Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

FARKLI LİSE TÜRLERİNDEKİ ÖĞRENCİLERİN ÖĞRENME STİLLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA (RİZE İLİ ÖRNEĞİ)

A STUDY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LYCEE TYPES AND LEARNING STYLES

Journal Name:

  • Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2007

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study has been conducted to investigate the learning styles of high school students differentiated in terms of their school types in Rize. The scale -Marmara Learning Styles Scale (MLSS)- which was used in this study developed in Turkey by Otrar M. (2006). And it has been used to determine learning styles. And in addition to this scale, a questionnaire developed by the researchers was also used to collect the demographic data. The study was performed in the second semester of 2006-2007 educational year and carried out on 828 high school students (339 female and 489 male; ages ranged from 15 to 18) participating from 11 different high schools in Rize. For processes on data analyzing, descriptive techniques (f, %) were used. Furthermore, to find out the differences between the groups, independent samples t test, one-way anova, and LSD analysis were carried out. In this respect, some of the major findings of the research are presented in the following: (a) there are significant differences between school types for the sub-scales of social interaction, tactility, visuality, illumination, authority, auditory, persistence of MLSS. (b) there are significant differences between gender groups for the sub-scale of visuality of MLSS. (c) there are significant differences between school types for the sub-scales of visuality, authority, auditory of MLSS.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Araştırmanın amacı Rize İli'nde farklı türdeki ortaöğretim kurumlarında öğrenim görmekte olan öğrencilerin öğrenme stillerinin incelenmesidir. Öğrencilerin öğrenme stillerinin belirlenmesinde Otrar (2006) tarafından geliştirilen ve sekiz alt boyut içeren Marmara Öğrenme Stilleri Ölçeği (ÖSÖ-M), demografik bilgiler için de araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen bir form kullanılmıştır. Uygulamalar 2006-2007 eğitim öğretim yılında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu araştırmanın örneklemini Rize İli'nde küme örnekleme yoluyla seçilen on bir farklı ortaöğretim kurumunda öğrenim görmekte olan öğrenciler oluşturmaktadır. Örneklem yaşları 15 ila 18 arasında değişen 828 (339 kız, 489 erkek) ortaöğretim öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Araştırmada verilerin analizi kapsamında betimleyici analizlerin (f, %) yanı sıra bağımsız grup t testi ve tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA), LSD teknikleriyle de gruplar arasındaki farklılaşmalar sulanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda başlıca şu bulgular elde edilmiştir (a)sosyal etkileşim, dokunsallık, görsellik, aydınlatma, otorite, işitsellik ve sebat alt boyutlarında alt boyutlarında okul türleri arasında anlamlı farklılıklar olduğu saptanmıştır. (b) Görsellik alt boyutu için cinsiyet grupları arasında anlamlı farklılıklar olduğu saptanmıştır. (c) Görsellik, otorite, işitsellik alt boyutları için sınıf tekrarı yapan ve yapmayan öğrenciler arasında anlamlı farklılıklar olduğu saptanmıştır. Araştırmanın sonunda elde edilen sonuçlara bağlı olarak öğrenme süreci ve rehberlik açısından bazı önerilerde bulunulmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-farkli-lise-turlerindeki-ogrencilerin-ogrenme-stilleri-uzerine-bir-arastirma-rize-ili-ornegi.pdf
  • 25
140
170
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Alferink, L.A.
(2007)
. Educational practices, superstitious behavior and mythed opportunities. The sqentific Review of Mental Health Practice, Vol: 5-2, 21-30.
Babadoğan, C. (1994). Öğrenme stilleri ve stratejileri arasındaki ilişki. Bildiriler: 1. eğitim bilimleri kongresi, kuram-uygulama-araştırma, eğitimde psikolojik hizmetler, eğitim programları ve öğretim içinde (s. 1056-1065). Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi.
Biggs, J. B. (1994). Approaches to learning: nature and measurement of. In The international encyclopedia of education (Vol. I, pp. 319-322). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Boydak, A. (2001).
Öğrenme
stilleri. İstanbul: Beyaz Yayınları.
Bransford, J. D., Brown A. L., & Cocking R. R. (Eds). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. USA: Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, National Research Council.
Brunner, C.E. & Majevski, W.S. (1990). Mildly handicapped students can succeed with learning styles." Educational Leadership Vol 48, 21-23.
Cano-Garcia, F., & Hughes, E. H. (2000). Learning and thinking styles: An analysis of their interrelationship and influence on academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 20 (4), 413-430.
David W. Chan (2001). Learning styles of gifted and nongifted secondary students in hong kong. Gifted Child Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 1, 35-44.
Dunn R., Dunn K. & Price G.E. (1989) Learning styles inventory. Price Systems, Lawrence,
KS, USA.
Dunn, R., & Shea, T. C. (1991). Learning style and equal protection: The next frontier. Clearing House, 65 (2), 93-96.
Dunn, R. D., & Dunn, K. J. (1992). Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles: A practical approach. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Dunn, R., & Griggs, S. A. (1993). A meta-analytic validation of the Dunn and Dunn model of learning-style preferences. Journal of Educational Research, 88 (6), 353-363.
Dunn, R., & Ingham, J. (1994). Effects of matching and mismatching corporate employees' perceptual preferences and instructional strategies on training achievement and attitudes. Journal of Applied Business Research, 11 (3), 30-38.
Dunn, R.; Griggs, S.A.; Olson, J.; Gorman, B. & Beasley, M. (1995). A meta-analytic validation of Dunn and Dunn learning styles model. Journal of Educational Research Vol:88, 353-361.
167
Dunn, R., & Stevenson, J. M. (1997). Teaching diverse collage students to study within a learning styles prescription. College Student Journal, 31 (3), 333-339.
