You are here

Home » Content

ARK ŞEKİLLERİNE GÖRE ALT VE ÜST PROTEZLERİN OTURDUĞU ALANLARIN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

A COMPARISON OF THE BASAL SEAT AREAS OF THE MAXILLARY AND MANDIBULAR DENTURES ACCORDING TO ARCH SHAPES

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2005

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, measurement of the denture bearing areas of the maxillary and mandibular dentures according to different arch shapes (ovoid, square and tapering) were performed. The last impression was made from zinc oxide and eugenol impression paste of ninety edentulous patients with different arch shapes. The denture bearing area of the maxillary and mandibular cast was marked with an indelible pen. The rubber-base impression material was applied on the cast. The set rubber-base impression was divided into parts and pressed on the graph paper The outlines of each part were drawn on the graph paper and measured with a planimeter by the same operator. As a result of analysis of variance, there were statistical differences found between basal seat areas of the maxillary dentures according to the arch shapes (P<0.01). It was found that the mean denture bearing area in the edentulous maxillae was approximately 1.7 times greater than the area of the edentulous mandible.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, oval, kare ve üçgen gibi farklı alveolar ark şekillerinde olan üst ve alt tam protezlerin kapladığı alanın yüzey ölçümü ve bunların karşılaştırılması yapıldı. Farklı damak şekline sahip doksan hastanın çinko oksit öjenol ölçü maddesi ile alınan final ölçülerinden modeller hazırlandı. Dişsiz üst ve alt çene modelleri üzerinde protezin oturacağı alan işaretlendi. Sonra elastomerik ölçü maddesi bu kısma yayılarak sertleşmesi beklendi. Sertleşen ölçü maddesi parçalara ayrılarak grafik kağıdı üzerine konuldu, çevresi çizildi. Bu kısımlar planometre ile bir araştırmacı tarafından ölçüldü. Varyans analizi sonucunda, kret şekillerine göre üst protezlerin kapladığı alanlar arasında farklılık bulunmuştur (P<0.01). Üst protezin kapladığı alanın, alt protezin alanından yaklaşık 1.7 kat fazla olduğu tespit edilmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ark-sekillerine-gore-alt-ust-protezlerin-oturdugu-alanlarin-karsilastirilmasi.pdf
  • 1
29-33
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Lynde TA, Unger JW. Preparation of the denture-bearing area- an essential component of successful complete-denture treatment. Quintessence Int 1995;26(10):689-695.
2. Unger JW, Elinger CW, Gunsolley JC. An
Analysis of the effect of mandibular lengthonresidual ridgeloss in the edentulous patient. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:827-30.
3. Luthra SP.Measurement of the area of the maxillary basal seat for dentures. J Prosthet Dent
1973;30:25-27.
4. Tallgren A.The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers:A mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years.J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:120-32.
5. Watt DM, Likeman PR. Morphological changes in the denture bearing area following the extraction of maxillary teeth.Br Dent J
1974;136:225-35.
8. Heartwel CM,Rahn AO.Syllabus of Complete Dentures. 3th ed. Philadelphia:Lea and
Febiger,1980: 175-180,311-14,320-25.
9. Ellinger CW,Rayson JH,Terry JM,Rahn AO.Synopsis of complete dentures. London: Lea
and Febiger,1975:57-66,81,108-123.
10. Kawabe S. Kawabe's complete dentures. Tokyo: Ishiyaku Euro-America Inc, 1992.p.18,109.
11. Colon A, Kotwal K, Mangelsdorff AD. Analysis of the posterior palatal seal and the palatal form as related to the retention of complete dentures. J
Prosthet Dent 1982;47(1):23-27.
12. Zimmerman DE,Cotmore JM.Denture esthetics (I) Denture base contour. Quintessence Int
1982:543-49.
13. Wehner PJ,Hickey JC,Boucher CO.Selection of artificial teethJ Prosthet Dent 1967;18:222-32.
14. Pietrokovski J,Massler M:Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction.J Prosthet
Dent 1967;17:21.
15. Suenaga K, Sato T, Nishigawa G, Minagi S. Relationship between size of denture foundation area and resorption of alveolar ridge in the edentulous mandible. J Oral Rehabil
1997;24(4):315-319.
16. Johnson DL,Holt RA,Duncanson MG.Contours of the edentulous palate.JADA 1986;113:35-40.
17. Harvey WL,Hoffman W,Hochstetter R,Rouland D.Large edentulous ridges-Are they better for dentures than small ridges? J Prosthet Dent
1982;47:595.
6. Klemetti E, Lassila L, Lassilla V. Biometric design of complete dentures related to residual ridge resorption. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:281-84.
7. Hickey JC, Zarb GA.Boucher's prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 8th ed.St.Louis:C.V Mosby,1980:7,8,19,22-24.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com