You are here

Home » Content

Jenerik Rekabet Stratejilerinin İşletme Karlılığı ve Pazar Performansına Etkisi

Journal Name:

  • Yönetim-İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Porter considered that in the long term the extent to which the firm is able to follow a single strategy, either differentiation or low cost leadership, in an industry is a major determinant of the success with which it will out-perform its competitors. He also suggested that the firms which tried to combine the multiple strategies will have focus problems and show low performance since they would be stuck in the middle of both strategies. This paper examines whether single and multiple generic strategy choices create a significant difference between the firms in terms of profitability, market share growth rate and total sales growth rate, based on Porter's generic competitive strategy model. In order to classify the firms in terms of their strategic choices, "Generic Strategy Scale" developed by Yamin, Gunasekaran and Mavondo, was used. Results of the study which comprised of 157 firms have showed that the firms which could have combined multiple strategies effectively outperformed all other firms that adopted single strategies. However, the results also revealed that the firms which could have not adopted and applied any of the strategy (stuck in the middle ones), either differentiation or low cost leadership, effectively showed the lowest performance among the others.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Porter, işletmelerin uzun dönemde sürdürülebilir rekabet avantajını ancak ve ancak farklılaştırma ya da düşük maliyet liderliği olarak ifade edilen jenerik stratejilerden sadece bir tanesinin başarı ile uygulanması sayesinde elde edilebileceğini, çoklu seçimleri benimseyerek, farklı stratejileri kombine etmeye çalışan işletmelerin ise, hiçbir stratejiyi tam olarak uygulayamayarak, stratejik seçimler arasına sıkışıp (stuck in the middle) kalacaklarını iddia etmektedir. Bu araştırmada, Porter'ın rekabet modeli esas alınarak, tekli ya da çoklu jenerik strateji seçimlerinin işletmeler arası karlılık, pazar büyüme oranı ve toplam satış büyüme oranı kriterleri açısından performans farklılığı yaratıp yaratmadığı incelenmiştir. 157 işletme üzerinde Yamin, Gunasekaran ve Mavondo tarafından geliştirilen "Jenerik Strateji Ölçeği" kullanılarak gerçekleştirilen araştırma sonunda, hem farklılaştırma hem de düşük maliyet liderliği stratejilerini aynı anda izleyebilen işletmelerin, diğer işletmelere oranla hem karlılık hem de pazar performansı (pazar payı ve toplam satış büyüme oranı) açısından belirgin olarak daha başarılı olduğu ortaya çıkarken, ne düşük maliyet liderliği ne de farklılaştırma stratejilerinden herhangi birisini başarı ile uygulayamayan ve "arada sıkışıp kalanlar" olarak adlandırılan işletmelerin ise, gerek karlılık, gerekse pazar performanslarının diğer tüm işletmelere göre daha düşük olduğu belirlenmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-jenerik-rekabet-stratejilerinin-isletme-karliligi-pazar-performansina-etkisi.pdf
  • 65
47-63
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

