You are here

Home » Content

THE HYPOTHESIS OF INNOVATION-BASED ECONOMIC GROWTH: A CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP

Journal Name:

  • Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Theoretically, the innovation-based growth hypothesis suggests that there is a positive linkage between innovation and economic growth. R&D plays a major role in innovation, raising productivity and increasing economic growth. In this study, this hypothesis is tested empiricially. The paper examines the causal relationship between R&D expenditures and economic growth. We apply our methodology, based on the standart Granger and Toda-Yamamoto tests for causality, to time-series data covering the period 1981-2008 for nine European countries. In consideration of standart Granger causality test, our empirical findings clearly exhibit that R&D expenditures cause GDP in the cases of Finland, France and Spain. The results also indicate that GDP causes R&D expenditures in Denmark and there is no causality between variables in other countries. On the other hand, the results of Toda-Yamamoto test imply that there is no causality between R&D expenditures and GDP in Holland, Ireland and Italy. However, there is bi-directional causality in Finland and France. Empirical results also indicate that there is a causal relationship between variables running from R&D expenditures to GDP for Austria, while the direction of causality is from GDP to R&D expenditures for Denmark, Spain and Portugal. Consequently, this study provides further evidence supporting the hypothesis for some European countries.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Teorik olarak yenilik odaklı büyüme hipotezi, yenilik ile ekonomik büyüme arasında pozitif bir ilişkinin olduğunu kabul eder. AR-GE yeniliklerde, verimlilik ve ekonomik büyümenin artırılmasında temel bir rol oynar. Çalışmada bu hipotez ampirik olarak test edilmektedir. Bu makale, AR-GE harcamaları ile eko-nomik büyüme arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisini inceler. Metodoloji, standart Granger ve Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik testlerine dayanır ve 1981-2009 periyoduna yönelik dokuz AB ükesini içerir. Standart Granger nedensellik testleri dikkate alındığında, ampirik bulgular Finlandiya, Fransa ve İspanya örneğin-de AR-GE harcamalarının GSYİH’ya neden olduğunu göstermektedir. Danimarka ekonomisinde GSYİH AR-GE harcamalarına neden olurken, diğer ülkelerde nedensellik ilişkisi söz konusu değildir. Diğer taraf-tan Toda-Yamamoto test sonuçları ise Hollanda, İrlanda ve İtalya’da AR-GE harcamaları ile GSYİH ara-sında bir nedensellik ilişkisinin olmadığını göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte Finlandiya ve Fransa’da çift yönlü nedenselliğe rastlanmıştır. Ampirik sonuçlar Avusturya için AR-GE harcamalarından GSYİH’ya doğru, Danimarka, İspanya ve Portekiz için GSYİH’dan AR-GE harcamalarına doğru bir nedensellik iliş-kisini ortaya koymaktadır. Sonuç olarak bu çalışma, bazı AB ülkeleri için hipotezi destekleyici kanıtlar sunmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_194000_6_pp_1-16.pdf
  • 11
1-16
  • English

