You are here

Home » Content

BILIŞSEL DILBILIM, ŞIIRIN BILIŞSEL SÖYLEMI VE SISLER BULVARI'NDA BlLlŞSEL ETKINLEŞTIRME

COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS, COGNITIVE RHETORIC OF POETRY AND COGNITIVE ACTIVATION IN SİSLER BULVARI

Journal Name:

  • Turkish Studies

Publication Year:

  • 2010
DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.1809

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Poetry, with its production and perception, is one of the cognitive activities of human mind. Comprehending poetry as a cognitive activity, naturally, involves some cognitive processes that are related to human cognition. Recent scientific exploration resulted in the emergence of new disciplines in which cognitive and human sciences merge together. Cognitive linguistics, one of the newly emerged disciplines, investigates the cognitive processes in literary texts, an area where language has a specific purpose. Recent cognitive linguistic research shows that metaphor, a very common poetic device, is not only a figure of speech but also a process in which cognitive elements are involved. In this article, I examine Attila İlhan's well-known poem Sisler Bulvarı from a cognitive-linguistic perspective.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Şiir hem üretim hem de alımlama süreci bakımından insan zihninin estetik ve bilişsel etkinliklerinden biridir. Bilişsel bir etkinlik olarak şiirin anlaşılması, doğal olarak, insanın bilişselliğini ilgilendiren bazı süreçleri de içine almaktadır. Son yıllarda bilim dünyasında meydana gelen gelişmeler, bilişsel bilimler ile insanî bilimlerin buluştuğu yeni bazı çalışma alanları ortaya çıkarmıştır. Bu alanlardan biri olan bilişsel dilbilim, dilin özel kullanım alanlarından biri olan edebî metinlerdeki bilişsel süreçleri inceler. Bilişsel dilbilim alanında son dönemde yapılan araştırmalar, şiir diline ait en yaygın kullanımlardan biri olan metaforun, yalnızca dilsel boyutu olan bir söz sanatı değil, aynı zamanda bilişsel boyutu olan bir süreç olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Bu çalışmada, Attila İlhan'ın Sisler Bulvarı başlıklı şiirindeki bilişsel süreçler, bilişsel dilbilimin yaklaşımlarından hareketle incelenecektir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-bilissel-dilbilim-siirin-bilissel-soylemi-sisler-bulvarinda-blllssel-etkinlestirme.pdf
  • 4
479-501
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

AUDEN, W. H.
(2003)
. The Sea and The Mirror, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
AKTAŞ, Şerif (2009). Şiir Tahlili, Teori-Uygulama, Ankara: Akçağ.
BACHELARD, Gaston (2005). On Poetic Imagination and Reverie,
Texas: Spring Publications.
CAUDWELL, Christopher (1977). Illusion and Reality, New York: International Publishers.
COHEN, Patricia, "Next Big Thing in English: Knowing They Know That You Know", New York Times, 31 Mart 2010.
COSERIU, Eugene (1955). Determination y entorno,
Romanistisches, Jahrbuch, 7.
ÇELİK, Yakup (1998). Şubat Yolcusu, Ankara: Akçağ.
GEE, Paul (1999). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis, Routledge.
ECO, Umberto (1981), Semiotics and The Philosophy of Language,
Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
DİLÇİN, Cem (1983). Örneklerle Türk Şiir Bilgisi, TDK Yayınları, Ankara.
FAUCONNIER, G. ve
Sweeste
r E. (1996). Eds. Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
FAUCONNIER, G. ve Turner M. (2002). The Way We Think, New
York: Basic Books.
FOWLER, Roger (1979). New Accents, Linguistics and the Novel, New York: Methuen.
FREEMAN, H. Margaret (2002). "Cognitive Mapping in Literary Analysis", Style, Vol. 36, No. 3, 466-483.
HAMILTON, Craig (2005). "A Cognitive Rhetoric of Poetry and
Emily Dickinson", Language and Literature, Vol. 14 (3):
279-294.
JOHNSON, Mark (1987). The Body in the Mind, The Bodily Basis Of Meaning, Imagination, And Reason, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
KAPLAN,
Mehme
t (1979). Hikâye Tahlilleri, İstanbul: Dergah.
Turkish Studies
International Periodical For the Languages, Literature
and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 5/4 Fall 2010
Bilişsel Dilbilim... 501
KIEV, Belekhova (1999). "Cognitive models of verbal poetic images", Formal, Computational & Computational Linguistics, Winter.
KIMMEL, Michael (2005). "From Metaphor to the "Mental
Sketchpad": Literary Macrostructure and Compound Image Schemas in the Heart of Darkness", Metaphor and Symbol, 20(3), 199-238.
KOCAKAPLAN,
İs
a (1992). Açıklamalı Edebiyat Sanatları, İstanbul: MEB.
LAKOFF, G. ve Johnson M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By,
Chicago ve London: The University of Chicago Press.
LAKOFF, G. ve Turner, M. (1989), More Than Cool Reason, A
Field to Guide Poetic Metaphor, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
LODGE, David (1992). The Art of Fiction, London: Penguin.
MCCLOSKEY, Mary (1964). "Metaphors", Mind, LXXIII, 290, April.
ÖZÜNLÜ, Ünsal, (2001). Edebiyatta Dil Kullanımları, İstanbul: Multilingual.
SELDEN, R. ve
Widdowso
n P. (1993). A Reader's Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory, Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.
SEMINO, Elena (1995). "Schema Theory and The Analysis of Text Worlds in Poetry", Language and Literature, 4, 2, 79-108
SCHNEIDER, Ralf (2001). "Toward a Cognitive Theory of Literary Character, The Dynamics of Mental-model Construction",
Style, 35(4), 607-40.
TITSCHER, Stefan (2000). Michael Meyer, Ruth Wodak, Eva Vetter, Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis, London: Sage Publications.
Tsur, Reuven (2002). Aspects of Cognitive Poetics, Ed. Elena Semino and Jonathon Culpeper, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
ZUNSHINE, Lisa (2006). Why We Read Fiction? Theory of Mind
and Novel, Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com