1. Byun, D.H.,“The AHP Approach for Selecting an
Automobile Purchase Model”, Information &
Management, 38, 289-297, 2001.
2. Dağdeviren, M., Eraslan, E., Kurt, M. ve Dizdar,
E., “Tedarikçi Seçimi Problemine Analitik Ağ
Süreci İle Alternatif Bir Yaklaşım” Teknoloji,
Cilt 8, Sayı 2, 115-122, 2005.
3. Soner, S. ve Önüt, S., “Multi-Criteria Supplier
Selection: An ELECTRE-AHP Application”,
Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi,
Cilt:4, s.110-120, 2006.
4. Yousefi, A ve Vencheh, A. H., “An Integrated
Group Decision Making Model and its Evaluation
By DEA for Automobile Industry”, Expert
Systems with Applications, 37, 8543–8556,
2010.
5. Bozdemir, Y. ve Yılmaz, İ. T., “Kural Tabanlı
Karar Verme Mekanizmasına Sahip Sistematik
Araç Seçim Modeli Geliştirilmesi”, Makine
Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi Cilt: 6, No: 2,
19-27, 2009.
6. Terzi, Ü., Hacaloğlu, S. E. ve Aladağ, Z.,
“Otomobil Satın Alma Problemi İçin Bir Karar
Destek Modeli”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi
Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Yıl: 5 Sayı:10, s. 43-49,
2006.
7. Güngör, İ. ve İşler, D.B., “Analitik Hiyerarşi
Yaklaşımı İle Otomobil Seçimi” ZKÜ Sosyal
Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt 1, Sayı 2, s. 21-33, 2005.
8. Vrkljan, B. H. ve Anaby, D., “What Vehicle
Features are Considered Important When Buying
an Automobile? An Examination Of Driver
Preferences By Age And Gender”, Journal of
Safety Research, 42, 61–65, 2011.
9. Ballı, S., Karasulu, B. ve Korukoğlu, S., “En
Uygun Otomobil Seçimi Problemi İçin Bir
Bulanık Promethee Yöntemi Uygulaması”,
D.E.Ü.İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, Cilt:22 Sayı:1, s,139-147,
2007.
10. Yi, H. C., Chen, K.T. ve Tzeng, G.H., “FMCDM
with Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach for Customers’
Choice Behavior Model”, International Journal
of Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 9, No. 4, December 2007.
11. Shyur, H.J. ve Shih, H.S., "A Hybrid MCDM
Model for Strategic Vendor Selection",
Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 44, 8,
749-761, 2006.
12. Dağdeviren, M., Dönmez N. ve Kurt, M.,
“Developing A New Model For Supplier
Evaluation Process For A Company And Its
Application”, J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ.,
Vol.21, No.2, 247-255, 2006.
13. Tuzkaya, U.R. ve Önüt, S., “A Fuzzy Analytic
Network Process Based Approach to
Transportation-Mode Selection Between Turkey
and Germany: A Case Study” Information
Sciences, 178, 3133–3146, 2008.
14. Chen, H.H., Lee, H.I. ve Kang, H.Y., “A Model
for Strategic Selection of Feeder Management
Systems: A Case Study”, Electrical Power and
Energy Systems , 32, 421–427, 2010.
15. Köne, A.Ç. ve Büke, T., “An Analytical Network
Process (ANP) Evaluation of Alternative Fuels for
Electricity Generation in Turkey”, Energy Policy,
35, 5220–5228, 2007.
16. Çelebi, D., Bayraktar, D. ve Bingöl, L.,
“Analytical Network Process for Logistics
Management: A Case Study in a Small Electronic
Appliances Manufacturer”, Computers &
Industrial Engineering, 58, 432–441, 2010.
Lojistik Sektöründe Ağır Ticari Araç Seçimi Problemine Çok Ölçütlü Bir Yaklaşım M. Kabak, Ö. O. Uyar
Gazi Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Der. Cilt 28, No 1, 2013 125
17. Güneri, A.F., Cengiz, M. ve Şeker, S., “A Fuzzy
ANP Approach to Shipyard Location Selection”,
Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 7992–
7999, 2009.
18. Tuzkaya, G., Gülsün, B., Kahraman, C. ve Özgen,
B., “Integrated Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision
Making Methodology for Material Handling
Equipment Selection Problem and an
Application”, Expert Systems with Applications,
37, 2853–2863, 2010.
19. Bulut, K. ve Soylu, B., “Öğretim Üyelerinin İş
Yükü Seviyelerinin Bir Analitik Ağ Modeli İle
Değerlendirilmesi: Mühendislik Fakültesinde Bir
Uygulama”, Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri
Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25 (1-2), 150 – 167, 2009.
