Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Karadeniz Ekonomik İşbirliği (KEİ) Bölgesinde Ticaret Akımlarını Belirleyen Faktörler: Panel Çekim Modeli

Karadeniz Ekonomik İşbirliği (KEİ) Bölgesinde Ticaret Akımlarını Belirleyen Faktörler: Panel Çekim Modeli

Journal Name:

  • Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
After the receding of the atmosphere of the cold war, suspicion and mistrust, the countries of Black Sea area have been able to undertake bold steps to be tightened the relationships among themselves. They come together and decided to how, in the age of globalisation of economies, valuable assets in their possession, such as geographical proximity, common history, cultural bonds and interdependence of their national economies could be efficiently employed for mutual benefit and prosperity. Foundation of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC) bases on this intention. In this paper impacts of the gravitational factors on bilateral trade are investigated in case of BSEC region. The estimations of the panel gravity models reveal that economic size and population of the importer countries have a positive impact on trade volume, whereas the distance between them works on the opposite way.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Soğuk Savaş, kuşku ve güvensizlik ortamının sona ermesinin ardından Karadeniz’e komşu ülkeler aralarındaki ilişkileri sıkılaştırmak için cesur adımlar atma fırsatı bulmuşlardır. Ülkeler bir araya gelerek, ekonomilerin küreselleştiği çağda, coğrafi yakınlık, ortak tarih, kültürel bağlar ve millî ekonomiler arasındaki bağımlılık gibi sahip oldukları değerli varlıkların karşılıklı kazanç ve refah için etkin bir şekilde kullanılmasına karar vermişlerdir. Karadeniz Ekonomik İşbirliği (KEİ) nin kuruluşu bu niyete dayanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, KEİ örneğinde çekimsel faktörlerin ikili ticaret üzerindeki etkileri ele alınmaktadır. Panel çekim modeli tahminleri, ithalatçı ülkenin ekonomik ve nüfus büyüklüğünün ticaret hacmini olumlu, aradaki uzaklığın ise olumsuz etkilediğini göstermektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-karadeniz-ekonomik-isbirligi-kei-bolgesinde-ticaret-akimlarini-belirleyen-faktorler-panel-cekim-modeli.pdf
  • 1
63
75
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Anderson, J.E. (1979), “A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation”,
American
Economic Review, (93) 1, pp. 170-192
Antonucci, D. and S. Manzocchi (2005), “Does Turkey have a Special Trade
Relation with the
EU? A Gravity Model Approach”,
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract id=609881
Armstrong, S. (2007), Measuring Trade and Trade Potential: A Survey, Asia
Pacific Economic
Papers, No. 368, Australia-Japan Research Centre, pp. 18
Baier, S.L. and J.H. Bergstrand (2005), Do Free Trade Agreements Actually
Increase Members’
International Trade?, Working Paper No. 2005-3, Federal Reserve Bank of
Atlanta
Batra, A. (2004), India’s Trade Potential: The Gravity Model Approach, Working
Paper No.
151, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, pp.
38
Bergstrand, J.H. (1985), “The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some
Microeconomic
Foundations and Empirical Evidence”, Review of Economics and Statistics,
(67) 3, pp. 474-481
74
Bikker, J.A. (1987), “An International Trade Flow Model with Substitution: An
Extension of
Gravity Model”, Kyklos, (40), pp. 315-337
Bos, J.W.B. ve M. van de Laar, (2004) Explaining Foreign Direct Investment in
Central and
Eastern Europe: An Extended Gravity Approach, DNB Working Papers, 008,
Netherlands Central Bank.
Breuss, F. and P. Egger (1999), “How Reliable are Estimations of East-West Trade
Potentials
Based on Cross-section Gravity Analyses?”, Empirica, 26 (2), pp. 81-95.
Bussiére, M. and B. Schnatz (2006), Evaluating China’s Integration in World
Trade with a
Gravity Model Based Benchmark, W. P. No. 693, European Central Bank,
pp. 40
Deardorff, A.V. (1995), Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a
Neo-classic
World?, NBER Working Paper No. 5377, pp. 28
Dikkaya, M. and M. Orhan (2003), “Economies of the Black Sea Economic
Cooperation
(BSEC) Countries and their Bilateral Trade”, Journal of Economic and
Social Research, (6) 2, pp. 63-86.
Egger, P. (2000), “A Note on the Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity
Equation”,
Economics Letters, 66, pp. 25-31.
Egger, P. (2005), “Alternative Techniques for Estimation of Cross-Section Gravity
Models”,
Review of International Economics, (13) 5, pp. 881-891.
Hellvin, L. and L. Nilsson (2000), Trade Flows Between Trading Blocs: The Case
of the EU’s
Trade with Asia and NAFTA, Swedish Network for European Studies in
Economics and Business, Discussion Paper,
http://www.snee.org/filer/papers/36.pdf
Jayasinghe, S. and R. Sarker (2004), Effects of Regional Trade Agreements on
Trade in
Agrifood Products: Evidence from Gravity Modeling Using Disaggregated
Data, Working Paper No. 374, Center for Agricultural and Rural
Development, Iowa State University, pp. 37
Kien, N.T. and Y. Hashimoto (2005), Economic Analysis of ASEAN Free Trade
Area By
Country Panel Data, Discussion Paper No. 05-12, Osaka School of
International Public Policy, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan, pp. 20
75
Martinez-Zarzoso, I. (2003), “Gravity Model: An Application to Trade Between
Regional
Blocs”, Atlantic Economic Journal, 31 (2), pp. 174-187
Martinez-Zarzoso, I. and F. Nowak-Lahmann (2003), Augmented Gravity Model:
An Empirical
Application to Mercosur-European Union Trade Flows, Journal of Applied
Economics, 4 (2), pp. 291-316
Matyas, L. (1997), “Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Model”, The
World
Economy, 20 (3), pp. 363-8.
Porojan, A. (2000), Trade Flows and Spatial Effects: The Gravity Model Revisited,
University
of Derby.
Pöyhönen, P. (1963), A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade Between
Countries,
Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 90, pp. 23-40
Rojid, S. (2006), COMESA Trade Potential: A Gravity Approach, Applied
Economics Letters,
13, pp. 947-951.
Sayan, S. (1998), Could Regional Economic Cooperation Generate Trade Creation
and Trade
Diversion Effects without Altering Trade Policies of Members? Preliminary
Results from a gravity Application to BSEC, Discussion Paper No. 98-10,
Bilkent University.
Simwaka, K. (2006), Dynamics of Malawi’s Trade Flows: A Gravity Model
Approach, MPRA
Paper No. 1122, pp. 12
Tinbergen, J. (1962), An Analysis of World Trade Flows, J. Tinbergen (ed.): in
Shaping the
World Economy, New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.
Windgren, M. (2006), Trade Potential, Intra-industry Trade and Factor Content of
Revealed
Comparative Advantage in the Baltic Sea Region, Discussion Papers No.
1034, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Helsinki.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com