You are here

Home » Content

İNDİREKT KOMPOZİT İNLEY RESTORASYONLAR İLE DİREKT KOMPOZİT RESTORASYONLARIN MİKROSIZINTI YÖNÜNDEN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE OF DIRECT COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS WITH INDIRECT COMPOSITE INLAY R ESTORATIONS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of in vitro this study to evaluate the microleakage performance of direct restorations or indirect composite inlays restorations applied to Class II cavities. 84 freshly extracted caries free permanent human premolar teeth were used in this study. The specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups and each containing 28 teeth. Clas II cavities were made in each tooth. Gingival margins of all cavities were placed 1mm occlusal to cement-enamel junction. All restorations were made with Valux plus (3M, ESPE) composite resin. In group I prepared cavities were restored by G bond+Valux Plus. Group II and Group III cavities were prepared according to common principles for adhesive inlays. In group II prepared cavities were restored with Coltene inlay system. Group III prepared cavities were restored with Tescera ATL system. Inlays were luted utilizing dual cure resin cement (ParaCem, Coltene Whaledent). All specimens were then finished with fine particle finishing diamonds, polishing strips (Soflex,3M) and stored in disti-led water for 24 hours at 37 0C. Specimens therocycled for 1000cycles and stored in 0.5% basic fuchsin solution for 24 hours. Then all specimens were cut by a slow speed diamond saw (Isomet, Buehler Ltd, Lake Bluff, IL, USA) in mesio-distal direction. Dye penetration at ena-mal and gingival marins were viewed at x30 magni¬fications and scored. Results wee statistically evaluated by using Kruskall Wallis and Mann -Whitney U test. At gingival margins all test groups showed signifi-ciantly higher microleakage than occlusal margins. (p<0.001) The least microleakage scores were obtained with Tescera ATL indirect system using prepared inlays. (p<0.001) As a conclusion, it was observed that Tescera indirect composite inlay system is a good alternative to both direct composite and indirect Coltene inlay system for the posterior teeth restorations.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu invitro çalışmanın amacı Sınıf II kavitelere direkt uygulanan kompozit restorasyonlar ile indirekt kompozit inley restorasyonların mikrosızıntı performansını değerlendirmektir. 84 adet yeni çekilmiş çürüksüz daimi premolar diş çalışmada kullanılmıştır. Örnekler her grupta 28 diş olacak rastgele 3 gruba ayrılmıştır. Tüm örneklerde gingival sınırları mine sement sınırının 1mm yukarısında olacak şekilde Sınıf II kaviteler hazırlanmıştır. Tüm restorasyonlarda Valux Plus (3M, ESPE) kompozit resin kullanılmıştır. Grup I de hazırlanan kaviteler G bond+Valux Plus'la restore edilmiştir. Grup II and Grup III deki kaviteler adhesive inley prensiplerine göre hazırlanmıştır. Grup II deki örnekler Coltene inlay sistemle restore edilmiştir. Grup III deki örnekler Tescera ATL sistemle restore edilmiştir. İnleyler dual cure resin simanla (ParaCem, Coltene Whaledent) yapıştırılmıştır. Tüm örnekler ince partiküllü elmas bitirme frezleri ve cila sitripleriyle (Soflex, 3M) bitirilmiş ve 24 saat 37 0 C de distile suda bekletilmiştir. Örneklere 1000 kez termal siklus uygulanarak % 0.5'lik bazik fuksin solüsyonunda 24 saat bekletilmiştir .Örnekler mesio-distal doğrultuda düşük hızlı elmas kesim cihazıyla (Isomet, Buehler Ltd, Lake Bluff, IL, USA) kesilerek gingival ve oklüzal marjindeki boya penetrasyonu x30 büyütme altında incelenmiş ve skorlanmıştır. Veriler Kruskall Wallis ve Man-Whitney U testi kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. üm test gruplarında gingival sızıntı değerleri oklüzaldeki değerlerden istatistiksel olarak önemli oranda yüksek bulunmuştur. (p<0.001) En az mikrosızıntı değerleri Tescera ATL sistemle yapılan indirekt inleylerde elde edilmiştir. (p<0.001) Sonuç olarak posterior bölgede Tescera ATL sistem indirekt inleyler direkt kompozit restorasyonlara ve indirekt coltene sistem inleylere nazaran daha iyi bir alternatif olduğunu söyleyebiliriz.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-indirekt-kompozit-inley-restorasyonlar-ile-direkt-kompozit-restorasyonlarin-mikrosizinti-yonunden-karsilastirilmasi.pdf
  • 2
76-84
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1- Douglas WH,Fields RP, Fundingsland J. A
Comparison Between the Microleakage of Direct and indirect Composite Restorative Systems. J Dent 1989;17:184-188.
