You are here

Home » Content

Türkiye’de Sanayi Bölgelerinin Özellikleri ve Ekonomik Performansı Arasındaki İlişkiler: İmalat Sanayi Örneği

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS: THE CASE STUDY OF MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY

Journal Name:

  • Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Ekonomik coğrafya yazınında; bölgedeki ekonomik faaliyetlerin niteliksel olarak yoğunlaşmasının, bölgenin ekonomik performansına tek başına pozitif katkı sağlamayacağı ve niteliksel olarak yoğunlaşmanın yanı sıra mekânsal ve sosyal faktörlerin de etkili olacağı konusunda bir fikir birliği söz konusudur. Bu bağlamda çalışma, “imalat sanayinin ekonomik performansı ile imalat sanayinin ekonomik ve ekonomik olmayan özellikleri arasında pozitif ilişki vardır” varsayımına dayandırılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’de Nuts I düzeyindeki istatistikî bölgelerin imalat sanayi performansı ile özellikleri arasındaki ilişkilerin, istatistikî analiz-yöntem teknikleriyle belirlemektir. Bu kapsamda; Türkiye’de imalat sanayi performansı imalat sanayide elde edilen katma değer açısından değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmada, Türkiye’de bulunan 81 bölgenin imalat sanayi ekonomik performansı ile özellikleri arasındaki ilişkiler istatistikî analiz-yöntem teknikleriyle incelenmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, Türkiye’de imalat sanayi ekonomik performans ile özellikler arasında pozitif yönlü bir ilişkinin olduğunu tespit edilmiştir.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
In economic geography literature, there is a consensus that qualitative concentration of economic activities in a region does not contribute solely to the economic performance of the region and that spatial and social factors are also effective as well as qualitative concentration of economic activities. In this context, the study depends on the assumpti on that “there is a positive relation between economic performance of manufacturing industry and economic and non-economic characteristics of the manufacturing industry”. The aim of this study is to examine whether a relation between economic performance of manufacturing industry and economic and non-economic characteristics of the manufacturing industry in the case study of a statistical region called NUT 1 in Turkey. In this context, the performance of manufacturing industry in Turkey is evaluated in ter ms of economic value added. In this study, the relation between economic performance and characteristics of the manufacturing industry are analyzed by using statistical methods. As the result of this study, it is confirmed that there is a positive relation between economic performance of manufacturing industry and economic and non-economic characteristics of the manufacturing industry
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-turkiyede-sanayi-bolgelerinin-ozellikleri-ekonomik-performansi-arasindaki-iliskiler-imalat-sanayi-ornegi.pdf
  • 1
115-139
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