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

AGHION, P. ve P. HOWITT (1992), “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction”, Econometrica, 60 (2), 323-351.
AHMAD, J. S. ve S. M. ALERASOUL (2009), “R&D and Economic Growth: New Evidence from Some Developing Countries”, Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(4), 3464-3469.
AIGINGER, K. ve M. FALK (2005), “Explaining Differences in Economic Growth among OECD Countries”, Empirica, 32, 19-43.
ANTONELLI, C. (2009), “The Economics of Innovation: From the Classical Legacies to the Economics of Complexity”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(7), 611-646.
ARROW, K. J. (1962), “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing”, The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155-173.
ASHEIM, B.T. (2001), “Localiced Learning, Innovation and Regional Clusters”, in Cluster Policies-Cluster Development?, Edited by Age Mariussen, Stockholm, Nordregio Report, 39-58.
BIRSDALL, N. ve C. RHEE (1993), “Does Research and Development Contribute to Economic Growth in Developing Countries?”, Policy Research Working Paper 1221, Washington, D.C., The World Bank (November).
CONTE, A. (2006), “The Evolution of the Literature on Technological Change over Time: A Survey”, Discussion Papers on Entrepreneurship, 107, 1-74.
DICKEY, D. A. ve W. A. FULLER (1981), “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for an Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Econometrica, 49, 1057-1072.
DINOPOULOS, E. ve F. ŞENER (2007), “New Directions in Schumpeterian Growth Theory”, http://bear.warrington.ufl.edu/dinopoulos/pdf/ schumpeterian growth.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 27.02.2011.
DOLADO, J.J. ve H. LUTKEPOHL (1996), “Making Wald Tests Work for Cointegrated VAR Systems”, Econometric Reviews, 15(4), 369-386.
EATON, J. ve S. KORTUM (1996), “Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD”, Journal of International Economics, 40, 251-278.
EUROSTAT http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/ home/, Erişim Tarihi: 12.05.2010.
FABRICANT, S. (1954), Economic Progress and Economic Change, 34th Report of the National Bureau of Economic Research (New York: NBER)
Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi 15
Yıl:6 Sayı:11, Yaz 2013 ISSN 1307-9832
FELDMAN, M. (2004), “Significance of Innovation”, Paper prepared for the Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies”, 1-14. http://www.competeprosper.ca/
images/uploads/Feldman_WIM_ Summary_ 2005. pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 25.03.2011.
FRAUMENI, B. M. ve S. OKUBO (2004), “R&D in the National Income and Product Accounts: A First Look at its Effect on GDP”, Paper presented at the CRIW Conference, Measuring Capital in the New Economy. Washington, D.C., Ap-ril 2003.
GOEL, R. K. ve R. RAM (1994), “Research and Development Expenditures and Economic Growth: A Cross-country Study”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 42, 403-411.
GRANGER, C.W.J. (1969), “Investigating Causal Relation by Econometric and Cross-Sectional Method”, Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.
GRIFFITH, R., REDDING, S. ve J. Van REENEN (2000), “Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries”, The Institute of Fiscal Studies Working Paper, W00/2, London.
GRILICHES, Z. (1992), “The Search for R&D Spillovers”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 29-47.
GROSSMAN, G.M. ve E. HELPMAN (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
GROSSE, T. G. (2008), “What’s Next for the Lisbon Strategy?”, The Institute of Public Affairs, 3, 1-11.
HOWITT, P. (1999), “Steady Endogenous Growth with Population and R&D Inputs Growing”, Journal of Political Economy, 107, 715-730.
HSE (2007), The Implications of R&D off-shoring on the innovation capacity of EU firms, Helsinki School of Helsinki.
HSIAO, C. (1981), “Autoregressive Modeling and Money-Income Causality Detection”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 7(1), 85-106.
LEBEL, P. (2008), “The Role of Creative Innovation in Economic Growth: Some International Comparisons”, Journal of Asian Economics, 19(4), 334-347.
MANSFIELD, E. (1972), “Contribution of Research and Development to Economic Growth of the United States”, Papers and Proceedings of a Colloquim on Research and Development and Economic Growth Productivity, National Science Foundation, Washington DC.
OECD (2003), The Sources of Economic Growth in the OECD Countries. OECD. Paris.Available at: http://www1.oecd.org/publications/ebook/1103011E.PDF (Last accessed 10th September 2005)
16 International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies
Year:6 Number 11, Summer 2013 ISSN 1307-9832
OECD (2005a), Innovation Policies: Innovation in the Business Sector. OECD, Paris.
OECD (2005b), Oslo Manual, Guidelines Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, Third Edition, Paris: OECD.
RAJEEV, K., GOEL, J. E. ve R. RAM (2008), “R&D Expenditures and U.S. Economic Growth: A Disaggregated Approach”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 30, 237-250.
ROMER, P. M. (1986), “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037.
ROMER, P. M. (1990), “Endogenous Technological Change”, Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71-102.
SOLOW, R. (1956), “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65-94.
SOLOW, R. (1957), “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312-320.
SWAN, T. W. (1956), “Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation”, Economic Record, 32(63), 334-361.
TODA, H. Y. ve T. YAMAMOTO (1995), “Statistical Inference in Vector Autoregressions with Possibly Integrated Processes”, Journal of Econometrics, 66(1-2), 225-250.
UNITED NATIONS STATISTICS DIVISION, http://unstats.un.org/unsd/
databases.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 23.01.2010
YANRUI, W. (2010), “Innovation and Economic Growth in China”, Business School The University of Western Australia, Discussion paper 10.10, 1-30.
YUEN, P. H., POH, K. W. ve H. T. MUN (2009), “The Impact of R&D on the Singapore Economy: An Empirical Evaluation”, The Singapore Economic Review, 54(1), 1-20.
ZACHARIADIS, M. (2003), “R&D, Innovation, and Technological Progress: A test of the Schumpeterian Framework without Scale Effects”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 36(3), 566-5

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com