2- Krejci J, Lutz F.Marginal Adaptation of Class V
Restorations Using Different Restorative Tecniques. J Dent 1991;19:24-32
3- Segura A,Donly KJ.İn Vitro Posterior Composite
Polimerization Recovery following Hygroscopic Expansion. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20: 495-499
4- Kawaguchi M,Fukushima T,Miyazaki K. The
relationship Between Cure Depth and Transmission Coeficient of Visible-Light-Activated Resin Composites. J Dent Res 1994;73(2):516-
521
5- Gwinnett AJ, Baratieri LN,Monteiro S,Ritter AV.
Adhesive Restorations With Amalgam:Guidelines for the clinician.Quint Int 1994;25:687-695
6- Dayangaç B. Kompozit Resin Restorasyonlar.
Ankara,
Önc
ü basımevi. 2000
7- Ferdianakis K.Microleakage Reduction from never
esthetic Restorative Materials in Permanent Molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998: 22(3):221-229
8- Alani AH,Toh C,G.Detection of Microleakage Around
Dental Restorations : A Rewiev Oper Dent
1997:22-173-185
9- Wilson E, MandradJieffM, Brindock T. Conversies in
posterior composite resin restorations. Dent Clin
Nort Am 1990;34: 27-44
10- Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, Peters MC. Curing
Light Performance and Polimerization of composite Restorative Materials. J Dent 1992;20
183-188
11- Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA.
Bacteria Leakage Around Dental Restorations. Its effect on the pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982; 11-439¬450
12- Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Microleakage J Dent 1992;
20:3-10
13- Combe EC, Burke FJT. Contemporary resin based
composite materials for direct placement restorations: packables, flowables and others. Dent update 2000;27: 326-336
14- Mehl A, Hickel R,Kunzelmann H. Physical Properties
and Gap Formation of Light Cured Composites with and without Soft-start Polimerizations. J Dent
1997; 23: 321-330
15- Unterbring GL, Muesner R. Influence of Light
Intensity On Two Restorative Systems J Dent
1995; 23:183-189
16-
Işıkl
a sertleşen farklı kompozit resinlerin polimerizasyon büzülmesi ve mikrosızıntısı ile cam seramik insertlerin polimerizasyon büzülmesi ve mikrosızıntı üzerine etkisinin incelenmesi doktora tezi1999-Y.Ziya Bayındır
17- Çetiner S. Cam iyonomer simanların kenar
sızıntılarının araştırılmasında kullanılan farklı iki boyanın sonuca etkileri A.Ü Diş. Hek. Fak. Derg.
1992;19: 415-419
18- Dashley DH, Carvaldho RM. Dentin Permability and Dentin Adhesion Journal of Dentistry 1997; 25:
355-372
19- Donly KJ,
Wil
d TW, Bowen RL, Jensen ME. An in
Vitro Investigation of the Effect of Glass Inserts on the Effective Composite Resin Polymerization Shrinkage. J Dent Rest 1989; 68: 1234-1237
20- Watts DC. Composite inlay systems: Material
Properties and design. J Dent 1990; 18: 69-70
21- Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson C, L. increased
wall-to-wall Curing Contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent 1989; 68 48-50
22- Ariyaratnam MT, Wilson M.A, Wilson NH, Watts DC.