AKGÜNGÖR, Sedef and Pınar FALCIOĞLU (2005), “Türkiye’de İmalat
Sanayinde Bölgesel Uzmanlaşma ve Sanayi Kümeleri”, Pamukkale Üniversitesi
Kentsel Ekonomik Araştırmalar Sempozyumu’05, Denizli.
AMIN, Ash (1999), “An Institutionalist Perspective on Regional Economics
Development”, International Journal Urban and Regional Research, Vol 23; 365-378.
C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt 13, Sayı 1, 2012 137
Anonim, (2006), “Bölgesel Kalkınma Araştırma Raporu”, KOSGEB,
Ankara.
Anonim, (2010), “OSB Mevzuatı”, Organize Sanayi Bölgeleri Derneği
Yayınları, Ankara.
ARMSTRONG, Harvey and Jim TAYLOR (2000), Regional Economics and
Policy, Wiley-Blackwell Publications, London.
BARBER, William J. (2007), History Of Economic Thought, Wesleyan
University Press, Middletown.
BECATTINI, Giacomo and Gabi Dei OTTATI (2005), “The Performance of
Italian Industrial Districts and Large Enterprise Areas in the 1990s”, European
Planning Studies, Vol 14; 1139-1162.
BENDAVID-VAL, Avrom (1991), Regional and Local Economic Analysis
for Practitioners, Fourth Edition Praeger Press, London.
BENNEWORTH, Paul and Nick HENRY (2004), “Where is the Value
Added in the Cluster Approach? Hermeneustic Theorising Economic Geography
and Clusters as a Multiperspectival Approach”, Urban Studies, Vol 41; 1011-1023.
BOSCHMA, Ron and Anet WETERINGS (2004), “The Effect of Regional
Differences on the Performance of Software Firms in the Netherlands”, Paper
prepared for the European Regional Science Association (ERSA) Congress 25-29
August 2004, Porto.
CUMBERS, Andrew; Danny MACKINNON and Robert MCMASTER
(2003), “Institutions, Power and Space; Assessing the Limits to Institutionalism in
Economic Geography”, European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol 10; 325-342.
ECERAL, Tanyel (2006), “Ekonomik Coğrafya Kurumsal Yaklaşım: Denizli
Örneği”, in Değişen Mekan: Mekansal Süreçlere İlişkin Tartışma ve Araştırmalara
Toplu Bakış: 1923-2003 (derleyen: A. Eraydın), Dost Kitabevi Yayınları, Ankara;
458-480.
ELSNER, Wolfram (2000), “An Industrial Policy Agenda 2000 and Beyond:
Experience, Theory and Policy”, in Industrial Policies after 2000 (Edt. W. Elsner
and J. Groenewegen), Kluwer Academic Publications, London; 411-486
ERAYDIN, Ayda and Bernard FINGLETON (2006), “Network Relations
and Local Economic Development: Some Causes of Differentiated Network
Structures and Intensities Among Turkish Industrial Firms”, Environment and
Planning A, Vol 38; 1171-1186.
ERAYDIN, Ayda (1992), Post Fordizm ve Değişen Mekansal Öncelikler,
ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Yayınları, Ankara.
138 KARAKAYACI
ERAYDIN, Ayda (1999), “Sanayinin Anadolu’ya Yaygınlaşması ve Son
Dönemde Gelişen Yeni Sanayi Odakları”, in 75 Yılda Çarklardan Chip’lere (edt.
O. Baydar), Tarih Vakfı Yayınları, İstanbul; 257-277.
ERAYDIN, Ayda (2002), Yeni Sanayi Odakları: Yerel Kalkınmanın
Yeniden Kavramlaştırılması, ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Yayınları, Ankara.
ERENDIL, Asuman (1998), “Using Critical Realist Approach in
Geographical Research: An Attempt to Analyze the Transforming Nature of
Production and Reproduction in Denizli”, Unpublished PhD, METU, Ankara.
GREENE, William (2003), Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall 5th Edition,
New York University, New York.
KAMBHAMPATI, Uma and Philip MCCANN (2007), “Regional
Performance and Characteristics of Indian Manufacturing Industry”, Regional
Studies, Vol 41; 281-294.
KIM, Sukkoo (1997), “Regions, Resources and Economic Geography:
Sources of U.S. Regional Comparative Advantage, 1880-1987”, Regional Science
and Urban Economics, Vol 29; 1-32.
LEVY, John (1985), Urban and Metropolitan Economics, McGraw Hill
Publications, New York.
MARKUSEN, Ann (1996), “Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of
Industrial Districts”, Economic Geography, Vol 72; 293-313.
MCCANN, Philip (2001), Urban and Regional Economics, Oxford
University Press, Oxford.
MUTLUER, Mustafa (2003), “Türkiye’de Yeni Gelişen Sanayi Odakları:
Denizli, Gaziantep, Çorum”, Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, Cilt 12; 13-27.
ÖZCAN, Gül Berna (1995), Small Firms and Local Economic Development,
Published by Avebury, Aldershot.
PALUZIE, Elisenda; Jordi PONS and Daniel A. TIRADO (2001), “Regional
Integration and Specialization Patterns in Spain”, Regional Studies, Vol 35; 285-296.
PIORE, Michael and Charles SABEL (1984), The Second Industrial Divide:
Possibilities for Prosperity, Basic Books, New York.
PORTER, Michael. (2003), “The Economic Performance of Regions”,
Regional Studies, Vol 37; 549-578.
SCHMITZ, Hubert and Khalid NADVI (1999), “Clustering and
Industrialization: Introduction”, World Development, Vol 27; 1503-1514.
C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt 13, Sayı 1, 2012 139
SCHMITZ, Hubert and Bernard MUSYCK (1994), “Industrial districts in
Europe: policy lessons for developing countries?”, World Development, Vol 22;
889-910.
SCOTT, Allen John (2000), “Economic Geography: The Great Half-Century”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol 24; 483-504.
STORPER, Michael (1999), “The Resurgence of Regional Economies, Ten
Years Later: The Region as a Nexus of Untraded Interdependencies”, in The
Economic Geography Reader (edt. J. Bryson, N. Henry, D. Keeble, and R. Martin),
John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., New York; 209-215

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com