Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

GÜVEN TİMLERİ VE PUAN SİSTEMİ: İSTANBUL ÖRNEĞİ

TRUST TEAMS AND PERSONNEL PROMOTION SYSTEM: ISTANBUL POLICE DEPARTMENT AS A CASE STUDY

Journal Name:

  • Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study explores the Trust Teams (TT) initiation of Istanbul Police Department in depth. Additionally, the Personnel Promotion System specifically tailored for the TT is also examined accordingly. This research utilized the data gathered from the interview results, benefited from media sources and documentation about this policing initiative. To investigate the TT system, Bureau of Justice Statics’ (United States) Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Survey (LEMAS) was used as a guide source. This study showed that this undercover street crimes unit helps police personnel detect crime at first hand and response to crime scene accordingly and rapidly. This research demonstrates that a plenty of policing tactics can be learned from the experiences of TT. This study proposed that TT initiation should be institutionalized, should have a strong crime analysis unit and should form a citizen complaints and personnel performance review board, found a training unit which focuses on simulation-based training objectives. In this way, TT system could be a universal body of police department that could offer exemplary crime fighting exercises.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada İstanbul Emniyet Müdürlüğü’nün Güven Timleri (GT) girişimi derinlemesine incelenmiştir. Bununla birlikte, Güven Timleri için özel olarak tasarlanmış olan Personel Promosyon Sistemine de yer verilmiştir. Bu araştırmada mülakat sonuçlarından elde edilen veriler ile medya kaynakları ve bu polislik uygulamasıyla ilgili dokümantasyondan faydalanılmıştır. Güven Timleri uygulamasının derinlemesine incelenebilmesi için, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri (ABD), Adalet İstatistikleri Bürosu’nca hazırlanan Kolluk Güçleri İşletim ve Yönetim Anketi soruları bir kılavuz kaynak olarak kullanılmıştır. Bu araştırma göstermiştir ki bu sivil giyimli gizli polislik uygulamasıyla polisler suçu ilk elden farketmekte ve bu sayede olay yerine usulünce ve hızlı bir şekilde müdahalede bulunabilmektedirler. Bu çalışmanın sonuçları, GT tecrübelerinden faydalanılarak birçok polislik taktiklerinin öğrenilebileceğini de ortaya koymaktadır. Bu incelemenin sonuçlarına göre GT girişiminin kurumsallaşması gerektiği, bu süreçte güçlü bir suç analizi birimine, vatandaş şikâyetleri ile personel promosyon sistemini değerlendirecek ayrı bir kontrol-değerlendirme mekanizmasına ve simülasyon tabanlı eğitim hedeflerini ön plana çıkaracak donanımlı bir eğitim birimine ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. GT ancak bu şekilde suçla mücadelede sıra dışı / örnek deneyimler sunabilen kolluk teşkilatlarının evrensel birer parçası olabilir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-guven-timleri-puan-sistemi-istanbul-ornegi.pdf
  • 19
55
74
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Amendola, K. L., Weisburd, D., Hamilton, E. E., Jones, G., Slipka, M. (2011). “An Experimental Study
of Compressed Work Schedules in Policing: Advantages And Disadvantages of Various
Shift Lengths”, Journal of Experimental Criminology , Vol.7, No.4, pp.407-442.
Asayiş Şube Müdürlüğü. (2012). Polisin Asayiş Suçlarıyla Mücadele Stratejisinin Geliştirilmesi ve
Güçlendirilmesi Projesi, İstanbul.
Boba, R. (2005). Guidelines to İmplement and Evaluate Crime Analysis and Mapping in Law
Enforcement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented
Policing Services.
Boba, R. (2008). Crime Analysis with Crime Mapping. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,
Bayley, D. H. (1994). “International Differences in Community Policing”, The Challenge of
Community Policing, (Ed: D. P. Rosenbaum), Thousands Oak CA: Sage, pp.278-281.
