Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

EDUCATIONAL SIMULATION IN PRACTICE: A TEACHING EXPERIENCE USING A FLIGHT SIMULATOR

Journal Name:

  • Journal of Technology and Science Education

Publication Year:

  • 2014
DOI: 
htp://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.129

Key Words:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
The use of appropriate Educatonal Simulaton systems (sofware and hardware for learning purposes) may contribute to the applicaton of the “Learning by Doing” (LbD) paradigm in classroom, thus helping the students to assimilate the theoretcal concepts of a subject and acquire certain pre-defned competencies in a more didactcal way. The main objectve of this work is to conduct a teaching experience using a fight simulaton environment so that the students of Aeronautcal Management degree can assume the role of an aircraf pilot, in order to allow the students understanding the basic processes of the air navigaton and observe how the new technologies can transform and improve these processes. This is especially helpful in classroom to teach the contents of the Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) programme, a European project that introduces a new Air Trafc Management (ATM) paradigm based on several relevant technological and procedural changes that will afect the entre air transportaton system in the short and medium term. During and afer the executon of several actvites with a fight simulator in the classroom, both the performance and satsfacton level of the students regarding the teaching experience have been assessed through four diferent assessment methods, i.e., objectve test, executon test, observaton techniques and attude-opinion survey.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-educational-simulation-practice-teaching-experience-using-flight-simulator.pdf
  • 3
181
200
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Aguado, C., & Ruiz, S. (2013). Instalación y confguración de entornos de simulación de vuelo para formación y
experimentación de nuevas tecnologías aeronáutcas. Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.
Retrieved July 16th, 2014, from: htp://ddd.uab.cat/record/112511
Airasian, J. (2001). Classroom assessment. Concepts and applicatons. Boston: McGraw Hill.
Aldrich, C. (2005). Learning by Doing. A Comprehensive Guide to Simulatons, Computer Games, and Pedagogy
in e-Learning and Other Educatonal Experiences. San Francisco: Pfeifer.
Alessi, S.M., & Trollip, S.R. (1991). Computer-based instructon: Methods and development (2nd ed.). Englewood
Clifs, NJ: Prentce Hall.
Biggs, J. (2005). Calidad del aprendizaje universitario. Madrid: Narcea
Biggs, J., & Moore, P. (1993). The process of learning. Sydney: Prentce Hall.
Boix, G., & Armisen, S. (2008). Nuevo enfoque de la práctca educatva del Programa UNIGIS Girona. Algunas
refexiones sobre las claves del cambio. Educar, 41, 41-50. Retrieved July 16th, 2014, from:
htp://educar.uab.cat/artcle/view/140/122
Bonsón, M. (2009). Desarrollo de competencias en Educación Superior. In Blanco, A (Coord.), Desarrollo y
Evaluación de Competencias en Educación Superior (pp. 17-34). Madrid: Narcea.
De Miguel, M. (2005). Modalidades de enseñanza centradas en el desarrollo de competencias. Oviedo:
Universidad de Oviedo.
EASA (2008). Certfcaton Specifcatons for Aeroplane Flight Simulaton Training Devices. European Aviaton
Safety Agency. Retrieved July 16th, 2014, from: htp://www.easa.europa.eu/system/fles/dfu/rulemaking-docs-npa-2008-NPA-
2008-22e---CS-FSTD(H).pdf
Echevarría, B. (2001). Confguración actual de la profesionalidad. Letras de Deusto, 31(91), 35-55.
EHEA (1999). The European Higher Educaton Area, Joint declaraton of the European Ministers of Educaton
Convened in Bologna on the 19th of June of 1999.
Gibbons, A.S., & Fairweather, P.G. (1998). Computer-based instructon: Design and development. Englewood
Clifs, NJ: Educatonal Technology Publicatons.
Herrington, J., & Herrington, A. (1998). Authentc Assessment and Multmedia: how university students respond
to a model of authentc assessment. Higher Educaton Research & Development, 17(3), 305-322.
htp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0729436980170304
Lasnier, F. (2000). Réussir la formaton par competence. Montreal: Guérin.
Lussier, O., & Allaire, H. (2004). L’évaluaton “authentque”. Pédagogie collégiale, 17(3), 29-30.
Martnez, J., & Belda, R. (2000). Navegación, sistemas y equipos, maniobras y procedimientos (6th Editon).
Burgos: Amábar, S.L.
Martnez, J. (2003). Algunas falacias sobre el aprendizaje. Página Digital. Retrieved July 16th, 2014, from:
htp://www.paginadigital.com.ar/artculos/2003/2003sept/notcias6/26530-9.asp
McDonald, R., Boud, D., Francis, J., & Ginczi, A. (2000). Nuevas perspectvas sobre la evaluación. Boletn
Cintefor, 149, 41-72.
Newbold, P. (2001). Statstcs for Business and Economics (6th Editon). Madrid: Prentce Hall.
Sánchez, J. (2012). Especial Simulación Aeronáutca 2012. Avión Revue Internacional, Pp. 41-63.
SESAR Consortum (2007). The ATM target concept. SESAR defniton phase, deliverable 3.
Shannon, R., & Johannes, J.D. (1976). Systems simulaton: the art and science. IEEE Transactons on Systems,
Man and Cybernetcs, 9, 723-724. htp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1976.4309432
Tardif, J. (2006). L’Evaluaton de compétences. Documenter le parcours de développement. Montréal:
Chenelière Éducaton.
Valverde, J. (2010). Aprendizaje de la Historia y Simulación Educatva. Revista Tejuelo: Didáctca de la Lengua y
Literatura. Educación, 9(Year III), 83-99. Retrieved July 16th, 2014, from:
htp://iesgtballester.juntaextremadura.net/web/profesores/tejuelo/vinculos/artculos/r09/n9completo.pdf
Yániz, C., & Villardón, L. (2006). Planifcar desde competencias para promover el aprendizaje. Bilbao:
Universidad de Deusto.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com