You are here

Home » Content

Sürekli Ayaktan Periton Diyalizi Uygulanan Çocuklarda Evde İzlemin Peritonit Görülme Sıklığına Etkisi

Effects of Home Visits to Frequency of Peritonitis in Children with Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

Journal Name:

  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Hemşirelik Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study aims to determine the effect of reguler observation at home and education on the peritonitis frequency for the children with chronic renal failure who take peritoneal dialysis at home. The survey was carried out in the pediatric nephrology units of three University hospital in Ankara. 14 patients who live in Ankara and take SAPD treatment at the time of the research constituted the experimental group whereas another 14 patients who lives outside Ankara and who have similar socio-demographical characteristics constituted the control group For the patients in the experimental group, nursing care has been provided during the home visits towards the catheter exit-side, bag changing practices and the charactristics of changing room. Patients in the control group did not receive any nursing care except the routine interventions that were performed at hospital. Percentage, correllation analysis methots were used in order to analysis the data. At the end of the research, it was found that the rate of peritonitis for research group was %21.4 and % 50 for control group.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Araştırma, kronik böbrek yetmezliği tanısı ile evde periton diyalizi uygulanan çocuklarda evde düzenli izlem ve eğitimin peritonit görülme sıklığına etkisini belirlemek amacıyla deneysel olarak yapılmıştır. Araştırma Ankara’daki üç Üniversite Hastanesinin pediatrik nefroloji ünitelerinde yapılmıştır. Bu dönemde SAPD ile tedavi gören ve Ankara’da oturan 14 hasta deney grubunu, Ankara dışında oturan ve sosyo-demografik özellikleri deney grubuna benzer olan 14 hasta kontrol grubunu oluşturmuştur. Deney grubundaki hastalara ev ziyaretleri yapılarak, değişim odasının özellikleri, kateter çıkış yerinin bakımı ve torba değişim uygulamalarına yönelik hemşirelik bakımı verilmiştir. Kontrol grubundaki hastalara ise hastanede uygulanan düzenli uygulama dışında bir uygulama yapılmamıştır. Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde yüzdelik ve korelasyon analizi yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma süresi sonunda peritonit görülme oranı deney grubunda % 21,4 iken kontrol grubunda % 50 olarak belirlenmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-surekli-ayaktan-periton-diyalizi-uygulanan-cocuklarda-evde-izlemin-peritonit-gorulme-sikligina-etkisi.pdf
  • 2
1-11
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Clements DB, Copelant LG, Loftus M. Criticall times for familly with a chronically ill child. Pediatric
Nursing 1990; l6(2):157-161.
2. Çavuşoğlu H. Çocuk Sağlığı Hemşireliği Cilt 1. Genişletilmiş 8. Baskı. Ankara: Sistem Ofset Basımevi
Tesisleri;2004. s.71.
3. Grassmann A, Gioberge S, Moeller S, Brown G. ESRD patients in 2004: global overview of patient
numbers, treatment modalities and associated trends. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005,
20(12):2587-2593.
4. http/www. saglık.gov.tr Accessed: 22.06.2006.
5. Wong DL. Eaton MH.. Wong’s Essentials of Pediatric Nursing. 6th Edition.USA: Mosby Company;2001.
s.1056-1057.
6. Ribby KJ, Cox KR. Organization and development of a pediatric and stage disease teaching protocol
for peritoneal dialysis. Pediatric Nursing 1997; (23): 4393-399.
7. San A. Ülkemizde Diyaliz ve Transplantasyon. Anadolu Böbrek Vakfı Sağlık Eğitim Araştırma
Merkezi Vakıf Yayını. Ankara:2000.
8. Gilman C. Peritoneal dialysis as the treatment of choice for pediatric patients. CAPD is the best
modality for children. Nephrology NursingJournal: Journal of the American Nephrology Nurses’
Association. (Nephrol Nurs J) 2006; 33(2): 219-20.
9. Bayhan S. Çocuklarda peritoneal diyaliz ve hemşirelik bakımı. Türk Hemşireler Dergisi 1996;
45(7):15-18.
10. Matto TK, Flotes EM. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in children a saudi experience.