Variation in the Thickness of the Composite Lute with an Indirect Composite Inlay System. Restor
Dent 1990;6: 16-21
23- Sheth PJ, Jensen ME, Sheth J. Comparative evaluation of three resin inlay techniques: microleakage studies. Quint Int 1989; 20:831-836
24- Meerbeek BV, Inokoshi S, Willams G, Noack MJ, Braem M, Lambechts P, Roulet F, Vanherle G: Marginal adaptation of four tooth-colored inlay systems in vivo. J Dent, 1992 20:18-29
25- Asmussen E. Clinical Relevance of Physical, Chemical and Bonding Properties of Composite Resins. Oper Dent 1985; 10: 61-73.
26- Bağış Y.H. Işık veya Isı ve Işık Fırınında
Polimerizasyonları Tamamlanan Kompozit İnleylerin Mikrosızıntı Yönünden In Vitro Olarak İncelenmesi T Klin. 1 Dental Sci 1999; 5:106-117
82
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
Cilt: 19, Sayı: 2, Yıl: 2009, Sayfa: 76-84
ÖZAKAR İLDAY, URVASIZOĞLU, SEVEN
27- Sherer W, Çalışkan F,Kaim J,Moss S. Comparison of
microleakage
betwee
n direct placement composites and direct composite inlays. Gen
Dent.1990; 38: 209-211
28- Crim GA, Swartz ML, Philips RW. Comparation of
fou termocycling tecnigues. J. Prosthet Dent 198;
53: 50-53
29- Ziskind D, Elbaz B, Hirschfeld Z, Rosen L.Amalgam
Alternatives -Microleakage evaluation of clinical procedures. Part II: Direct/Indirect Composite İnlay Systems Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
1998;25: 502-506
30- _Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Adhesive Metal-Free
Restorations. Current Concepts for the Esthetic Treatment of Posterior Teeth, Quintessence Publishing Co.Inc., Chicago, 1997.60-77
31- Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Mechanical Properties of three composite resins for the inlay/ onlay tecnique. J.Prosthet Dent 1991;66: 322-324
32- Wendt SL, Leinfelder KF. The Clinical evaluation of
heat treated composite resin inlays. J. Am Dent
Assoc. 1990;120: 177-181
33- Thordrup M.Isidor F, Bindslay HP. Comparison of
marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays. An in vitro study.J Dent.1994:147-
153
34- Krejci I, Lutz, F, Gautschi L. Wear and Marginal
Adaptation of Composite Resin Inlays Oper Dent.
1994;72:233-244
35- Ruyter IE, Svendsen SA . Remaining methacrylate
groups in composite restorative materials. Acta Odontol Scand 1978;36:75-82.
36- Loza-Henrerol MA, Rueggeberg FA, Caughmanz
W.F. Scduster G.S, Lefebvr C.A, and Gardnei EM. Effect of Heating Delay on Conversion and Strength of a Post-cured Resin Composite,1998J
Dent Res 77(2): 426-431
37- Hasanreisoğlu U,Sönmez H, Üçtaşlı S, Wilson HJ.
