You are here

New Technologies for Motor Didactics

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Today's multimedia environments and information technologies represents a very effective tool to facilitating the processes of teaching and learning in schools, in the same way other technologies today available on the market, could hide some peculiarities and potentiality very useful for didactics process. Aim of the article is to analyze some instrument, chosen based on their potential and applicability in educational contexts, with special regards to the motor learning. It was decided to discuss here only two technologies selected for the high degree of involvement of motor skills that they make it possible. The two technologies that will be presented here are: (1) Kinect (2) Nirvana. Highly immersive didactic environments, such as those achievable through the use of the technologies mentioned above, could facilitate access to knowledge and give a valid assistance as high degree of involvement.
154-159

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Antinucci F. La scuola si è rotta, Laterza, Bari, 2001.
2. Bandura A. Social learning theory, Prentice Hall, Upper
Saddle River, New Jersey, 1977.
3. Bosio P, Menegoi Buzzi DI. Scuola e diversità in
Europa. Strumenti per la formazione dei docenti
sull’integrazione dei disabili in Europa, Milano, Franco
Angeli, 2005.
4. Bruner JS. The culture of education, Harvard University
Press, Cambridge (Mass.) – London, 1996.
5. Bruner J. La ricerca del significato. Per una psicologia
culturale, Bollati Boringheri, 1992.
6. Calvani A. Costruttivismo, progettazione didattica e
tecnologie, in D. Bramanti (a cura di) Progettazione
formativa e valutazione, Carocci, Roma, 1998.
7. Carassa A, Morganti F, Tirassa M. A situated cognition
perspective on presence. In B. Bara, L.W. Barsalou, M.
Bucciarelli(Eds.), XXVII Annual Conference of
Cognitive Science Society. Alpha, NJ: Sheridan
Printing, 384-389, 2005.
8. Carassa A, Morganti F, Tirassa M. Movement, Action,
and Situation:Presence in Virtual Environment. In M.
Alcaniz Raya, B. Rey Solaz (Eds), Seventh Annual
International Workshop Presence 2004. Valencia
UPV,7-12: Editorial, 2004.
9. Gardner H. Intelligenze multiple, Anabasi, Milano, 1994.
10. Gibson JJ. The ecological approach to visual perception,
Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1979.
11. Hughes M, Lipoma M, Sibilio M. La performance
analysis. elementi di base ed aspetti applicativi in campo
educativo ed integrativo. Milano: Franco Angeli, 2009.
12. Lodrini T. Didattica costruttivista e ipermedia, F. Angeli,
Milano, 2002.
13. Machlup F. The Production and Distribution of Knowledge
in the United States, Princeton: Princeton University
Press, 1962.
14. Morganti F, Riva G. Conoscenza, comunicazione e
tecnologia,Milano: LED Edizioni Universitarie, 2006.
15. Novak J. L’apprendimento significativo, Erickson, Trento,
2001.
16. Puglisi F. Biomeccanica introduzione alle misure strumentali
di postura e movimento, Roma, Marrapese, 2007.
17. Riva G. Psicologia dei nuovi media,Il Mulino, Bologna,
2008.
18. Tarr MJ, Warren WH. Virtual Reality in behavioral
neuroscience and beyond, Nature Publishing Group, 2002.
19. Varisco BM. Alle radici dell’ipertestualità, in A. Calvani e
B.M. Varisco (a cura di), Costruire/decostruire significati,
CLEUP, Padova, 1995.
20. Varisco BM. Costruttivismo socio-culturale, Carocci,
Roma, 2002.
21. Vigotskji LS. Il processo cognitivo, Boringheri, Torino,
1980.
22. Villani D, Grassi A, Riva G. Tecnologie emotive: nuovi
media per migliorare la qualità della vita e ridurre lo stress,
LED, Milano, 2011.
23. Wenger E. Communities of practice. Learning meaning and
identity, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
24. Wiederhold BK, Widerhold MD. Virtual Reality
Therapy for Anxiety Disorders, Advances in Education and
Treatment. American Psychological Association Press,
New York, 2004.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com