You are here

Home » Content

SERVİKAL YARALANMALARDA HALO-VEST TEDAVİSİ

Journal Name:

  • Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2002

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this report, we try to describe the halo-vest treatment in patients with cervical spine õnjuries. The complications as a consequence halo-vest treatment also have discussed in the light of the literature. Design.- The study included the 55 consecutive patients who admitted to the Emergency Department of Cerrahpasa Medical School between 1986 and 2001 and who were treated by halo-vest. Results.- Forty-five of 55 patients were treated solely by halo-vest conservatively but 10 patients were required surgical intervention as anterior/posterior fusion following halo-vest. Twenty-four of 29 patients with upper cervical injuries and 21 of 26 patients with lower cervical injuries were treated by halo-vest successfully. The success rate in this series was found to be 96.6 %. Conclusion.- Although there are some complications as in all treatment modalities, the halo-vest is considered by us to be the best commercially available orthosis for control of the cervical spine in case of injury. Furthermore, we think that if applied properly, the number of the complications related to the halo-vest will be reduced and success rate will be high.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
1. Servikal yaralanma şüphesinde radyografik görüntüler rutin olarak alınmalıdır. Gerekirse dikkatli bir şekilde fleksiyon/ekstansiyon grafileri de sağlanmalıdır. 2. Üst ve alt servikal yaralanmalarda halovest ile immobilizasyon sağlanmalıdır. Eğer faset kilitlenmesi varsa veya posterior kompleks yaralanması varsa halo-vest ile stabilizasyon sağlandıktan sonra cerrahi uygulanmalıdır. 3. Halo-vest bize göre piyasada bulunan en iyi servikal immobilizasyon aracıdır. Kurallara uygun olarak takıldığında komplikasyonlar en aza inecektir. 4. Vurgulamak gerekir ki, halo-vest her zaman servikal immobilizasyonda tam garanti sağlamaz. Endikasyon iyi konulmadan kulanı- lırsa yıkıcı komplikasyonlar doğurabilir. Bu nedenle uygulandıktan sonra rutin kalması gereken 3 ay içinde her 4 haftada bir kez olmak üzere servikal direkt grafiler alınarak servikal bölge değerlendirilmelidir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-servikal-yaralanmalarda-halo-vest-tedavisi.pdf
  • 4
245-251
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Crutchfield WG. Skeletal traction for dislocations of the
cervical spine.The Southern Surgeon 1993; 2: 156-159.
2. Cloward RB. Treatment of acute fractures and fracturedislocations
of the cervical spine by vertebral-body
fusion. J Neurosurg 1961; 18: 201-209.
3. Gallie WE. Fractures and dislocations of the cervical
spine. Am J Surg 1939; 46: 495-499.
4. Verbiest H. Anterolateral operations for fractures and
dislocations in the middle and lower parts of the cervical
spine. J Bone Joint Surg 1969; 51A: 1489-1530.
5. Johnson RM, Owen JR, Hart DL, et al. Cervical orthosis:
A guide to their selection and use. Clin Orthop Related
Res. 1981; 154: 34-45.
6. Perry J, Nickel VL. Total cervical-spine fusion for neck
paralysis. J Bone Joint Surg 1959; 41A: 37-60.
7. James JIP. Fracture dislocation of the cervical spine. J
Roy Coll Surg 1960; 5: 232.
8. Thompson, Harral. The halo traction apparatus. A method
of external splitting of the cervical spine after injury. J
Bone and Joint Surg 1962; 44B: 655-661.
9. Freeman GE Jr. Correction of severe deformity of the
cervical spine in ankylosing spondylitis with the halo
device. A case report. J Bone and Joint Surg 1961; 43A:
547-552.
10. Panuska HJ, and Dedolph TH. Extraoral traction with
halo head frame for complex facial fractures. J Oral Surg
1965; 23: 212-221.
11. Ekong CEU, Schwartz ML, Tator CH, et al. Odontoid
fracture: management with early mobilization using the
halo device. Neurosurgery 1981; 9: 631-637.
12. Johnson RM, Hart DL, Simmons EF, et al. Cervical
orthoses. A study comparing their effectiveness in
restricting cervical motion in normal subjects. J Bone
Joint Surg (Am) 1977; 59A: 332-339.
13. Kuhn RA, Garrett A. The halo in the management of
cervical spine lesions. Orthopaedic Review 1972; 1(6):
25-27.
14. Lyddon DW Jr. Experience with the halo and body cast
in the ambulatory treatment of cervical spine fractures.
IMJ 1974; 146: 458-490.
15. Zwerling MT, and Riggins RS. Use of the halo apparatus
in acute injuries of the cervical spine. Surgery,
Gynecology and Obstetrics 1974; 138: 189-193.
16. Cooper PR, Maravilla KR, Sklar FH, et al. Halo
