You are here

Home » Content

Conceptualizations of representation forms and knowledge organization of high school teachers in Finland: “magnetostatics”

Journal Name:

  • European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
One of the main components of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge refers to their use of representation forms. In a similar vein, organizing concepts logically and meaningfully is an essential element of teachers’ subject matter knowledge. Since subject matter and pedagogical content knowledge of teachers are tightly connected as categories forming their knowledge base, it is reasonable to expect that representation forms and organization of knowledge are related. In order to find out how far these two facets depend on each other, two Finnish upper secondary physics teachers’ answers to an electronic questionnaire were analysed as case studies. Questions varied from teachers’ organization of knowledge to their representation forms regarding the topics of “magnetic flux density” and “Ampère’s law.” A concept map constructed by one teacher, led us to an improved description of teachers’ knowledge organization. In addition, observed and analysed lessons given by the second teacher shed light on representation forms. Organization of knowledge of the studied topics was investigated by means of recognizing the core concepts, and then interrelations between the other concepts. So, the study could advise physics teacher to more systematically plan and organize their teaching of the studied topics. Other findings illuminate useful representation forms that physics teachers apply during their teaching such as suiting experiments, explanations, and models. Thus, our conceptualization emphasize for teachers to reflect on effective ways to organize their knowledge and, consequently, to select adequate representation forms.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon 4.pdf
  • 2
69-83
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on Science Teacher Knowledge. In Abell, S. K., Lederman, N. G. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on
Science Education, Ed., Chapter 36, (pp. 1103-1149). New York: Routledge.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, L. A., and Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C.:
National Academy Press.
Carter, K. (1990). Teachers’ knowledge and learning to teach. In W. R. Houston & M. H. J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of research on
teacher education (pp. 291-310). New York: Micmillan.
Erickson, G. (1994). Pupils’ understanding magnetism in a practical assessment context: The relationship between content,
process and progression. In P. Fensham, R. Gunstone, & R. White (Eds.), The content of science. London: Falmer.
Geddis, A. N. and Wood, E. (1997). Transforming Subject Matter and Managing Dilemmas: A Case Study in Teacher Education.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 611-626.
Guisasola. J., Almudì. J. M., and Zubimendi, J. L. (2004). Difficulties in learning the introductory magnetic field theory in the
first years of university. Science Education, 88, 443-464.
Hashweh, M. Z. (2005). Teacher Pedagogical Constructions: A reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers
and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11, 273–292
Hatakka, J., Saari, H, Sirviö, J.,Viiri, J, and Yrjänäinen, S. (2008). Physica 7, Sähkömagnetismi. Porvoo: WSOY Oppimateriaalit.
Hay, D. B., Harvey, W., and Kinchin, I. M. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative measures of student learning at university level,
Higher Education, 56, 221–239.
Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks principle. Review of Educational
Research, 60, 419-469.
Kinchin, I. M., Hay, D. B., and Adams, A. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid
learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research, 42 (1), 43-57.
Koponen, I. T., and Pehkonen, M. (2010). Coherent Knowledge Structures of Physics Represented as Concept Networks in
Teacher Education. Science & Education, 19, 259-282.
European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Vol. 1, No. 2, 2013 83
Loughran, J. Mulhall, P. and Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of
articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 41, 370-391.
Majidi, S. and Mäntylä, T. (2011). The knowledge organization in physics textbooks: A case study of magnetostatics. Journal of
Baltic Science Education, 10(4), 285-299.
Majidi, S. (2012). Structural patterns and representation forms of university physics teachers: Biot-Savart Law and Ampère’s
law. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11 (4), 318-332.
Manogue, C. A., Browne, K., Dray, T., and Edwards, B. (2006). Why is Ampère’s law so hard? A look at middle-division
physics. American Journal of Physics, 74, 344-350.
Mäntylä, T. (2011). Didactical Reconstruction of Processes in Knowledge Construction: Pre-service Physics Teachers Learning
the Law of Electromagnetic Induction. Research in Science Education, 42, 791-812.
Novak, J. D., and Canas, A. J. (2006). The Origins of the Concept Mapping Tool and the Continuing Evolution of the Tool.
Information Visualization, 5, 175-184.
Rollnick, M., Bennett, J., Rhemtulaa, M., Dharseyc, N., and Ndlovua, T. (2008). The Place of Subject Matter Knowledge in
Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A case study of South African teachers teaching the amount of substance and chemical
equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1365-1387.
Rollnick, M., Mundalamo, F., and Booth, S. (2012). Concept Maps as Expressions of Teachers’ Meaning–Making while
Beginning to Teach Semiconductors. Research in Science Education, 10.1007/s11165-012-9314-1
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Stoddart, T., Abrams, R., Gasper, E., and Canady, D. (2000). Concept maps as assessment in science inquiry learning—a report
of methodology. International Journal of Science Education, 22(12), 1221–1246.
Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) Advance 2008. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss_advanced
/downloads/T08_TeacherQ-Physics.pdf
van Driel, J., Verloop, N., and de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge, Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com