You are here

Home » Content

REASONS FOR STUDENTS AT THE AGE OF COMPULSORY EDUCATION TO CHOOSE OPEN EDUCATION HIGH SCHOOL

Journal Name:

  • Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World

Publication Year:

  • 2016

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In the study, it is aimed to determine the profile of students preferring open high school at an age of compulsory education and to determine the reasons to their open high school preference. Study group of the research consists of 174 students enrolled in the open high school in Burdur city center. In the research using descriptive research model, research data was collected through the student information form. In the research; descriptive analyses and chi-square test were employed. As a result of analyses, it is understood that most of these students are from low socio-economic level, they do not find the education provided in open high school sufficient and they consider enrolling back to formal education. Among causes for students to enroll to open high school, there are low success, dislike in school and lessons, failing the class for two years in a row, low family income and more comfortable preparation to the university entrance exam. It is understood that, among these causes, low family income and failing the class for two years in a row showed significant differences by gender and these were more decisive in male students’ enrollment for open high school.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-reasons-students-age-compulsory-education-choose-open-education-high-school.pdf
  • 3
10
18
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Ağın, A. (1995). The recognition research of open education high school students - Ankara Example. Ankara.
Alkan, C. (1987): Open education. Ankara: Ankara University Faculty of Education Sciences Publication. No: 157.
Alkan, C. (2005). Education technologies. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
Alkan, C. , Doğan, H. and Sezgin İ. (1998). The principles of vocational and technical education (4th. Edition).
İstanbul: Alkım.
Alkan, A., Çarkoğlu, A., Filiztekin, A. and İnceoğlu, F. (2008). Value-added formation in the Turkey secondary
education sector (4th. Edition). İstanbul: Alkım.
Arseven, A. D. (2001). Field research method. Ankara: Gündüz Education Publishing.
Çam Tosun, F. and Bayram, A. (2015). Increase in open high school: Female students. Education Science Society
Journal, 13(49), 84-99.
Demiray, U. (2002). The bibliography of studies about the Anadolu University Open Education Faculty.
Eskişehir. ISBN 98590-3-3.
Dinçer, M. A. and Uysal Kolaşin, G. (2009). Determinants of inequality on student achievement in Turkey.
İstanbul: Education Reform Initiative.
ERG. (2009). Bilingualism and education. İstanbul: Education Reform Initiative.
Eshelman, M. (1997). Enhancing educational opportunities for women through distance education. Emc 598,
Spring.
Hızal, A. (1983). Distance education process and written sources: Approach in terms of education technology.
Ankara: Ankara University Faculty of Education Sciences Publication. Number: 22.
İşman, A. (2011). Distance education. Ankara: Pegem Publication.
Johnson, S.D., Aragon, S.R., Shaik, N. & Palma-Rivas, N. (2002). Comparative analysis of online vs face to face
instruction. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED448722).
Karasar, N. (2002). Scientific research method: Concepts, principles, techniques. Ankara: 3A Research Training
Consulting.
Karataş, S. (2003). The equivalency of learning experiences in distance and face to face education. Education
Sciencies and Practies, 2(3), 91-104.
Kaya, Z. (1996). Distance education textbooks “Open high school example”. Ankara: Gazi University Faculty of
Industrial Arts Education.
Kaya, Z. (2002). Distance education. Ankara: Ankara: Pegem A Publication.
Keegan, D. (1995). Foundations of distance education. New York: Routledge Falmer.
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND INSTRUCTIONAL STUDIES
IN THE WORLD
August 2016, Volume: 6 Issue: 3 Article: 02 ISSN: 2146-7463
COPYRIGHT © JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND INSTRUCTIONAL STUDIES IN THE WORLD
18
Kör, H., Çataloğlu, E. and Erbay, H. (2013). Investigation of the effects of distance education and formal
education into student success. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 12(2), 267-279.
Mclsaac, M. S. & Köymen, S.Ü. (1990). Distance education opportunities for women in Turkey, Open Praxis-The
Bulletin of the International Council for Open Distance Education, May.
MEB. (1994). The recognition research of open education high school students. Ankara: Ministry of National
Education.
MEB. (2014-2015). National Education Statistics Formal Education 2014/15. Ministry of National Education
Strategy Development Presidency. Ankara.
Özdemir, S., Erkan, S., Karip, E., Sezgin, F. and Şirin, H. (2010). Solution proposals and school drop causes of
elementary education children. Project No: 107K453.
Powell, G.N. and Greenhaus, J.H. (2010). Sex, gender and decisions at the family - work interface. Journal of
Management. 36(4), 1011-1039.
Suğur, S. and Şavran, G.T. (2006). An examination of the open educatian system in Turkey from a gender point
of view. Ankara University SBF Journal, 61(3).
Tasçı, D. (1996). The applicability of total quality in distance education institutions. Turkey 1 th International
Distance Education Symposium. 12-15 November, 599-605.
Teker, N. (1995). Operation and structure in distance education: Open high school Example. Ankara University
Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 270.
Uluğ, F. and Kaya, Z. (1997). Primary education through distance education approach. Ankara: Distance
Education Foundation.
Verduin, J. R. & Clark, T. A. (1994). Distance education: The foundations of effective practice. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Young, A. E. (2007). A history of distance education- literature review. Journal of the University College of the
Cayman Islands, 1(1).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com