immobilization of cervical spine fractures: Indications
and results. J Neurosurg 1979; 50:603-610.
17. O’Brien JP. The halo-pelvic apparatus: A clinical, bioenengineering
and anatomical study. (Thesis). Acta
Orthop Scand 1975; 163(Suppl): 20-28.
18. Nickel VL, Perry J, Garrett A, et al. The halo. J Bone
Joint Surg 1968; 50A: 1400-1409.
19. Frankel HL, Hancock DO, Hyslop G, et al. The value of
postural reduction in the initial management of closed
injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia.
Paraplegia 1969; 7: 179-192.
20. Koch RA, Nickel VL. The halo vest: an evaluation of
motion and forces across the neck. Spine 1978; 3: 103-
107.
21. Whitehill R, Richman JA, Glaser JA. Failure of
immobilization of the cervical spine by the halo vest:
Report of five cases. J Bone Joint Surg 1986; 68A: 326-
332.
22. Garfin S, Botte MJ, Diego S, et al. Complications in the
use of the halo fixation device. J Bone Joint Surg 1986;
68A: 320-325.
23. Glaser JA, Whitehill R, Stamp WG, et al. Complications
associated with the halo-vest: A review of 245 cases. J
Neurosurg 1986; 65: 762-769.
Ekim-Aralõk 2002 SERVİKAL YARALANMA VE HALO-VEST; TANRIVERDİ VE ARK.
251
24. Lind B, Sihlbom H, and Nordwall A. Halo-vest treatment
of unstable traumatic cervical spine injuries. Spine 1988;
13: 425-432.
25. Kostuik JP. Indications for the use of the halo
immobilization. Clin Orthop Related Res 1981; 154: 46-
50.
26. Botte MJ, Garfin SR, Byrne TP, et al. The halo skeletal
fixator. Clin Orthop Related Res 1989; 239: 12-18.
27. Aebi M, Mohler J, Zach GA, et al. Indication, surgical
technique, and results of 100 surgically-treated fractures
and fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine. Clin
Orthop 1986; 203: 244-257.
28. Sears W, and Fazl M. Prediction of stability of cervical
spine fracture managed in the halo vest and indications
for surgical intervention. J Neurosurg 1990; 72: 426-432.
29. Bucholz RD, and Cheung C. Halo vest versus spinal
fusion for cervical injury: evidence from an outcome
study. J Neurosurg 1989; 70: 884-892.
30. Hadley MN, Browner C, Sonntag VKH. Axis fractures: a
comprehensive review of management and treatment in
107 cases. Neurosurgery 1985; 17: 281-289.
31. Chan RC, Schweigel JF, Thompson GB. Halo-thoracic
brace immobilization in 188 patients with acute cervical
spine injuries. J Neurosurg 1983; 58: 508-515.
32. Anderson LD, D’Alonzo RT. Fractures of the odontoid
process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1974; 56:
1663-1674.
33. Apuzzo MLJ, Heiden JS, Weiss MH, et al. Acute
fractures of the odontoid process. An analysis of 45
cases. J Neurosurg 1978; 48: 85-91.
34. Chou SN, and Larson SJ. Management of odontoid
fractures. Neurosurgery 1982; 11: 476.
35. Maiman DJ, Larson SJ. Management of odontoid
fractures. Neurosurgery 1986; 18: 542-547.
36. Schatzker J, Rorabeck CH, Waddell JP. Fractures of the
dens (odontoid process). An analysis of 37 cases. J Bone
Joint Surg (Br) 1971; 53: 392-405.
37. Schweigel JF. Halo-thoracic brace management of
odontoid fractures. Spine 1979; 4: 192-194.
38. Heary RF, Hunt CD, Krieger AJ, et al. Acute stabilization
of the cervical spine by halo/vest application facilitates
evaluation and treatment of multiple trauma patients. J
Trauma 1992; 33(3): 445-451.
39. Marr J, Edmonds V. The halo apparatus: essentials for
patient management. Axone 1992; 14(1): 16-20.
40. Koivikko MP, Myllynen P, Karjalainen M, et al.
Conservative and operative treatment in cervical burst
fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000; 120(7): 448-
451.
41. Grady MS, Howard MA, Jane JA, et al. Use of the
Philadelphia collar as an alternative to the halo vest in
patients with C-2, C-3 fractures. Neurosurgery 1986; 18:
151-156.
42. Vieweg U, Schulthesis. A review of halo vest treatment
of upper cervical spine injuries. Arch Orthop Trauma
Surg 2001; 121(1-2): 50-55.
43. Seljeskog EL, Chou SM. Spectrum of the Hangman’s
fracture. J Neurosurg 1976; 45: 3-8.
44. Brashear HR Jr, Venters GC, Preston ET. Fractures of the
neural arch of the axis. A report of twenty-nine cases. J
Bone Joint Surg 1975; 57A: 879-887.
45. Sonntag VKH. Management of bilateral locked facets of
the cervical spine. Neurosurgery 1981; 8: 150-152.
46. Braakman R, Vinken PJ. Unilateral facet interlocking in
the lower cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1967; 49:
249-257.
47. Webb JK, Broughton RBK, McSweeney T, et al. Hidden
flexion injury of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg
(Br). 1976; 58: 322-327.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com