You are here

Home » Content

Participation of the young ones in virtual worlds: a look at experiences and motivations

Journal Name:

  • World Journal on Educational Technology

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Virtual worlds have become very popular and there have been some attempts to find the motivations and experiences of using them. The aim of this paper is to analyze the motivations and experiences of young ones to utilize virtual worlds. The paper identifies the activities that children perform in virtual worlds, features they use as well as the reasons for abandoning these virtual worlds. The paper presents results of a qualitative field study. The results indicate that features that are liked in the virtual worlds are similar to games. The most liked features for virtual worlds were developing characters and doing things in groups. The activities that were liked the most in virtual worlds were: chatting or doing different things with friends; playing games; and exploring new places. The main reasons to abandon virtual worlds were increased needs for social networking and better gaming experiences. Students showed interest in using games and virtual worlds at schools, but were generally rather skeptic about this possibility.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_159831_3_pp_16-27.pdf
  • 1
16-27
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Barab, S., Warren, S. and Ingram-Goble, A. (2008). Conceptual play spaces. (Eds. Ferdig, R.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (pp. 1-20). Pennsylvania: IGI Global publications.
Bartle, R. (1996). Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: players who suit MUDs. The Journal of Virtual Environments, 1 (1).
Bell, M. W. (2008). Toward a definition of “virtual worlds”. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1 (1). Retrieved July 30, 2010, from http://journals.tdl.org/jvwr/article/view/283/237.
Dalgarno, B. (2002). The potential of 3d virtual learning environments: A constructivist analysis. Electronic Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 5(2).
Entertainment Software Association [ESA]. (2009). Essential facts about the computer and video game industry: 2009 sales, demographic and usage data. Retrieved July 30, 2010, from http://www.theesa.com/facts/pdfs/ESA_EF_2009.pdf.
Habbo. (2008). Habbo’s second Global Youth Survey reveals the digital profiles of teens online. Retrieved July 30, 2010, from http://www.sulake.com/press/releases/2008-04-03-Global_Habbo_Youth_Surve....
KZero. (2008a). The updated Universe graph for Q3 2008. Retrieved July 30, 2010, from http://www.kzero.co.uk/blog/?p=2485.
KZero. (2008b). Habbo Global Youth Survey – Tri-country analysis. Retrieved July 30, 2010, from http://www.kzero.co.uk/blog/?p=2613.
KZero. (2009). Updated KZero Universe chart for Q1 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2010, from http://www.kzero.co.uk/blog/?p=2700.
Martinez-Jimenez, P., Pontes-Pedrajas, A., Polo, J. and Climent-Bellido, M. S. (2003). Learning in chemistry with virtual laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(3), 346-352.
Salovaara, A., Johnson, M., Toiskallio, K., Tiitta, S. and Turpeinen, M. (2005). Playmakers in multiplayer game communities: their importance and motivations for participation. Article presented at the ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technologies (ACE 2005), ACM, New York, USA.
Schroeder, R. (1996). Possible worlds: the social dynamic of virtual reality technologies. Boulder: Westview Press.
Schroeder, R. (2006). Being there and the future of connected presence. Journal of Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15(4), 438-454.
Schuurman, D., De Moor, K., De Marez, L. and Van Looy, J. (2008). Fanboys, competers, escapists and time-killers: a typology based on gamers' motivations for playing video games. Article presented at the 3rd International Conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts, ACM, New York, USA.
Sherry, J. L., Lucas, K., Greenberg, B. S. and Lachlan, K. (2006). Video game uses and gratifications as predictors of use and game preference. (Eds. Vorderer, P. and Bryant, J.), Playing video games: motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 248-262). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Spence, J. (2008). Demographics of virtual worlds. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1 (2). Retrieved July 30, 2010, from http://journals.tdl.org/jvwr/article/view/360/272.
Ahmer Iqbal, Marja Kankaanranta, Pekka Neittaanmäki / World Journal on Educational Technology (2011) 16-27
27
Steinkuehler, C. and Williams, D. (2006). Where everybody knows your (screen) name: online games as “third places”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (4).
Tarng, W. and H. Liou. 2007. The development of a virtual dinosaur museum. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35 (4): 385-409.
Tychsen, A., Hitchens, M. and Brolund, T. (2008). Motivations for play in computer role-playing games. Article presented at the Conference on Future Play: Research, Play, Share, ACM, New York, USA.
Wetsch, L. R. (2008). The “new” virtual consumer: Exploring the experiences of new users. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1 (2). Retrieved July 30, 2010, from http://journals.tdl.org/jvwr/article/view/361/273.
Yee, N. (2005). Motivations of play in online games. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 9, 772-775.
Zumbach J., Schmitt, S., Reimann, P. and Starkloff, P. (2006). Learning life sciences: design and development of a virtual molecular biology learning lab. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25 (3), 281-300.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com