You are here

Comparison of pregnancy outcome of diabetic and non diabetic pregnancy at rural tertiary hospital in Bangalore

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Background: Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) pose an important health problem because diabetes not only affects the maternal and fetal outcome, but these women and their fetuses are also at an increased risk of developing diabetes and related complications later in their life. The study was conducted to determine the maternal and fetal outcomes of 50 diabetic vs. 50 normoglycemic pregnancies. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective analytical record-based study conducted in a tertiary level hospital mvj medical college and research hospital. Detailed information regarding maternal, fetal, and labor outcome parameters was recorded in a prestructured proforma and compared in normoglycemic and diabetic pregnancies. Results: Patients with obesity, history of diabetes in the family, spontaneous abortions, and gestational diabetes in previous pregnancies had a greater incidence of GDM in current pregnancy (P<0.05 for all). Hypertension, polyhydramnios, macrosomia, fetopelvic disproportion, and cesarean sections were more (P<0.001) among diabetic pregnancies. Congenital anomalies, polycythemia, hypocalcaemia, and hyperbilirubinemia were also observed to be more (P<0.05) in neonates born to diabetics, suggesting an adverse effect of hyperglycemia in utero. Conclusion: Diabetes during pregnancy is associated with higher maternal and fetal morbidity. Therefore, early screening, detection, close monitoring, and intervention is essential to reduce maternal and fetal short- and long-term adverse effects, especially in high-risk groups. Pregnancy provides an opportunity to the clinician to control the disease process and inculcate healthy lifestyle practices in these patients.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
1076-1083

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Seshiah V, Balaji V, Balaji MS, Sanjeevi CB, Green A. Gestational diabetes mellitus in India. J Assoc Physicians
India. 2004;52:707–11.
2. Naylor CD, Sermer M, Chen E, Farine D. Selective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus.Toronto Trihospital
Gestational Diabetes Project Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1591–6.
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG
Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 30, September 2001
(replaces Technical Bulletin Number 200, December 1994). Gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:525–38.
4. National Diabetes Data Group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose
intolerance. Diabetes. 1979;28:1039–57.
5. Phelan JP, Ahn MO, Smith CV, Rutherford SE, Anderson E. Amniotic fluid index measurements during
pregnancy. J Reprod Med. 1987;32:601–4.
6. Ballard JL, Rosenn B, Khoury JC, Miodovnik M. Diabetic fetal macrosomia: Significance of disproportionate
growth. J Pediatr. 1993;122:115–9.
7. Shefali AK, Kavitha M, Deepa R, Mohan V. Pregnancy outcomes in pre-gestational and gestational diabetic
women in comparison to non-diabetic women- A prospective study in Asian Indian mothers (CURES-35) J Assoc
Physicians India. 2006;54:613–8.
8. Kadiyala R, Peter R, Okosieme OE. Thyroid dysfunction in patients with diabetes: Clinical implications and
screening strategies. Int J Clin Pract. 2010;64:1130–9.
9. Ylinen K, Aula P, Steinman UH, Kesaniemi-Kuokkanen T, Teramo K. Risk of minor and major fetal
malformations in diabetics with high haemoglobin A1c values in early pregnancy. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)
1984;289:345–6.
10. Moses RG, Cheung NW. Point: Universal screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care.
2009;32:1349–51.
11. Berger H, Sermer M. Counterpoint: Selective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care.
2009;32:1352–4

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com