You are here

Home » Content

K URUMSAL SOSYAL SORUMLULUK K AVRAMI VE GEL ISMEK TE OLAN ÜLK ELERDE KONUYA BAK IS

Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility and a Perspectiveon the Issue in Develoiing Country Context

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
While determining their area of responsibilities, companies, attempt to develop their operations by taking opinions and expectations of all stakeholder groups in their complicated business networks into consideration. One of the questions here to answer is whether the companies exist to meet the expectations and needs of the community and the individuals or the community and the individuals exist for meeting the needs of the company. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) implementations, which develop within this framework, are especially worth to pay attention in the context of developing countries as these countries inherit a high potential in terms of market dynamics while, at the same time, do have a highly volatile market structure. Basing on this notion, this study first argues the conceptual framework and importance of CSR as a concept; then attempts to explain some important theoretical foundations coming from “Institutional Theory”, “Stakeholder Approach” and “Strategic Perspective”; and finally presents a brief look on certain implications of the issue in developing country context.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Isletmelerin, sorumluluk alanlarini belirlerken, giderek karmasiklasan isletme agindaki tüm paydas gruplarinin görüslerini ve beklentilerini dikkate alarak faaliyetlerini gelistirmeleri önem tasimaktadir. Bu dogrultuda cevaplanmasi gereken sorulardan biri, firmalarin mi toplumun ve bireyin ihtiyaçlarini karsilamak için var oldugu, yoksa birey ve toplumun mu firmalarin devamli ligi için var oldugu sorusudur. Bu çerçevede gelisen Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk (KSS) uygulamalari, özellikle, pazar dinamikleri bakimindan önemli bir potansiyel içeren ama ayni ölçüde kirilgan bir yapida olan, gelismekte olan ülkeler baglaminda dikkat çekmektedir. Bu düsünceyi esas alarak gerçeklestirilen çalismada, öncelikle, KSS’nin kavramsal çerçevesi, kapsami ve önemi tartisilacak, ardindan; “Kurumsallasma Teorisi”, “Paydas Yaklasimi” ve “Stratejik Yaklasim”in KSS anlayisi için olusturdugu teorik temeller açiklanacak ve son olarak, konunun gelismekte olan ülkelerde nasil ele alindigina deginilecektir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-k-urumsal-sosyal-sorumluluk-k-avrami-gel-ismek-te-olan-ulk-elerde-konuya-bak.pdf
  • 43
135-162
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Araya, M. 2006. Exploring Terra Incognita: Non-financial Reporting in
Latin America. 21, Spring: 25–38.
Baughn, C., Bodie, N., McIntosh, J. 2007. Corporate Social and
Environmental Responsibility in Asian Countries and Other Geographical
Regions.
. 14 (4): 189–205.
Bowen, H. 1953. , USA:
Harper&Brothers.
Carroll, A.B. 1979. A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate
Performance. . 4(4): 497-505.
Carroll, A.B. 1991. The Pyramid Of Corporate Social Responsibility:
Toward The Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders.
. 39-48.
Carroll, A.B. 1999. Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a
Definitional Construct. , 38(3): 268-295.
Carroll, A.B. ve Buchholtz. 2003.
. 5.bs., USA: Thompson-Southwestern
Publishing
Chapple, W. ve Moon, J. 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in
Asia: A Seven-Country Study of CSR Web Site Reporting.
, 44(4): 415-441.
Cruz L.B., vd. (2006), “Towards Sustainable Development Strategies: A
Complex View Following the Contribution of Edgar Morin”,
, 44(7): 871-891.
Dobers, P. Ve Halme, M. 2009. Corporate Social Responsibility and
Developing Countries.
. 16: 237–249.
Elkeiy M. 2005. Give and Take, , Financial Times Press,
February Issue.
Eren, E. 2000, , Istanbul: Beta
Yayinevi.
Eweje, G. 2006. The Role of MNEs in Community Development Initiatives
in Developing Countries: Corporate Social Responsibility at Work in
Nigeria and South Africa. 45(2): 93-129.
Freeman, R.E ve Reed, D.L. 1983. Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New
Perspective on Corporate Governance.
25(3): 88-106.
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C. ve Parmer, B. 2004. Stakeholder Theory and
"The Corporate Objective Revisited". 15(3): 364-
369.
Friedman, M. 1970. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its
Profits, , 33: 122–126.
Frooman, J. 1999. Stakeholder Influence Strategies
24(2): 191-205.
Frynas, J.G. 2005. The false developmental promise of Corporate Social
Responsibility: Evidence From Multinational Oil Companies.
81(3): 581-598.
Gardiner, L., Rubbens, C ve Bonfiglioli, E. (2003) “Big Business, Big
Responsibilities”, . 3 (3) :67-77.
Godfrey, P.J. ve Hatch, N.W. 2007. Researching Corporate Social
Responsibility: An Agenda for the 21st Century,
, 70: 87-98.
Hatcher, M. 2002. New Corporate Agendas, ,
3(1): 32-38.
Henriques, I. ve Sadorsky, H. (1996). The Determenants of
Environmentally Responsibel Firm. Journal of Environmental Economics
and Management. 30 (3): ss. 381- 395.
Ite, U.E., 2004. Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility In
Developing Countries: A Case Study of Nigeria.
11: 1-11.
Jamali, D. 2007. The Case for Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility in
Developing Countries. 112 (1):1-27.
Jamali, D. 2008. A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social
Responsibility: A Fresh Perspective into Theory and Practice.
, 82: 213–231.
Jennings, P.D. ve Zandbergen, P.A. 1995. Ecologically Sustainable
Organization An Institutional Approach.
, 20(4):1015-1052.
Jepperson, R. L. 1991. Institutions,Institutional Effects,and Institutionalism.
W. Powell ve P.J. Dimaggio (Der.),
. Chicago: The University Of Chicago Press: 143-
163.
Kotler, P. ve Lee, N. 2005. (Çeviri :Sibel
Kaçamak). Istanbul: MediaCat Yayinlari.
Küskü, F. ve Zarkada-Fraser, A. (2004) An Emprical Investication of
Corporate Citizenship in Australia and Turkey.
. 15: 57-72.
Küskü, F. (2007) From Neccesity to Responsibility: Evidence for Corporate
Environmental Citizenship Activities from a Developing Country
Perspective.
. 14: 74-87.
Lamberti, L. ve Lettieri, E. 2009. CSR Practices and Corporate Strategy:
Evidence from a Longitudinal Case Study, ,
87: 153–168.
Lantos, G. P. 2001. The Boundaries of Strategic Corporate Social
Responsibility. 18(7): 595–630.
Longo, M., Mura, M. ve Bonoli, A. 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility
and Corporate Performance: The Case of Italian SMEs,
5(4): 28–42.
Maignan, I., Ferrell, O.C. ve Ferrell,L. 2005. A Stakeholder Model for
Implementing Social Responsibility in Marketing.
, 39 (9/10): 956-977.
Martinet A. C. ve Reynaud, E. 2004. Entreprise durable, Finance et
Stratégie,
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
Corporate Social
Responsibility and Environmental Management,
Business and Society Review,
Journal of
BusinessEthics
Academy of Management
Review
The New Institut ionalism In
Organization Analysis
K urumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk
Br itish Journal of
Management
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental
Management
Journal of Business Ethics
Journal of Consumer Marketing.
Corporate
Governance,
European Journal of
Marketing
RevueFrançaise deGestion.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com