Microleakage of Direct and Indirect Inlay/onlay Systems.J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:66-71
38- Akören A.C,Üçtaşlı S.Farklı porselen inley sistemleri
ve farklı yapıştırma simanlarının mikrosızıntı üzerine etkileri. T Klin Diş Hek Bil. 1998:4; 100¬105
83
39- Hilton TJ, Scwartz RS. Ferracane JL. Microleakage
of Four Class II Resin Composite Insertion Tecniques at Intraoral Temperature. Quintessence
Int 1997.28: 135-144
40- Sim C, Neo J, Chua EK, Tan BY. The Effect of
Dentin Bonding Agents on the Microleakage of porcelain veneers.Dent Mater 1994 10:278-281
41- Staninec M, Mochizuki A,Tanizaki K,Jakuda
K,Tsuchitani Y. Interfacial space, marginal leakage and enamel cracks around composite resins. Oper Dent1986; 11:14-24
42- Ünlü I, Bala O. İnley Restorasyonların Mikrosızıntısı
Üzerine Kavite Preparasyon Tekniklerinin ve Farklı Materyallerin Kullanımının Etkisi G.Ü Diş Hek Derg.2007 24;1 37-43
43- Hickel R,Dasch R, Janda M, Tyas M, Anusavice
K.New Direct Restorative Materials. Int Dent
1998;48:3-16
44- Mileding P.Microleakage of Indirect Composite
Inlays. Acta Odontol Scand 1992;50:295-301.
45- Liberman R, Ben Amar A, Hertanau L, Judges
H.Marginal Seal of Composite Inlays Using Different Polymerization Tecniques 1997 J Oral Rehabil 24;26-29
46- Arıkan S,Alpaslan G,Turgut, M.D. Farklı Tekniklerle
Yapılan Sınıf II Restorasyonların Mikrosızıntı ve Kenar Uyumu Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg. 2005; 29/3
33-41
47- Fruits Tj, Knapp JA, Khajotia SS. Microleakage In The Poksimal Wall of Direct and Indirect Posterior Resin Slot Restorations. Oper Dent.2006 31:6;
719-727.
48- Duquia RCS, Osinaga PWR, Demarco FF, Habekost LV, Conceiçâo EN. Cervical Microleakage in MOD Restorations: In Vitro Comparison of Indirect and Direct Composite Operative Dentistry 2006 31;682-687.
49- Peutzfeldt A Indirect resin and ceramic systems.
Oper Dent 26 [supple 6]:153-176 2001
50- Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A.Mechanical properties of
heat threated restorative resins for use in the inlay/onlay tecnique. Scand J Dent Res 1990;98:564-567
51- van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P.Marginal breakdown of
5-year old direct composite inlays.Journal of dentistry 1996;24:389-394
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
Cilt: 19, Sayı: 2, Yıl: 2009, Sayfa: 76-84
ÖZAKAR İLDAY, URVASIZOĞLU, SEVEN
52- Robinson PB, Moore BK, Swartz ML.Comparison of
microleakage
i
n direct and indirect composite resin restorations in vitro . Oper Dent 1987;
21:113-116
53- Sheth PJ, Jensen ME, Sheth JJ. Comparative
evaluation of thee resin inlay tecniques: microleakage studies. Quintessence Int
1989;20:831-836
54- Krejci I,Güntert A,Lutz F.Scanning Electron Microscopic and Clinical Examination of composite
Resin Inlays/onlays up to12 months in situ. Quint
Int.1994; 25: 403-409
55- Terry DA, Leinfelder KF. Development of a processed composite resin restoration:Preparation and laboratory fabrication. International Dentistry
SA 2006;17(5):12-19
56- Terry DA, Tauati B.Clinical considerations for aesthetics laboratory-fabricated inlay onlay restorations: a rewiev Pract Proced Aesthet Dent
2001;13(1):51-58
57- Howard NY. Advanced use of an esthetic indirect
posterior resin system. Compendium1997;18(10)
1044-1054
58- Peutzfelt A, Asmussen E. A comparison of accuracy
in seating and gap formation for three inlay/onlay tecniques. Oper Dent 1990, 15:129-135
59- Thordrup M.Isidor F, Bindslay HP. A one-year clinical study of indirect and direct ceramic inlays.Scand J Dent Res. 1994 102:186-192
60- Ferreira M.C, Vieira R.S Marginal leakage in direct and indirect composite resin restorations in primary teeth: An in vitro study. Journal of Dentistry 2008 36;322-325

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com