You are here

Home » Content

ŞİŞMAN KADINLARDA VÜCUT YAĞ MİKTARININ BELİRLENMESİNDE ÜST KOL ANTROPOMETRİK PARAMETRELERİNİN DEĞERİ

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2003

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The reliability ofupper limb anthropometry as a predictor ofbodyfat in obese women. The aim of this study is to cvaluate the relationshİps betwcen upper limb anthropometric parame-ters and body fat in obese (body mass iııdex, BMI >27 kg/m2) women. Study group is consis-ted of 215 obese subjects. There were signifİcant posİtİvc corrclatİons betwcen upper arm arca (TUA) and weight (r:.7393), BMI (r:.7434), fat mass determined by bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) (FW) (n.7288) and lean mass by BIA (LAV) (r:.5120); between upper arm fat area (UFA) and vveight (r:.7112), BMI (r:.6659), FW (r:.7074) ve LW (r:.5346) and between corrected arm muscle area (cAMA) and weight (r:.7133), BMI (r:.7192), FW (r:.6920) and ve LAV (r:.4996). In conclusİon, TUA, UFA and cAMA wcre simple equations to assess body composition.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma şişman kadınlarda vücut yağ miktarının belirlenmesinde üst kol antropomctrilc parametrelerinin değerini araştırmak amacıyla yapıldı. 215 şişman (vücut kitle indeksi, BMI>27 kg/m2) kadında üst kol antropometrik ölçümlerinden hesaplanan rota! üst kol alanı (TUA) ağırlık (r:.7393), vücut kitle indeksi (BMI) (r:.7434), biyoelektrik impedans analiz (BIA) yöntemi ile hesaplanan yağ (FW) (r:.7288) ve adale kitlesi (LAV) (r:.5120); üst kol yağ alanı (UFA) ile ağırlık (r:.7112), BMI (r:.6659), FW (r:.7074) ve LW (r:.5346) ve düzeltilmiş adale alanı (cAMA) ile ağırlık (r:.7i33), BMI (r:.7192), FW (r:.6920) ve LW (r:.4996) arasında anlamlı pozitif ilişkiler saptandı (tümü için p:.000). Bu bulgular üst kol antropometrik parametrelerinin şişman kadınlarda vücut bileşimi {vücut yağ miktarı) hakkında fikir verebileceğini desteklemektedir
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-sisman-kadinlarda-vucut-yag-miktarinin-belirlenmesinde-ust-kol-antropometrik-parametrelerinin-degeri.pdf
  • 2
101-104
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Armitage P, Bcrry G: Statistical Methods İn Medical Research, Bİackwcll, Oxford, 2. Baskı, (1987).
2. Derman O, Yalçın SS, Kaııbıır NO, Kınık E: The impor-tance of tne men su rem en i of Ihe circumference of arm, arm muscle area and skinfold thickness during puberty. IntJAdolesc Mcd Health 14: 193 (2002).
3. Despres JP, Prudhomme D, Pouliot MC, Tremblay A, Bouchard C: Esümation of deep abdorainal adipose tis-sue accumulation from simple anthropometric measure-ments in men. Anı J Clin Nutr 54: 471 (1991).
4. Durnin JVGA, Womersley J: Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness. Measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16-72 years. Br J Nutr 32: 77 (1974).
5. Gibson RS: Anthropometric assessment of body compo-silion. Principles of Nııtritional Assessment, Oxford Press, Oxford(1990) s: 187.
6. Gray DS: Diagnosis and prevalence of obesity. Med Clin North Am 73: 1 (1989).
7. Gurney JM, Jclliffe DB: Arm anthropometry in nutritio-nal assessment. Nomogram for rapid calculation muscle
circumference and eross seetionai muscle fat areas. Am J Clin Nutr 26: 913 (1973).
8. Jelliffe EFP, Jelliffc DB: The arm circumference as a public health index of proteİn-calorie malnutrition of early childhood. J Trop Pediatr 15: 179 (1969).
9. Himes JH, Roche AF, Wcbb P: Fal areas as estimates of tolal body fat. Am I Clein Nutr 33: 2093 (1980).
10. Kwok T, Woo J, Chaıı HHL, Lau E: The veliability of upper limb anthropometry in older Chincse people. Int J Obcsily21:542(1997).
11. Lukaskİ HC: Methods for the assessment of human body composition. Traditional and new. Am J Clin Nutr 46: 537(1987).
12. Nie NH, Hul! CM, Jcnkins JG, Steinbrennar K, Bcnta DM: Statistical Packagc of Ihe Social Sciences, McGraw Hill, New York, 2.Baskı, (1975).
13. Norusis MJ: SPSS/PC+ for the IBM PC/XT/AT. SPSS Inc, Chicago, (1986).
14. Puonane T, Steyn K, Bradshaw D, Luubscher R, Foııric J, Lambert V, Mbananga N: Obesity in South Africa. The South African demograpbic and health survey. Obes Res 10: 1038(2002).
15. Richelsen B, Petersen SB: Association beiween different anthropometric measurements of fatness and metabolic risk parameters in non-obese, hcalthy, middle-aged men. Int JObcsity 19: 169 (1995).
16. Rolland-Cachera MF, Branıbilla P, Manzoni P, Akrout M, Dei Maschio A, Chiumeho G: A new anthropometric index, validated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRl) to assess body composition. Int J Obesity 19 (suppl 2):47 (1995).
17. Sardinha LB, Going SB, Teixeira PJ, Lohman TG: Rccc-iver operating characlerislic analysis of body mass indcx, triceps skinfold thickness and arm giıth for obesity seree-ning in children and adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr 70: 1090(1999).
i 8. Suzana S, EarSand J, Suriah AR, Warnes AM: Social and health factors influencing poor nııtritional slalus among rurai eklerİy malays. J Nutr Health Aging 6: 363 (2002).
19. Todorovska L, Sahpasova E, Todorovski D: Autropo-metry of the irmik and extremities in nutritiona! asses-ment of children with ehronic renal failurc. J Ren Nutr 12: 238 (2002).
20. Wang J, Laferrere B, Thormon JC, Picrson RN Jr, Pi-Sunyer FX: Regional subcutaneous fat loss induced by caloric rcstrictİon in obese woınen. Obes Res 10: 885 (2002).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com