noticias
Y_AND_EXTREME_POVERTY.pdf, Access at 12
February 2011.
ESSER, K. and others (1996); “Systemic
competitiveness: a new challenge for firms and for
government”, Cepal Review , No: 59, August 1996,
pp. 39-53.
FFRENCH -DAVIS Ricardo (2007); “Growth
Challenges For Latin America Reforms What Has
Happened, Why and How to Reform Them”,
ments/CaseStudies/Paper%20Ffrench-Davis.pdf, Access
at 25.04. 2011.
GOMA Oscar Muñoz (1993); “The process of
industrialization : theories, experiences, and policies “,
in Development from Within: Toward a
Neostructuralist Approach for Latin America,.
Osvaldo SUNKEL (ed.), Boulder: Lynne Rienner
Publishers, pp. 257–85.
HANUSCH Horst and PYKA Andreas( 2005); “
Principles of non-Schumpeterian economics”,
Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsieneine”, http://www.
servppin.com/pdfs/hanusch_y_Pyka_2005.pdf, Acess
at 5 May 2011.
HOFMAN André and TORRES Miguel (2008);
“ECLAC Thinking in the Cepal Review(1976-2008)”,
Cepal Review, No:96, pp.9-26.
KATZ Jorge (2000); “Structural change and labor
productivity growth in Latin American manufacturing
industries”, World Development, 28 (953). pp.
KNIGHT P. and MARQUES R.(2008) ;
“Closing the Technology Gap”, in. Can Latin
America Compete? Confronting the Challenges of
Globalization,”Edited by Jerry HAAR and John
PRICE , Palgrave , Macmillan, pp.99-121.
LEIVA Fernando Ignacio(2008); “Latin
American Neostructuralism: The Contradictions of
Post-Neoliberal Development”, Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press, 315 pages.
LOVE Joseph L.(1980); “Raúl Prebisch and the
Origins of the Doctrine of Unequal Exchange,” Latin
American Research Review, 15 : 45–72.
LOVE Joseph L.(2005);"The rise and fall of
Structuralism", inc. Economic Doctrines in Latin
America,Origins, Embedding and Evolution, Valpy
FITZ GERALD and Rosemary THROP(edt.) Palgrave
Macmillan, pp.157-182.
LOVE Joseph L.(2005); “The Rise and Decline
of Economic Structuralism in Latin America:
New Dimensions”, Latin American Research
Review, 40: 3, pp. 100-125.
OCAMPO José Antonio (2000); “Globalization
and Development”, http://www.bndes.gov.br /Site
s/conhecimento/seminario/novosrumos_Ocampo.pdf ,
Access at 4 .02. 2011.
OCAMPO José Antonio (2001); “Raul Prebisch
and the development agenda at the dawn of the twentyfirst
century”, Cepal Review, No. 75, December 2001,
OCAMPO José Antonio (2002); “Structural
dynamics and economic development”, http://www .newschool.edu/scepa/originalsite/papers/workshop/oca
mpo_200402.pdf, Access at:2.01.2011
OCAMPO José Antonio (2004); “Lights and
shadows in Latin American structural reforms”, (in)
Economic Reforms Growth and Inequality in Latin
America: Essays in Honor of Albert Berry, Gustavo
INDART (ed.), Aldershot, Ashgate,
ts_Shadows_Reform_Latin_America.pdf, Access at:
OCAMPO J. A. (2005); “Latin America and the
World Economy in the Long Twentieth Century,” The
Great Divergence: Hegemony, Uneven Development,
and Global Inequality(edt.), Jomo, K. S., New Delhi:
The Oxford University Press.
OECD (2010); “OECD Factbook 2010
Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics” ,
18147364, Access at 10.05.2011.
RAMOS J., and OSVALDO S.(1993);” Toward
a neostructuralist synthesis”, in Osvaldo Sunkel (ed.)
Development from Within: Toward a Neostructuralist
Approach for Latin America, Boulder, CO:
Lynne Rienner, pp. 5-22.
REISMAN David(2004); ”Schumpeter’s Market,
Enterprise and Evolution” , EE Publishing,
London, 283 pages.
RODRIGUEZ Ennio (1993); “The
endogenization of technological change : a
development challenge”,in O. Sunkel (ed.),
Development from Within: Toward a
Neostructuralist Approach for Latin America,.
Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, pp.223-256.
ROSALES V., O. (1994); Industrial policy and
promotion of competitiveness, Cepal Review, No: 53,
SCHUMPETER Joseph A.(1962); The theory
of economic development, Oxford University Press,
212 pages.
SUNKEL O. (1989); “Structuralism,
Dependency and Institutionalism: An Exploration of
Common Ground andDisparities” Journal of
Economic Issues, 23:2, pp. 519-533
SUNKEL O.(1993); “From Inward-Looking
Development to Development from Within,” in
Development from Within: Toward a
Neostructuralist Approach for Latin America edt.
O. SUNKELBoulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, pp.
SUNKEL O. and G. ZULETA (1990); “Neostructuralism
versus neoliberalism in the 1990s”, Cepal
Review, No. 42, LC/G.1642-P, December, Santiago,
SWEDERBERG R.(1993); “Joseph A.
Schumpeter : his life and work”, Cambridge, UK :
Polity Press., 293 pages.
World Intellectural Property Organization
(WIPO, 2010); “ World Intellectual Property Indicators
2010”,http://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/statistics/ patents
/, Access at 2.06.2011.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com