20. Gümüş, A.T., Çetin, A. ve Kaplan, E., “A Fuzzy-
Analytic Network Process Based Approach for
Enterprise Information System Selection”,
Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences
Sigma, 28, 74-85, 2010.
21. Lin, H.T., “Personel Selection Using Analytic
Network Process and Fuzzy Data Envelopment
Analysis Approaches”, Computers & Industrial
Engineering, 59, 937–944, 2010.
22. Gümüş, A.T. ve Yılmaz, G. “Sea Vessel Type
Selection via an Integrated VAHP–ANP
Methodology For High-Speed Public
Transportation in Bosphorus”, Expert Systems
with Applications, 37, 4182–4189, 2010.
23. Halouani, N., Chabchoub, H. ve Martel, J.M.,
“PROMETHEE-MD-2T Method for Project
Selection”, European Journal of Operational
Research, 195(3), 841–895, 2009.
24. Fernández-Castro, A.S., ve Jiménez, M.,
“PROMETHEE: An Extension through Fuzzy
Mathematical Programming”, Journal of the
Operational Research Society, 56, 119–122,
2005.
25. Dulmin, R. ve Mininno, V., “Supplier Selection
Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Aid Method”,
Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management,
9, 177–187, 2003.
26. Wang, J.J., Wei, C.M. ve Yang, D., “Decision
Method for Vendor Selection Based on
AHP/PROMETHEE/GAIA”. Journal of Dalian
University of Technology, 46 (6), 926–931, 2006.
27. Radojevic, D. ve Petrovic, S., “A Fuzzy Approach
to Preference Structure in Multicriteria Ranking”,
International Transaction in Operation
Research, 4 (5/6), 419–430, 1997.
28. Madlener, R., Kowalski, K. ve Stagl, S., “New
Ways for the Integrated Appraisal Of National
Energy Scenarios: The Case of Renewable Energy
Use in Austria”, Energy Policy, 35, 6060–6074,
2007.
29. Roux, O., Duvivier, D., Dhaevers, V., Meskens,
N. ve Artiba, A., “Multicriteria Approach to Rank
Scheduling Strategies”, International Journal of
Production Economics, 112 (11), 192–201, 2008.
30. Dağdeviren, M., “Decision Making in Equipment
Selection: An Integrated Approach with AHP and
PROMETHEE”, Journal of Intelligent
Manufacturing, 19, 397-406, 2008.
31. Bouri, A., ve Martel, J.M., “A Multi-Criterion
Approach for Selecting Attractive Portfolio”,
Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 11,
269–277, 2002.
32. Anand, G. ve Kodali, R. “Selection Of Lean
Manufacturing Systems Using the
PROMETHEE”, Journal of Modelling in
Management, 3 (1), 40–70, 2008.
33. Saaty, T.L., Decision Making with Dependence
and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process,
Pittsburgh, RWS Publications, 1996.
34. Jharkharia, S. ve Shankar, R., “Selection of
Logistics Service Provider: An Analytic Network
Process (ANP) Approach”, Omega, 35, 274 –
289, 2007.
35. Brans, J.P., “Lingenierie de la decision.
Elaboration dinstruments daide a la decision:
Methode PROMETHEE”, Presses de Universite
Laval, Quebec, Canada, 183–214, 1982.
36. Vincke, J.P. ve Brans, J.P., “A Preference Ranking
Organization Method. The PROMETHEE Method
for MCDM”, Management Science, 31, 641–
656, 1985.
37. Brans, J.P., Vincke, Ph. ve Mareschal, B., “How
to Select and How to Rank Projects: The
PROMETHEE Method”, European Journal of
Operational Research, 24 (2), 228–238, 1986.
38. Goumas, M., ve Lygerou, V., “An Extension of
the PROMETHEE Method for Decision Making
in Fuzzy Environment: Ranking of Alternative
Energy Exploitation Projects”, European Journal
of Operational Research, 123, 606-613, 2000.
39. Le Teno, J., F., ve Mareschal, B., “An Interval
Version of PROMETHEE For the Comparison of
Building Products’ Design with Ill-Defined Data
on Environmental Quality”, Europal Journal of
Operational Research, 109, 522–529, 1998.
40. Dağdeviren, M. ve Eraslan, E., “Supplier
Selection Using PROMETHEE Sequencing
Method”, J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ., Vol.
23, No.1, 69-75, 2008.
41. Brans, J.P., ve Mareschal, B., “PROMETHEE V –
MCDM Problems with Segmentation
Constraints”, INFOR, 30 (2), 85–96, 1992.
42. Mareschal, B. ve Brans, J.E., "Geometrical
Representations for MCDM" (GAIA), EJOR,
Vol. 34, 69-77, 1988.
43. Mareschal, B., “What is the Delta Value in
GAIA?”. http://www.prometheegaia.
net/faqpro/index.php?action=article&cat_
id=003& id =17&lang.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
