You are here

Home » Content

İMPLANTOLOJİDE AÇILI BAŞLIK UYGULAMALARI

APPLICATIONS ANGLED ABUTMENT IN IMPLANTOLOGY

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2005

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Important improvements involving implant materials and designing have been obtained following the biomechanical studies in implantology. Thus, vari¬ations on implant applications and indications have been increased. In many cases, due to undesired angu-lations because of implantation or anatomical limita¬tions, implants can not be placed in desired direction. To eliminate these problems, angled abutment designs have been introduced by manufacturers to use. In implantology, angled abutment design is one of the biomechanical variables that has to be evaluated in the scientific area.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
İmplantolojide yapılan biyomekanik çalışmalar sonucunda, implant materyal ve dizaynlarında önemli gelişmeler sağlanmıştır. Dolayısıyla, diş hekimliğinde implant uygulamaları ve endikasyon çeşitliliği artmıştır. Pek çok vakada hatalı implantasyon veya anatomik yapıların sebep olduğu istenmeyen açılan-malar nedeniyle implantlar istenilen doğrultuda yer-leştirilememektedir. Bu olumsuzlukları gidermek amacıyla üretici firmalar tarafından açılı başlık tasarımları kullanıma sunulmuştur. Açılı başlık tasarımları implantolojide bilimsel değerlendirme gerekliliği olan biyomekanik değişkenlerden biridir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-implantolojide-acili-baslik-uygulamalari.pdf
  • 3
34-39
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Engelman M J. Clinical Decision Making And Treatment Planning İn Osseointegration. Quintessence Publishing Co.Chicago, 1996:59-115.
2. Misch C M. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. Mosby. St Louis, 1999: 279-313.
3. Schroeder A, Sutter F, Krekeler G. Oral Implantology. Thieme medical Publishers.
Newyork,1996:11-15.
4. Misch C E, Bidez M W. Implant protected occlus-sion a biomechanical rationale. Compend Educ dent 1994; 15 : 1330-43.
3. Bruggenkate C M, Sutter F, Oosterbeek H S, Schroeder A. Indications for angled implants. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67:85-93.
4. Pamir A, Yurdukoru B, Eskitaşçıoğlu G. Düz ve eğimli dental implantlar üzerinde fonksiyonel kuvvetlerin etkisinin araştırılması. Ankara Ü. Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 1996; 23: 81-85.
5. Clelland N L, Lee, J K, Bimbenet OC., Brantley
WA. A Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of angled abutments for an implant placed in the anterior maxilla. Journal of prosthodontics
1995; 4: 95-100.
6. Babbush, C A. Dental implants principles and prac¬tice, W.B. Saunders Co, U.S.A. 1991: 46-57.
7. Glantz PJ, Nılner K. Biomechanical aspects of pros¬thetic implant-borne reconstructions. Periodonto-
logy 2000 1998; 17: 119-124.
8. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseoin-tegrated prostheses, J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 843¬848.
9. Balshi T J., Ekfeldt A. Three year evaluation of Branemark implants connected to angulated abut¬ments. J.Oral Maxillofac Imp 1997; 12: 52-58.
10. Sonugelen
M.
, Artunç C, Aksoy S, Zor M. Açılı oral implantların alveol kemiğinde oluşturduğu ger¬ilim değişimleri. Ege Ü. Diş Hek. Fak. Der 1994;
15: 1-5.
11. Clleland N I, Gilat A. A Photoelastic and strain gauge analysis of angled abutments for an implant system, Journal Oral Maxillofacial Implantology
1997; 8: 541-548.
12. Dario L J. A maxillary implant overdenture that uti¬lizes angle-correcting abutments. J. Prosthodont
2002; 11: 41-46.
13. Sethi A, Kaus T, Sochor P, Axmann-Kremar D, Chanavaz M. Evolution of the concept of angulated abutments in implant dentistry: 14-year clinical data. Implant Dent 2002; 11: 41-51.
14. Eger D E, Gunsolley J C, Feldman S. Comparison of angled and standart abutments and their effect on clinical outcomes: a preliminary report. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 819-823.
15. Sethi A, Kaus T, Sochor P. The use of angulated abutments in implant dentistry: five - year clinical results oj an ongoing prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 801-810.
16. Butler B L, Suzuki C. Esthetic replacement of a maxillary central incisor with an ITI 15-degree angled implant: a case report. Int J Periodontics restorative Dent 1999; 19: 609-614.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com