Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

EKONOMİK ÖZGÜRLÜKLERDEKİ YAKINSAMANIN HALDANE-HALL YAKLAŞIMI İLE ÖLÇÜMÜ

THE MEASUREMENT OF CONVERGENCE OF ECONOMIC FREEDOMS WITH HALDANE-HALL APPROACH

Journal Name:

  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
One of the most important developments in the last thirty years is the expansion of liberal economic thought and policies in terms of accelerating globalization movements. Libertarian movements the scope of which has been extended with regards to economics and especially neo-liberal movements became an irreplaceable element of social set-up and their economic liberation formed the main core of the developments of macroeconomics with the aim of increasing the welfare level. In this study, therefore, whether developing and underdeveloped countries came closer to developed countries in terms of economic freedom is analysed with a new method that is Haldane-Hall Convergence Analysis. The outcomes of Haldane-Hall Convergence Analysis revealed that the economic liberation processes of Argentina, Belarus, Bolivia, Bulgaria, China, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, India, Mexico, Papua New Guinea, Romania, Senegal, Thailand and Turkey converged to developed countries, on the other hand, in Republic of Congo, Ghana, Iraq, Jordan, Libya, Moldova, Morocco, Sudan, Swaziland, Vietnam, Yemen, Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Chad, Democratic Republic of Congo, Gambia, Guinea, Madagascar, Mali, Mozambique, Sierra Leone and Uganda, the concept of divergence in terms of economic freedom became a current issue.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Son otuz yıldan bu yana yaşanan en önemli gelişmelerden biri, hızlanan küreselleşme hareketleri kapsamında liberal iktisadi düşünce ve politikaların dünya genelinde yayılması olmuştur. Özellikle neo-liberal hareketler ile birlikte iktisadi bakımdan kapsamı genişletilen özgürlükçü akımlar, toplumsal yapılanma tarafından vazgeçilmez bir unsur olmuş ve ekonomik serbesti, refah gücünün artırılabilmesi amacıyla makro iktisadi gelişmelerin ana eksenini oluşturmuştur. Dolayısıyla bu çalışmada, gelişmekte olan ve azgelişmiş ülkelerin gelişmiş ülkelere ekonomik özgürlükler bakımından yaklaşıp yaklaşmadıkları yeni bir yöntem olan Haldane-Hall Yakınsama Analizi ile incelenmiştir. Haldane-Hall yakınsama analizi sonuçları; Arjantin, Belarus, Bolivya, Bulgaristan, Çin, Ekvador, Mısır, El Salvador, Hindistan, Meksika, Papua Yeni Gine, Romanya, Senegal, Tayland ve Türkiye’deki ekonomik özgürlük süreçlerinin gelişmiş ülkelere yakınsadığını; buna karşın Kongo Cumhuriyeti, Gana, Irak, Ürdün, Libya, Moldova, Fas, Sudan, Svaziland, Vietnam, Yemen, Bangladeş, Burkina Faso, Çad, Demokratik Kongo Cumhuriyeti, Gambiya, Gine, Madagaskar, Mali, Mozambik, Sierra Leone ve Uganda’da ise ekonomik özgürlükler bakımından ıraksama olgusunun gündeme geldiğini ortaya koymuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ekonomik-ozgurluklerdeki-yakinsamanin-haldane-hall-yaklasimi-ile-olcumu.pdf
  • 2
193
212
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Alston, P. (1990). U.S. ratification of the covenant on economic, social and
cultural rights: The need for an entirely new strategy. The American Journal of
International Law, 84 (2): 365-393.
Assane, D. ve Grammy, A. (2003). Institutional framework and economic
development: International evidence. Applied Economics, 35 (17): 1811-1817.
Baliamoune-Lutz, M. (2006). Opennes, growth and income convergence in
Africa. http://www.etsg.org/ETSG2006/papers/Baliamoune.pdf (30.04.2013).
Barro, R. J. (2001). Human capital and growth. The American Economic
Review, 91 (2): 12-17.
Barzel, Y. (2002). A theory of the state: economic rights, legal rights and
the scope of the state. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cole, J. H. (2005). Economic freedom and world economic growth:
Evidence and implications. RLDE Revista Latinoamericana de Desarrollo
Económico, (5): 101-125.
Connors, J. (2012). Economic freedom, democracy and economic
performance. Duke University Working Paper, No. 26: 1-19.
Daintith, T. (2004). Constitutional protection of economic rights.
International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2 (1): 56-90.
Datta, A. (2003). Time-series tests of convergence and transitional
dynamics. Economics Letters, 81 (2): 233-240.
Dickey, D. A. ve Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for
autoregressive series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical
Association, 74 (366): 427-431.
Dickey, D. A. ve Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for
autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49 (4): 1057-1072.
Drake, L. (1995). Testing for convergence between UK regional house
prices. Regional Studies, 29 (4): 357-366.
Dursun, İ. (2002). Ekonomik özgürlükler-ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi:
Teorik ve uygulamalı bir inceleme. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Dokuz Eylül
Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir.
Elert, N. ve Halvarsson, D. (2012). Economic freedom and institutional
