You are here

Home » Content

AKRILIK TAM PROTEZLERDE KIRIK

ACRYLIC COMPLETE DENTURE DAMAGES

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2008

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Denture fracture is one of the most frequent problem that cause financial and emotional consequences for dentist and patient. The present study was conducted to determine the types of fracture by questionnaires to one hundred and fifty patients who apply to Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Istanbul with damaged denture. Results showed that the upper complete dentures were more prone to denture fracture. Fractured and cracked complete dentures had been in use frequently more than 3 years. Damages mostly occur in the mouth while chewing. The midline fractures were more commonly seen.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Protez kırıkları oldukça sık görülen, hasta ve hekim için hem maddi, hem de manevi sıkıntılar getiren sorunlardan biridir. Bu araştırma ile İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Total Parsiyel Protezler Bilim Dalı'na protez kırılması şikayeti ile başvuran toplam 150 hasta anket yöntemiyle incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına gore en fazla kırığa maruz kalan protez tipi üst tam protezlerdir. Kırık ve çatlak protezler genellikle 3 yıldan uzun zamandır kullanılmaktadır. Kırık genellikle çiğneme sırasında ve orta hatta gerçekleşmektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-akrilik-tam-protezlerde-kirik.pdf
  • 1-2
45
49
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1.
Saydam G, Oktay I, Möller I. Türkiye'de Ağız Diş Sağlığı Durum Analizi. Sağlık Bakanlığı ve Dünya Sağlık Örgütü tarafından desteklenen Ulusal Ağız Diş Sağlığı Yönlendirici Araştırmasının Sonuçları. İstanbul: 1990.
2. Basker RM ve Davenport JC. Prosthetic Treatment of the Edentulous Patient. Fourth edition. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard, 2002,
p. 289-295.
3. Craig RG, Powers JM, Wataha JC. Dental materials. Properties and Manipulation. Seventh Edition. St Louis: Mosby. 2000, p. 257-274.
4. Roberts TA. Dental composites. In: Kelly A, editor. Concise encyclopedia of composite materials. Oxford : Pergamon Pres, 1989, p. 71¬3.
5. Matthews E, Wain FA. Stresses in denture
bases. Br Dent J, 1956: 100: 167-171.
6. Beyli MS, von Fraunhofer JA. An analysis of causes of fracture of acrylic resin dentures. J
Prosthet Dent, 1981: 46: 238-241.
49
7. Yli-Urpo A, Lappalainen R, Huuskonen O. Frequency of damage to and need for repairs of removable dentures. Proc Finn Dent Soc, 1985:
81: 151-155.
8. Valittu PK, Lassila VP, Lappalainen R. Evaluation of damage to removable dentures in two cities in Finland. Acta Odontol Scand,
1993: 51: 363-369.
9. Hargreaves AS. The prevalance of fractured dentures-a survey. Br Dent J, 1969: 126: 451¬455.
10. Smith DC. The acrylic denture: mechanical evaluation mid-line fracture. Br Dent J, 1961:
110: 257-267.
11. Nakazawa I. A clinical survey of removable partial dentures-analysis of follow up examination over sixteen year period. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ, 1977: 24: 125-137.
12. Darbar UR, Huggett R, Harrison A. Denture fracture-a survey. Br Dent J, 1994: 176: 342¬345.
13. Lamb DJ, Ellis B, van Noort R. The fracture topography of acrylic dentures broken in service. Biomaterials, 1985: 6: 110-112.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com