Buradasınız

Student's perception about integrated teaching in an undergraduate medical curriculum

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Integrated curriculum in medical teaching learning to become a physician is different from research. Medical students need to fit things together as well as tease things apart. They need to learn the relationship between the parts, how to synthesize, how to see the big picture. Integration of the curriculum promotes a holistic and cross discipline approach to patients and their problems. It can also help promote learning in context. This encourages a more holistic view of a patient’s problems; increased motivation levels among students; better educational effectiveness of teaching because learnt material is applied; more emphasis on higher learning objectives, such as application of knowledge and problem solving skills; and promotion of staff communication and collaboration, with a more efficient use of teaching resources. There are some disadvantages with this method being the fundamentals of a discipline may be neglected; some topics may be omitted; teachers may be less enthusiastic and less comfortable when not teaching in their own discipline; discipline based teaching may be cheaper; and students may develop a clearer picture of a discipline as a career in the discipline based method. In the present study 95.6% of students felt that integrated teaching is advantageous mainly horizontal over vertical, with negative perception in 35.4% of students. They felt that it is time consuming, cuts down the time of self study and lengthy.
47
52

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Joglekar S, Bhuryan PS, Kishore S. Integrated teaching – Our experience. J Postgrad Med 1994; 40:231-2.
2. Ghosh S, Pandya HV. Implementation of an integrated learning program in neuroscience during the first
year of the traditional medical course; Perception of the students and faculty. BMC Medical education
2008; 8:44.
3. Jennifer K, Brueckner, Gould DJ. The health science faculty member’s perceptions on curricular
integration: Insight and obstacles. The Journal of the International Association of Medical Science
Educators 2006; 16: 31-4.
4. Vyas R, Jacob M, Faith M, Isacc B, Rabi S, Satish Kumar S , Selvakumar D, Ganesh.A. An effective,
integrated learning programme in the first year of the medical course. The National Medical Journal of
India. 2008; 21:1-6.
5. Vidic B, Weitlauf HM. The horizontal and vertical integration of academic disciplines in the medical
school curriculum. Clin Anat 15:233-5
51
Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; March 2015: Vol.-4, Issue- 2, P. 47-52
48
www.ijbamr.com P ISSN: 2250-284X , E ISSN : 2250-2858
6. Muller J H, Jain.S, Loeser H, Irby D.M. Lessons which have to be learned about integrating a medical
school curriculum and the perceptions of the students, the faculty and the curriculum leaders. Med. Educ
2008;42: 778-85
7. Soudarssanane MB, Sahai A. Innovative integrated teaching of epidemiology Indian Journal of Community
Medicine.2007; 32:1- 10) Schmidt H. Integrating the teaching of basic sciences, clinical sciences and
biopsychosocial issues .Chapter 4. Academic Medicine 73: S-24- 31
8. Kingsley K, Malley S O, Stewart T, Howard M K. Research Enrichment: evaluation of the structured
research in the curriculum for dental medicine students as a part of the vertical and horizontal integration of
biomedical teaching and discovery.BMC Med Edu 2008;8:91472- 6920
9. Kalpana Kumari M.K., Vijaya V., Mysorekar Seema Raja. Student's perception about integrated teaching in
an undergraduate medical curriculum. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2011; 5:1256-1259.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com