You are here

Home » Content

SINIF III MALOKLÜZYONLARIN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ VE SINIF III HASTALARIN KAMUFLAJ TEDAVİSİ (3 Olgu Sunumu)

Evaluation of Class III Malocclusions and Camuflage Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion (Three Case Reports)

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Class III malocclusion and camuflage treatment of 3 patients with severe Class III malocclusion and concave facial profile were evaluated in this case report. Patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion were treated in 2 phases of the permanent dentition. In phase 1, maxillary protraction was combined with rapid palatal expansion; in phase 2, fixed appliances were used. At the end of the orthodontic treatment, bilateral canine-molar protected occlusion with adequate anterior guidance was established and normal overjet and overbite. A combination of maxillary protraction and rapid maxillary expansion is an efficient treatment alternative for camuflage in moderate Class III patients in order to obtain good occlusal relationships. In our cases, we achieved a favorable treatment result with the face-mask appliance and fixed appliance treatment.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu vaka raporunda genel olarak sınıf III maloklüzyonlar ve konkav profile sahip 3 hastanın kamuflaj tedavisi değerlendirilmiştir. Hastaların tedavileri iki aşamalı olarak yapılmıştır. İlk aşama üst çenenin genişletilmesi ve protraksiyonu, ikinci aşama ise sabit ortodontik tedavi uygulanmıştır. Tedavi sonunda, yeterli kesici rehberliği ile birlikte ideal overbite, overjet ilişkisi, ayrıca çift taraflı kanin ve molar koruyuculuğunda oklüzyon sağlanmıştır. Sınıf III maloklüzyonlu hastaların tedavisinde üst çenenin genişletilmesi ve öne alınması, ideal bir oklüzyonun sağlanması için cerrahi yaklaşıma alternatif bir tedavidir. Sunulan olgularda sabit ortodontik tedavi ve yüz maskesinin kullanılması ile olumlu sonuç alınmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-sinif-iii-malokluzyonlarin-degerlendirilmesi-sinif-iii-hastalarin-kamuflaj-tedavisi-3-olgu-sunumu.pdf
  • 3
55
60
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Arslan Gündüz S, Kama Devecioğlu
J
. Early treatment of skeletal Class III ano-malyies: (case report). Turk Ortodonti Derg, 2004; 17(1): 89-98.
2.
Aru
n T, Enverdi N. An alternative method to correct Class III maloclusion: early treatment. Turk Ortodonti Derg, 1997; 10(3):
279-84.
3.
Benyahi
a H, Azaroual MF, Garcia C, Hamou E, Abouqal R, Zaoui F. Treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusions orthognathic surgery or orthodontic camouflage? How to decide. Int Orthod, 2011; Jun; 9(2): 196-209.
4.
Massle
r M, Frankel J.M. Prevalance of malocclusion in children aged 14 to 18 years. Am J Orthod, 1951; (37): 751-68.
5.
Hube
r JH, Reynolds JW. A dentofacial study of male students at the University of Michigan in the Physical Hardening Program. Am J Orthod Oral Surg, 1946; (32):
1-21.
6.
Tro
y BA, Shanker S, Fields HW, Vig K,
Johnston W. Comparison of incisor inclina¬tion in patients with Class III malocclusion treated with orthognathic surgery or ortho¬dontic camouflage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009 Feb; 135(2): 146, e1-9; Discussion 146-47.
7.
L
e Gall M, Philip C, Salvadori A. Early treatment of Class III malocclusion. Orthodontics (Chic.), 2011; Sep; 82(3): 241-52.
8.
Battage
l J. The aetiological factors in Class III malocclusion. Eur J Orthod, 1993;
(15): 347-70.
9.
Ch
i B, King T, Proffit W, Frazier-Bo-wers S. Phenotypic characterization of Class III patients. Angle Orthod, 2006; 76(4): 564¬69.
10.
Chan
g HP, Tseng YC, Chang HF. Treatment of mandibular prognathism, J Formos Med Assoc, 2006 Oct; 105 (10): 781-90.
11. Başçiftçi
FA
, Orhan M, Uçkan S, Üşümez S. Combined orthodontic-surgical approaches in skeletal Class III cases: two case reports. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci,
2001; (7): 138-44.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com