Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Correlation of body height with thoracic and lumbar vertebral parameters

Journal Name:

  • Indian Journal of Basic & Applied Medical Research

Publication Year:

  • 2014
Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
With increasing popularity, there has been dramatic improvement in the way the spinal fusion operations are performed as well as in the fixation devices including the pedicle screws. Success among other factors depends on the accuracy of choice of screw, size of the pedicle and quality of the bone.1 With the recent increased use of various pedicle screw instrumentations, there is concern about injuries to the pedicle cortex, nerve root, facet joint, and adjacent vital structures by discordant pedicle screw size. Fracture of the pedicle may result from the use of relatively oversized screw. It was also observed that larger screw diameters were stronger and gave better results; therefore choice of the screw for the operation is determined by the minimum diameter of the pedicle.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-correlation-body-height-thoracic-and-lumbar-vertebral-parameters.pdf
  • 1
144
153
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Aruna N, Rajeshwari T M S. A Study of Lumbar Pedicle size in South Indians. Anatomica
Karnataka.2011; 5(2):69-73.
2. Zindrick M R, Wiltse L L, Widell E H, Thomas J C, Holland W R, Fields B T. A
biomechanical study of interpedicular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop.
1986 Feb; 203:99-112.
3. Zerui Z, Yuchun C, Hui H, Shijian C, Xinjia W, Weili Q, Kangmei K.Thoracic Pedicle
Morphometry in Different Body Height Population: A Three-Dimensional Study Using
Reformatted Computed Tomography. Spine.2011November; 36(24):1547–1554.
4. Weinstein J N, Rydevic B L, Rauschning W. Anatomic and technical considerations of
pedicle screw fixation. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research.1992; 284: 34-6.
Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; December 2014: Vol.-4, Issue- 1, P. 144-153
145
www.ijbamr.com P ISSN: 2250-284X , E ISSN : 2250-2858
5. Krag M F L, Weaver D L, Beynnon B D, Haugh L D. Morphometry of thoracic and lumbar
spine related to transpedicular screw placement for surgical spinal fixation. Spine. 1988;
13:27-32.
6. Mclain R F, Ferrara L, Kabins M. Pedicle morphometry in the upper thoracic spine: Limits to
safe screw placement in older patients. Spine. 2002; 27:2467-71.
7. Romanes G J. Cunninghams manual of practical anatomy, vol. 2. 15th ed. New York: Oxford
University Press, 1996. p. 3-82.
8. Datir S P, Mitra S R. Morphometric study of the thoracic vertebral pedicle in an Indian
population. Spine. 2004; 29:1174-81.
9. Chadha M, Balain B, Maini L, Dhaon B K. Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic, lumbar,
and S1 vertebrae: an Indian perspective. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:744–749.
10. Acharya S, Dorje T, Srivastava A. Lower dorsal and lumbar pedicle morphometry in Indian
population: a study of four hundred fifty vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010
May;35(10):378-84.
11. Singh R, Srivastva S K, Chittode S, Vishnu P,Rajesh K R, Ramchander S, Narender K M.
Morphometric Measurements of Cadaveric Thoracic Spine in Indian Population and Its
Clinical Applications. Asian Spine Journal.2011; 5(1):20-34.
12. Kim N H, Lee H M, Chung I H, Kim H J, Kim S J. Morphometric study of the pedicles of
thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in Koreans. Spine 1994; 19(12): 1390-4.
13. Kim Y J, Lenke L G, Bridwell K H, Cho Y S, Riew K D. Free hand pedicle screw placement
in the thoracic spine: Is it safe? Spine 2004; 29:333-42.
14. Vinay KV, Beena D N and Vishal K. Lumbar pedicle morphometry in south indians using cr-
35x digitizer. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences. 2012; 2 (2) April-
June:173 -178.
15. Ajay S C, Nilesh B G, Yuvraj R, Bharath L, Amit B J, Shashikant N N. Morphometric study
of lumber pedicles in indian population. J. f Orthopedics.2009; 6(4):9.
16. Balaji S P, Gangadhara, Nirmala S, Muralimohan S, Varsha S M. Morphometric analysis of
the thoracic pedicle: An anatomico – radiological study. Neurology India. 2010; 58(2): 122-
136.
17. Mirza B, Sejla B, Farid L, Barbara U R S, Eldan K, Mehmet T, Dragica S. Morphometry of
Thoracic and Lumbal Vertebras. Coll. Antropol.2012; 36 (4): 1313–1317.
18. Prakash, Latha V P, Rajanigandha V, Mángala M P, Anu V R, Gajendra Singh. Morphometry
of Vertebral Pedicles: a Comprehensive Anatomical Study in the Lumbar Region. Int J.
MorphoL.2007; 25(2):393-406.
19. Kim J H, Gyeong-Mi C, In-Bok C, Sung-Ki A, Joon-Ho S, Hyun-Chul C. Pedicular and
Extrapedicular Morphometric Analysis in the Korean Population : Computed Tomographic
Assessment Relevance to Pedicle and Extrapedicle Screw Fixation in the Thoracic Spine. J
Korean Neurosurg Soc.2009; 46 :181-188.
150
Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; December 2014: Vol.-4, Issue- 1, P. 144-153
146
www.ijbamr.com P ISSN: 2250-284X , E ISSN : 2250-2858
20. Liau K M, Yusof M I, Abdullah M S, Abdullah S, Yusof A H. Computed tomographic
morphometry of thoracic pedicles: safety margin of transpedicular screw fixation in malaysian
malay population. Spine. 2006 Jul; 31(16):545-50.
21. Tan S H, Teo E C, Chua H C. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of cervical, thoracic
and lumbar vertebrae of Chinese Singaporeans. Eur Spine J.2004; 13:137–146.
22. Salimzadeh A, Moghaddassi M, Alishiri G H, Owlia M B, Kohan L. Vertebral morphometry
reference data by X-ray absorptiometry (MXA) in Iranian women. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;
26:704–709.
23. Kunkel M E, Schmidt H,Wilke H J. Prediction equations for human thoracic and
lumbarvertebral morphometry. J. Anat. 2010; 216:320–328.
24. Gocmen-mas N, Karabekir H, Ertekin T, Edizer M, Canan Y, Izzet D I. Evaluation of lumbar
vertebral body and disc: a stereological morphometric study. Int. J. Morphol.2010; 28(3):841-
847.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com