convergence. Ratio Working Paper, No. 196: 1-30.
Friedman, M. (2002). Economic freedom behind the scenes. J. Gwartney,
R. Lawson, C. Edwards, W. Park, V. Rugy ve S. Wagh (Der.). Economic freedom
of the world: 2002 annual report: İçinde xvii-xxi. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.Fung, M. K. (2009). Financial development and economic growth:
Convergence or divergence. Journal of International Money and Finance, 28 (1):
56-67.
Gorga, C. (1999). Toward the definition of economic rights. Journal of
Markets & Morality, 2 (1): 88-101.
Granger, C. W. J. ve Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in
econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2 (2): 111-120.
Gurgul, H. ve Lach, L. (2011). The nexus between economic freedom and
growth: Evidence from CEE countries in transition. MPRA Working Paper, No.
37434: 1-25.
Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., Park, W. ve Skipton, C. (2001). Economic
freedom of the world: 2001 annual report. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.
Haan, J. ve Sturm, J. E. (2000). On the relationship between economic
freedom and economic growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 16 (2):
215-241.
Haldane, A. G. ve Hall, S. G. (1991). Sterling’s relationship with the dollar
and the deutschmark: 1976-89. The Economic Journal, 101 (406): 436-443.
Henry, P. B. (2003). Capital-account liberalization, the cost of capital, and
economic growth. The American Economic Review, 93 (2): 91-96.
Heritage Foundation (2012). http://www.heritage.org/index/book/chapter_1
(28.05.2012).
Johnson, B. T. (1999). Comparing economic freedom and political
freedom. B. T. Johnson, K. R. Homes ve M. Kirkpatrick (Der.). 1999 index of
economic freedom: İçinde 29-34. Washington: The Heritage Foundation and Dow
Jones Company.
Jones, C. (1998). Introduction to economic growth. New York: W. W.
Norton & Company Inc.
Kennedy, P. (2006). Ekonometri kılavuzu. (Çev.: M. Sarımeşeli ve Ş.
Açıkgöz). 5. Baskı. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
Kıran, B., Yavuz, N. Ç. ve Güriş, B. (2009). Financial development and
economic growth: A panel data analysis of emerging countries. International
Research Journal of Finance and Economics, (30): 87-94.
Luintel, K. B. ve Khan, M. (1999). A quantative reassessment of the
finance-growth nexus: Evidence from a multivariate var. Journal of Development
Economics, 60 (2): 381-405.MacKinnon, J. (1991). Critical values for cointegration tests. R.F. Engle ve
C.W.J. Granger (Der.). Long-run economic relationship: readings in cointegration:
İçinde 267-276. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nelson, M. A. ve Singh, R. D. (1998). Democracy, economic freedom,
fiscal policy and growth in LDCs: a fresh look. Economic Development and
Cultural Change, 46 (4): 677-696.
Nieswiadomy, M. L. ve Strazicich, M. C. (2004). Are political freedoms
converging?. Economic Inquiry, 42 (2): 323-340.
Orend, B. (2006). Justifying socioeconomic right. R. E. H. Hessman ve C.
E. Welch (Der.). Economic rights in Canada and the United States: İçinde 25-40.
USA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Patry, W. (2009). Moral panics and the copyright wars. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Rabushka, A. (1991). Philosophical aspects of economic freedom. W.
Block ve J. C. W. Ahiakpor (Der.). Economic freedom: toward a theory of
measurement: İçinde 23-56. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). The theory of economic development. USA:
Harvard University Press.
Schwartz, H. (1992). Economic and social rights. American University
Journal of International Law and Policy, 8 (2-3): 551-566.
Scully, G. W. (1988). The institutional framework and economic
development. Journal of Political Economy, 96 (3): 652-662.
Serletis, A. ve King, M. (1977). Common stochastic trends and
convergence of European Union stock markets. The Manchester School of
Economic & Social Studies, 65 (1): 47-57.
Siegen, B. H. (1992). Constitutional protection of property and economic
rights. San Diego Law Review, 29 (2): 161-174.
Srinivasan, T. N. (1999). Trade orientation, trade liberalization and
economic growth. G. Saxonhouse ve T. N. Srinivasan (Der.). Development duality
and the international economic regime: Essays in honor of Gustav Ranis: İçinde
155-196. USA: The University of Michigan Press.
Uysal, D. (2004). Türkiye’de piyasa ekonomisi ve ekonomik özgürlükler.
Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi.
Xu, Z. ve Li, H. (2008). Political freedom, economic freedom and income
convergence: Do stages of development matter?. Public Choice, 135 (3-4): 183-
205.Yamak, N. ve Küçükkale, Y. (1997). Türkiye’de kamu harcamalarının
ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi. İktisat, İşletme ve Finans, 12 (131): 5-14.
Yılmaz, Ö. ve Kaya, V. (2006). Finansal kalkınma ve iktisadi büyüme
arasındaki nedensellik. İktisat, İşletme ve Finans, 21 (244): 120-131.
Yılmaz, Ö. ve Akıncı, M. (2012). İktisadi büyüme ve makroekonomik
belirleyicileri. Ankara: Nobel Akademi Yayınları.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com