You are here

Home » Content

KARADENİZ BÖLGESİ ÇOCUKLARINDA KONJENİTAL DAİMİ DİŞ EKSİKLİĞİ PREVALANSI

PREVALENCE OF CONGENITALLY MISSING PERMANENT TEETH IN BLACKSEA REGION CHILDREN

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and distribution of congenially missing permanent teeth, excluding the thrrd molars in B/acksea region children. Panoramic radiographs of 981 children (493 girls and 488 boys) between the ages of 6 and 12 years were examined in terms of congenttally missing permanent teeth. The data were statisticalty evaluated by Chi-Square ve t-test. The prevalence of congenttalty missing permanent teeth was 8.5% (7.7% for boys, 9.5% for girls) with no statistically significant difference between the sexes. The most commonly missing teeth were the mandibular second premolars, followed by the maxiilary lateral incisors, and the maxi/aary second premolars. Symmetrical hypodontia was predominant, and the most commonly symmetrical hypodontia was mandibular second premolar agenesis. Congenttally missing permanent teeth was observed more than mandibula to maxilla but there were no statistically significant difference between the jaws. The distribution of missing teeth was similar between the right and the left sides of the dental arches in each group of children. As a conclusion the determination of congenttalty missing permanent tooth in early period is important in terms of implementation of alternative treatment methods.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı; Karadeniz bölgesi çocuklarında, üçüncü büyük azı dişleri dışındaki, daimi dişlerin konjenital o/arak ekskkiiğnnnn prevalansını ve dağılımını beiirlemektir. Bu amaçla, 6-12 yaşaar arasındaki 981 çocuk hastanın (488 erkek, 493 kız) panoramik radyografları konjenttal daimi diş eksikiiği açısından değerlendirildi. Elde edilen veriler istatistiksel o/arak Chi-Square ve t-testi ile değerlendirildi. Araştırmada konjenttal daimi diş eksikiiği prevalansı % 8,5 oaarak bulundu (kzaarda %9,5 ve erkeklerde %7,7) ve cinsiyete göre istatistiksel fark gözlenmedi. En sık eksikiiği gözlenen diş/er sırası lle; alt ikinci küçük azı, üst yan kesici ve üst ikinci küçük azı o/arak tesptt edildi. Diş ekskkiiğnnnn sıklık/a simetrik olarak izlendiği, en sık simetrik diş eksikliğinin ise, alt ikinci küçük azı dişlerinde meydana geldiği belir/endi. Konjenttal daimi diş eksikliği alt çenede üst çeneye göre daha fazaa gözlenmesine rağmen, istatistiksel fark bulunamadı. Her iki grupta da sağ ve sol çene/erdeki eksik diş dağılım/arı ise benzer bulundu. Sonuç oaarak çocuk/ardaki diş eksikliği prevalansının erken dönemde belirlenmesi atternatff tedavi yaklaşımları açısından önemiidir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-karadeniz-bolgesi-cocuklarinda-konjenital-daimi-dis-eksikligi-prevalansi.pdf
  • 2
37-40
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Mcktbben DR, Brearley LJ. Radiographic determination of the prevalence of selected dental anomates nn children. J Dent Chid 1971;38:390¬8.
2. Locht S. Panoramic radiographic examination of 704 Danish children aged 9-10 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1980;8:375-80.
3. Buenvaaje TM, Rapp R. Dental anomalies in children: a clinical and radiographic survey. J Dent Chid 1984;51:42-6.
4. Pilo R, Kaffe I, Amir E, Sarnat H. Diagnosis of develepmental dental anomalies using panoromic radiographs. J Dent Chid1987;54:267-72
5. Uzamış M, Taner TU, Kansu Ö, Apar R. Evaluation of dental anomalies in 6-13 year old turkish children: a panoramic survey. J Marmara Un Dent Fac 2001;4:254-9.
6. Sumer P,
Akça T, Köprülü H. Çocuklarda görülen dental anomaliler: Panoromik radyografik değerlendrrme. Ondokuz Mayıs Univ Diş Hekim Fak Derg 2004;5:81-4.
7. Mu/er TP, Hill IN, Petersen AC, B/ayney JR. A survey of congenttally missing permanent teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1970;81:101-7.
8. Endo T, Ozoe R, Kubota M, Akiyama M, Shimooka S. A survey of hypodontia in Japanese orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:29-35.
9. Sı/va Meza R. Radiographic assessment of congenttalty missing teeth in orthodontic patients. Int J Paed Dent2003;13:112-6.
10. Davis PJ. Hypodontia and hyperdontia of permanent teeth nn Hong Kong schoolchildren. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1987;15:218-20.
11. Lynham A. Panoromic radiographic survey of hypodontia in Austraiaan Defence Force recruits. Aus Dent J 1989;35:19-22.
12. Makin M, Dummett CO, Weinberg R. A study of oligodontia in a sample of New Orleans children. J Dent Chid 1979;46:478-82.
13. Mahaney MC, Fujiwara TM, Morgan K. Dental agenesis nn the Dariusleut Hutterite Brethren: comparisons to selected Caucasoid population surveys. Am J Phys Anthropol 1990;82:165-77.
ŞEN TUNÇ, KOYUTÜRK
14. Knnde/an JD, Rysiecki G, Chlds WP. Hypodontia: genotype or environment? A case report of monozygotic twins. Br J Orthod1998;25:175-8.
15. Sperber GH. Anodontaa: Two cases of different etiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1963;16:73-82.
16. Arte S, Nieminen P, Pirinen S, Thes/eff I, Pettonen L. Gene defect nn hypodontia: exclusion of EGF, EGFR and FGF-3 as candidate genes. J Dent Res 1996;75:1346-52.
17. Goldenberg M, Das P, Messersmtth M, Stockton DW, Pate/ PI, D'Souza RN. Cii'nical, radiographic and genetic evaluation of novel form of autosomal-domnnant oligodontia. J Dent Res 2000;79:1469-75.
18. Nunn JH„ Carter NE, Gilgrass TJ, Hobson RS, Jepson NJ, Meechan JG, Nohl FS. The interdisciplinary management of hypodontia: background and role of paedaatric dentistry. Br Dent J 2003;194:245-51.
19. Poder BJ, Van't Hof MA, Van der Linden FPGM, Kujpers-Jagtman AM. A meta-anatyysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32:217-26.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com