AMBROSİNİ, V., BOWMAN, C, 2009, "What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management?", International Journal of Management Reviervs, 11(1), s:29-49.
AMBROSİNİ, V., BOWMAN, C, BURTON-TAYLOR, S., 2007, "Inter-team coordination activities as a source of customer satisfaction", Hııman Relations, 60, s:59-98.
ANG, S.H., WIGHT, A.M., 2009, "Building intangible resources: The stickiness of reputation", Corporate Reputation Review, 12(1), s:21-32.
ARMSTRONG, L., 1987, "Sony's Challenge", Business Week, 1 June, s:64-69. BAIN, J.S., 1959, Industrial Organization, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
CALOGHIROU, Y., PROTOGEROU, A., SPANOS, Y., PAPAGIANNAKIS, L., 2004, "Industry-versus fırm-specific effects on performance: Constrasting SMEs and large-sized firms", European Management Journal, 22, s:231-243.
CHEN, Y., FENG, J.L., 2006, "Sources of superiorperformance: Industry versus firm effects amongfirms in Taiwan", European Planning Studies, 14(6), s:733-751.
CLAVER, E., MOLINA, J., TARI, J., 2002, "Firm and industry effects on firm profitability: A Spanish empirical analysis", European Management Journal, 20, s:321-328.
COWLING, K., 1972, Market Structure and Corporate Behavior, Gary Mills, London.
CROOK, T.R., KETCHEN, D.J., COMBS, J.G., TODD, S.Y., 2008, "Strategic resources and performance: A meta analysis", Strategic Management Journal, 29, s:1141-1154.
DESS, G.G., DAVIS, P.S., 1984, "Porter's (1980) generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organisationalperformance", Academy of Management Journal, 27(3), s:467-488. DESS, G.G., ROBINSON, R.B., 1984, " Measuring organizationalperformance in the absence of objective measures: The case of privately-heldfirm and conglomerate business unit", Strategic Management Journal,
5, s:265-273.
DOUGLAS, S.P., RHEE, D.K., 1989, "Examining Generic Competitive Strategy Types in U.S. and European Markets", Journal of International Business Studies, Fall, s:437-463.
FAHY, J., 2002, "A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment", International Business Review, 11, s:57-78.
FOSS, N.J., KNUDSEN, T., 2003, "The resource-based tangle: Towards a sustainable explanation of competitive advantage", Managerial andDecision Economics, 24, s:291-307.
61
Rıfat Kamaşak Yönetim Yıl: 21 Sayı 65 Şubat 2010
GALBRAITH, C., SCHENDEL, D., 1983, "An empirical analysis of strategy types", Strategic Management Journal, 4, s:153-173.
GALBREATH, J., GALVIN, P., 2006, "Accounting for performance variation: how important are intangible resources?", International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 14(2), s:150-170.
GALBREATH, J., GALVIN, P., 2008, "Firm factors, industry structure and performance variation: New empirical evidence to a classic debate", Journal of Business Research, 61, s:109-117.
HALL, R., 1992, "The strategic analysis of intangible resources", Strategic Management Journal, 13, s:135-144.
HALL, R., 1993, "A frameıvork linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage", Strategic Management Journal, 14, s:607-618.
HAMBRICK, D., 1980, "Operationalizing the concept of business-level strategy in research", Academy of Management Review, 5, s:567-76.
HAMBRICK, D., 1985, "Strategies for mature industrial product businesses", In Grant, J. H. (Ed.), Strategic Management Frontiers, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, s:320-356.
HAWAWINI, G., SUBRAMANIAN, V., VERDIN, P., 2003, "Is performance driven by industry or firm specific factors? A new look at the evidence", Strategic Management Journal, 24, s:1-16.
JENNY, F., WEBER, A.P., 1976, "Profit rates and structural variables in French manufacturing industries", European Economic Review, 7, s:187-206.
KARNANI, A., 1984, "Generic competitive strategies-an analytical approach", Strategic Management Journal, 5, s:367-380.
LAMBIN, J.J. (Ed.), 1976, Advertising, Competition, and Market Conduct in Oligopoly over Time,
North Holland Publishing Co, Amsterdam.
LEVINTHAL, D.A., 1995, "Strategic management and exploration of diversity", In C. Montgomery (Ed.), Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm, Kluwer, Boston, MA, s:19-42.
LUMPKIN, G.T., DESS, G.G., 2006, "The Effect of 'Simplicity' on the Strategy-Performance Relationship: A Note", Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), s:1583-1604.