Dunn, R., & Stevenson, J. M. (1997). Teaching diverse collage students to study within a learning styles prescription. College Student Journal, 31 (3), 333-339.
Dunn, R., & Griggs, S. (1998). Learning styles: Link between teaching and learning. In Dunn, R. & Griggs, S. (Eds.), Learning styles and the nursing profession (pp. 11¬23). New York: NLN Press.
Dunn, R. (2000). Learning styles: Theory, research, and practice. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 13, (1), 3-22.
Driver, R. & Erickson, G. (1983). Theories-in-action: some theoretical and empirical issues in the study of students' conceptual frameworks in science. Studies in Science Education, 10, 37-60.
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P. & Wood-Robinson, V. (1993). Making sense of secondary science: research in the children's ideas . London: Routledge.
Eisa M. B. (2007). Learning styles in relation to academic performance in middle school mathematics. Digest of Middle East Studies, Vol:16-1, 42-57.
Erica A. W., Heidi L.L. & Stephen E. D. (2007). Gender differences in learning style preferences among undergraduate physiology students. Advances. Physiology Education Vol: 31, 153-157.
Gallaher, P.E. (1992) "Individual differences in nonverbal behavior: dimensions of style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol: 63, 133-145.
Geisert, G., & Dunn, R. (1991). Effective use of computers: Assignments based on individual learning style. Clearing House, 64 (4), 219-225.
Grigerenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Thinking styles. In (Eds.) D. H. Saklofske, & M. Zeidner International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 205-230). New York: Plenum Press.
Guilford, J. P. (1980). Cognitive styles, what are they? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 715-735.
Hlavaty, H. (2002). Comparative analysis of the learning styles of german adolescents by age, gender, and academic achievement level. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New Orleans, LA, April 1-5, 2002).
Hong, E. & Suh, B. (1995). An analysis of change in Korean-American and Koreans'students learning styles. PsycologicalReports, Vol:76, 691-699.
168
Honigsfeld, A.M. (2001). A comparative analysis of the learning styles of adolescents from diverse nations by age, gender, academic achievement level and nationality. (Doctoral Dissetation, St.John's University) Dissertation Abstract International, DAI-A 62/03, p.969.
Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Individual differences: Learning and instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kaplan, E. J., & Kies, D. A. (1995). Teaching styles and learning styles: Which came first? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 22 (1), 29-34.
Karasar, N., (2004). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
Klavas, A. (1994). In Greensboro, North Carolina: learning styles boosts achievement and test scores. The Clearing House, Vol:67, 149-151
Lister, D., & Ansalone, G. (2006). Utilizing modality theory to achieve academic success. Educational Research Quarterly, Vol. 30.2, 19-29.
Loo, R. (2002, May-June). A meta-analytic examination of Kolb's learning style preferences among business majors. Journal of Education for Business, 77, 252-256.
Martinsen, O. (1994). Cognitive style and insight. Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway.
MacGillivary, W.W. (1981). The contribution of perceptual style to to human performance. In I.M. Cockerill & W.W. MacGillivary (Eds.), Vision and Sport. London: Stanley Thornes, 1981, 8-16.
Messick, S. (1994). The manner of style: Manifestations of personality in cognition, learning, and teaching. Educational Psychologist, 29 (3), 121-136.
Miller, A. (1987). Cognitive styles, an integrated model. Educational Psychology, 7, 251¬268.
Miller, A. (1991). Personality types, learning styles and educational goals. Educational Psychology, 11, 217-238.
Molallem, M. (2007). Accommodating individual differences in the design of online learning environments: a comparative study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. Vol: 40(2), 217-245.
Murray-Harvey, R. (1994). Learning styles and approaches to learning: Distinguishing between concepts and instruments. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64,
373-388.
Otrar, M. (2006).
Öğrenme
stilleri ile yetenekler, akademik
başarı
ve
ÖSS başarısı arasındaki ilişki. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
169
Otrar, M. (2007). Marmara
Öğrenm
e Stilleri Ölçeğinin (ÖSÖ-M) geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. İstanbul: EDAM Sayı 3-7,
Eylül 2007, 1402-1419.
Rayner, S.,
&
Riding, R. (1997). Towards a categorisation of cognitive styles and learning styles. Educational Psychology, 17 (1-2), 5-27.
Rayner, S. (2000). Reconstructing Style Differences in Thinking and Learning: Profiling Learning Performance. In R. J. Riding & S.G. Rayner (Eds.), International Perspectives on Individual Differences. Stamford Connecticut: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Riding, R. J., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11, 193-215.
Riding, R.J. (1991). Cognitive Styles Analysis. Birmingham: Learning and Training Technology.
Sabin,
E.S
. & Geert T. M. Ten Dam. (1994). Gender differences in learning styles: A narrative review and quantitative meta-analysis. Higher Education. Vol. 27-4 , 487¬501
Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R., Schulze, S., & John. J. (1995) Students' understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4 (2), 131-166.
Shaughnessy, M. F. (1998). An interwiev with Rita Dunn about learning styles. Clearing House, Vol: 71-3, 141-146.
TDK. (2005).
Türk
Dil Kurumu sözlüğü. Ankara: TDK.
Ülgen, G. (1997). Eğitim psikolojisi. İstanbul: Alkım Yayınevi.
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2000). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Yong, F.,
&
N.
Ewing
. (1992). A comparative study of the learning-style preferences among gifted African-American, Mexican-American and American born Chinese middle-grade students. Roeper Review Vol:14-3, 120-123.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com