Dialysis and Tansplantation 1994; 23(3): 129-144.
11. Önen K. The evaluation of nephrology, dialysis and transplant in Turkey: A short history. Diyaliz
Transplantasyon ve Yanık 1995; 8(2): 60-61.
12. Salusky IB, Hollaway M, Kuizon BD. Peritoneal dialysis in children: Issues for the 21st century
Peritoneal Dialysis International 1999; 19(2): 484-488.
13. Allen R, Nissenson MD. Measuring managing and improving quality in the end stage renal disease
treatment setting peritoneal dialysis. American Journal of Kidney Disease 1994; 24(2): 368-375.
14. Gokal R. Peritoneal dialysis: Global update. Peritoneal Dialysis Intemational 1999; 19(2): 11-15.
15. Kavvaguchi Y. Present status of CAPD in Japan. Amerikan Journey of Kiney Diseases 1998; 32(2):
xlix-lii.
16. Dönmez O, Aladag S, Cigerdelen N, Kocak S. Outcome in children on chronic peritoneal dialysis.
Advances in Peritoneal Dialysis 2003; (19): 269–72.
17. Schleifer CR. Nursing home dialysis: Can we meet the challenge. Peritoneal Dialysis Intemational
1997; (17): 234-235.
18. Yinnon AM, Gabay D, Raveh D, Schlesinger Y, Slotki I, Attias D, Rudensky B. Comparison of
peritoneal fluid culture results from adults and childen undergoing CAPD Peritoneal Dialysis
International 1999; 19(1): 51-5.
19. Bernardini J. Everything I ever wanted to know abaut peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis
International 1999; (19) 595-596.
20. Nasso L. Our peritonitis continuous quality improvement project: Where there is a will.
CANNT Journal 2006; (6)1: 20-23.
21. Boehm M ; Vecsei A, Aufricht C, Mueller T, Csaicsich D, Arbeiter K. Risk factors for peritonitis in
pediatric peritoneal dialysis: A single-center study. Pediatr Nephrology 2005; 20(10): 1478-83.
Sürekli Ayaktan Periton Diyalizi Uygulanan Çocuklarda Evde Izlemin Peritonit Görülme Sıklığına Etkisi
Effects of Home Visits to Frequency of Peritonitis in Children with Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis
11
Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi (2006) 1–11
22. Erek E. Diyaliz Tedavisi. Nobel Tıp Kitabevi. İstanbul: 1995.
23. Nergizoglu G. Sürekli Ayaktan Periton Diyalizi Uygulayan Hastalarda Peritonit Sıklığını Etkileyen
Faktörler. Yayınlanmamış Uzmanlık Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi Nefroloji Bilim Dalı. Ankara:1998.
24. Rahim KA ; Seidel K ; McDonald RA Risk factors for catheter-related complications in pediatric
peritoneal dialysis. Pediatr Nephrology 2004; 19(9): 1021-8.
25. Yuj S. The effect of home visiting education on self-care of capd patient. Peritoneal Dialysis
International 1999; 19(1): 87-91
26. Bemardini J. Patient complience. Peritoneal Dialysis International 1997; (17): 419-21.
27. Farina J. Peritoneal dialysis: A case for home visits. Nephrology Nursing Journal 2001; 28(4): 423-27.
28. Bolton WK. Nephrology nurse practise in a collaborative care model. American Journal of Kidney
Disease 1998; 31(5): 7 86-793.
29. Warmington VA. Home visit program for CAPD. Peritoneal Dialysis International 1996; 16(1): 475-
478.
30. Öztarhan S. Ayaktan devamlı periton diyalizi tedavisinde ev ziyaretleri ve peritonit riski arasındaki
ilişki. Çınar Dergisi 1995; 1(4): 12.
31. Müller-Wiefer DE. Treatment of peritonitis in pediatric continious peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal
Dialysis International 1999; 19(2): 450-457.
32. Verrina E. Perfümo F. Calevo MG. The Italian pediatric chronic peritoneal dialysis registry.
Peritoneal Dialysis International 1999;19(2): 479-483.
33. Waradey BA, Sullivan EK, Alexander SR. Lessons from the peritoneal dialysis patient database: A
report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooparative Study. Kidney International
1996; 49 (53): 68-71
34. Perez-Fortan M. Indidence of peritonitis and exit- site ınfection in CAPD and APD. A comparative
study. Peritoneal Dialysis International 1999; 19 (19): 35-39
35. Piraino B. Infectious complications of peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International, 1997;
17(3): 15-18

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com