Cordner, G. W. (1997). “Community Policing: Elements and Effects”, Community Policing:
Contemporary Readings, (Ed: G. P. Alpert and A. Piquero), Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland
Press, pp.451-468.
Dahl, R., Lindblom, C. (1953). Politics, Economics and Welfare. New York: Harper.
Dolu, O. (2010), Suç Teorileri (2.Baskı), Ankara: Seçkin.
Eck, John. (2002). Crossing the Borders of Crime: Factors Influencing the Utility and
Practicality of Interjurisdictional Crime Mapping, Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
Egm.gov.tr, (2013), egm.gov.tr, (12.03.2012).
Emniyet Genel Müdürlüğü Stratejik Plan 2009-2013.
Emniyet Genel Müdürlüğü. (2010). Emniyet Genel Müdürlüğü 2010 Yılı Faaliyet Raporu.
Engel, Robin Shepard and Worden, Robert E., (2003), “Police Officers Attitudes Behavior and
Supervisory Influences: An Analysis of Problem Solving”, Criminology, V.41, N.1,
pp.131-166.
Eterno, J. A., Eli, B. S. (2005). “The New York City Police Department’s Compstat: Dream or
Nightmare?”, International Journal of Police Science & Management, Vol. 8, No.3,
pp.218-231.
euro.zaman.com.tr, (2013), http://euro.zaman.com.tr/euro/newsDetail_getNewsById.
action?newsId=12642. (02.09.2013).
Felson, M., Clarke, R. V. (1998). Opportunity Makes the Thief: Practical Theory for Crime
Prevention, Home Office: Research Development Statistics.
Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices, New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-Oriented Policing, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Grassie, R. P., Waymire, R. V., Burrows, J. W., Anderson, C. L. R., Wallace, W. D. (1977). Integrated
Criminal Apprehension Program - Crime Analysis - Executive Manual, Washington
DC: U.S. Department of Justice-Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
Guest, G.; Bunce, A., Johnson, L. (2006). “How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with
Data Saturation and Variability”, Field Methods, Vol.18, No.1, pp.59-82.
Hurriyet.com.tr, (2013), http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/12271769.asp. (02.09.2013).
Kenwitz, J. W. (1987). Cartography in France: 1660-1848, Chicago Il: University of Chicago Press.
Kelling, G. L., Michael, H. M. (1989). The Evolving Strategy of Policing, Perspectives on Policing,
Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
medyafaresi.com, (2013), http://www.medyafaresi.com/haber/55313/yasam-istanbulda-capkinmucizesi-
simitci-garson-hepsi-de-polis.html. (02.09.2013).
Moore, M. (1992). “Problem-Solving and Community Policing”, Crime and Justice, Vol.15,
pp.99-158.
Neale, P.; Thapa, S., Boyce, C. (2006). Preparing A Case Study: A Guide for Designing and Onducting
a Case Study forEvaluation Input, http://www.pathfind.org/site/DocServer/m_e_tool_
series_case_study.pdf. (27.04.2012).
Ratcliffe, J. H. (2008). Intelligence-Led Policing, Portland OR: Willan Publishing.
KAYNAKÇA
İ. Çelik - H. B. Kara
74 Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, Number 19, 2014
Sherman, L.; Gartin, P., Buerger, M. (1989). “Hot Spots of Predatory Crime: Routine Activities and
the Criminology of Place”, Criminology, Vol.27, pp.27-55.
Skogan, W. G., Susan M. H., DuBois, J., Comey, J. T., Kaiser M., Lovig, J. H. (2000). Problem Solving
in Practice: İmplementing Community Policing in Chicago, Washington DC: National
Institute of Justice.
Weisburd, D., Tom M. (1998). “Intorduction: Crime Mapping and Crime Prevention”, Crime
Mapping and Crime Prevention, (Ed: David Weisburd and Tom McEven), Monsey NY:
Criminal Justice Press, pp.1-23.
Welsh, B. C. (2006). “Evidence Based Policing for Crime Prevention”, Police Innovations:
Contrasting Perspectives, (Ed: David Weisburd and Anthony Braga), New York:
Cambridge University Press, pp.305-321.
Wilson, J. Q., George L. K. (1982). “The Police and Neighborhood Safety: Broken Windows”, Atlantic
Monthly, Vol.249, No.3, pp.29–38.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com