MAURI, A.J., MICHAELS, M.P., 1998, "Firm and industry effects within strategic management: An empirical examination", Strategic Management Journal, 19, s:211-219.
McGAHAN, A. M., 1999, "Competition, strategy, and business performance", California Management Revierv, 41, s:74-101.
62
Rıfat Kamaşak Yönetim Yıl: 21 Sayı 65 Şubat 2010
McNAMARA, G., AIME, F., VAALER, P.M., 2005, "Is performance driven by industry or firm specific factors? A response to Hawawini, Subramanian, and Verdin", Strategic Management Journal, 26, s:1075-1081.
MEHRA, A., 1996, "Resource and market based determinants of performance in the U.S. banking industry", Strategic Management Journal, 17, s:307-322.
MILES, R.E., SNOW, C.C. (Eds.), 1978, Organisational Strategy, Structure, and Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
MILLER, D., 1992, "The generic strategy trap", Journal of Business Strategy, January/February, s:37-41.
MILLER, D., FRIESEN, P., 1984, Organizations: A Quantum View, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
MILLER, D., FRIESEN, P.H., 1986, "Porter's (1980) Generic Strategies and performance: an empirical examination with American data: Part I: Testing Porter", Organization Studies, 7, s:37-55.
MITCHELL, R., 1987, "The health craze has Kellogg feeling, G-R-R-Reat", Business Week, 30 March, s:52-
53.
O'SCHAUNESSY, J., 1984, Competitive Marketing, Allen & Unwin, Boston, MA.
PHILLIPS, L.W., CHANG, D.R., BUZZELL, R.D., 1983, "Product quality, cost position and business performance: a test of some key hypotheses", Journal of Marketing, 47(2), s:26-43.
PORTER, M. E., 1980, Competitive strategy, The Free Press, New York, NY.
PORTER, M. E., 1985, Competitive advantage, The Free Press, New York, NY.
PORTER, M.E., 1996, "What is strategy?", HarvardBusiness Revierv, November-December, s:61-78.
POWELL, T.C., DENT-MICALLEF, A., 1997, "Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of Human, Business and Technology Resources", Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), s:375-405.
RUMELT, R.P., 1991, "How much does industry matterl", Strategic Management Journal, 12, s:167-185.
RUMELT, R.P., SCHENDEL, D., TEECE, D.J., 1991, "Strategic management and economics", Strategic Management Journal, 12, s:5-29.
SCHERER, F.M., 1980, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
63
Rıfat Kamaşak Yönetim Yıl: 21 Sayı 65 Şubat 2010
SHORT, J.C., KETCHEN, D.J., PALMER, T.B., HULT, G.T. M., 2007, "Firm, strategic group, and industry influences on performance", Strategic Management Journal, 28, s:147-167.
SPANOS, Y.E., LIOUKAS, S., 2001, "An examination of the causal logic of rent generation: Contrasting Porter's competitive strategy frameıvork and the resource-based perspective", Strategic Management
Journal, 22, s:907-934.
TREACY, M., WIERSEMA, F., 1995, The Discipline of Market Leaders, Reading, MA: Addision Wesley.
VENKATRAMAN, N., RAMANUJAM, V., 1987, "Measurement of business economic performance: An examination of methodconvergence", Journal of Management, 13, s:109-122.
WELBOURNE, T.M., WRIGHT, P.M., 1997, "Which resources matter in initialpublic offering firms? A longitudinal comparison offive resources' contributions to firm performance", Working Paper 97-02, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
WERNERFELT, B., MONTGOMERY, C.A., 1988, "Tobin's q and the importance of focus in firm performance", American Economic Revierv, 78, s:246-250.
WHITE, R.E., 1986, "Generic business strategies, organisational context and performance: an empirical investigation", Strategic management Journal, 7, s:217-231.
WRIGHT, P., KNOLL, M., CADDIE, B., PRINGLE, C., 1990, "Strategicprofile, market share and business performance", Industrial Management, 32(3), s:23-28.
YAMIN, S., GUNASEKARAN A., MAVONDO, F.T., 1999, "Relationship betıveen generic strategies, competitive advantage and organizationalperformance: an empirical analysis", Technovation, 19(8), s:507-518.
YETTON, P., CRAIG, J., DAVIS, J., HILMER, F., 1992, "Are dimonds a country's best friend? A critique of Porter's theory of national competition as applied to Canada, New Zealand and Australia", Australian Journal of Management, 17(1), s:89-120.
ZANDER, U., KOGUT, B., 1995, "Knoıvledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test", Organization Science, 6, s:76-92.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com