You are here

Home » Content

PERKÜTAN ENDOSKOPİK GASTROSTOMİ (PEG) DENEYİMLERİMİZ: 68 OLGU NEDENİ İLE

Journal Name:

  • Selçuk Tıp Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Background: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) become the modality of choice for providing enteral access to patients who require long-term enteral nutrition. PEG is accepted method of placing a feeding tube to enable enteral feeding in patients with swallowing difficulties. However, the factors associated with complications and death after PEG have not been studied in detail. Objective and study design: In this study, our purpose reported on 68 patients who underwent PEG placement between January 2004 and March 2008. The PEG procedure was performed on 68 patients from January 2004 to March 2008 in intensive care unit. Clinical outcomes were retrospectively collected in these patients. Results: A total of 11.76 % of the identified patients had neurologic disease, 32.35% of patients had trauma, 22.05 % of patients had postoperative respiratory failure, 8.85% of patients had other respiratory failure, 1.47 % of patients had intoxication and 23.52 % of patients had intracerebral ematoma, ischemia, tumor. In all patients, PEG tubes were placed succesfully, but several complications were observed in 13 patients (19.11 %) ( bleeding in 1 patient (1.47 %), infection in 8 patients (11.76 %), subcutaneous amphysema in 1 patient (1.47 %) and obstruction of PEG tube in 3 patients (4.41 %). After PEG tube insertion, 15 patients (22.05 %) died within two weeks. Conclusion: Mortality and morbidity rates after PEG tube insertion are not insignificant. PEG placement appears to be a safe and effective approach to enteral nutritional support in critical care patients requiring long-term access to the gastrointestinal system. Multidisciplinary team assessment should be performed all of patients being referred for PEG tubes insertion.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç ve Çalışma Yöntemi: Bu çalışmada, amacımız Ocak 2004-Mart 2008 yılları arasında PEG uygulanan 68 hastayı değerlendirmekti. Yoğun bakım ünitesinde Ocak 2004- Mart 2008 arasında 68 hastaya PEG girişimi uygulandı. Bu hastalarda klinik gidiş retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Hastaların % 11.76’sı nörolojik hastalıklar, %32.35’i travma, %22.05’i postoperatif solunum yetmezliği, %8.85’i diğer nedenlere bağlı solunum yetmezliği, %1.47’si zehirlenme, ve %23.52’si intraserebral hematom, iskemi ve tümör hastasi idi. Tüm hastalarda PEG tüpü başarı ile yerleştirildi, fakat 13 (% 19.11) hastada çeşitli komplikasyonlar (1 hastada (%1.47) kanama, 8 hastada (%11.76) enfeksiyon, 1 hastada (% 1.47) cilt altı amfizem ve 3 hastada (% 4.41) PEG tüpünde obstruksiyon) gelişti. PEG tüpü yerleştirildikten sonra 15 hasta (% 22.05) 2 hafta içinde kaybedildi. Sonuç: PEG tüpü uygulamasından sonraki mortalite ve morbidite oranları tam olarak bilinmemektedir. Uzun süreli gastrointestinal geçiş gerektiren yoğun bakım hastalarında enteral beslenme desteği sağlamak için PEG uygulaması etkili ve güvenli kabul edilmektedir. PEG tüpü yerleştirilmesi için tüm hastalar multidisipliner bir ekip tarafından değerlendirilmelidir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-perkutan-endoskopik-gastrostomi-peg-deneyimlerimiz-68-olgu-nedeni-ile.pdf
  • 1
37-42
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ Jr. Gastrostomy
without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic
technique. J Pediatr Surg 1980; 15: 872-875.
2. Ponsky JL, Gauderer MW. Percutaneous endoscopic
gastrostomy: a nonoperative technique for feding
gastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1981; 27: 9-11.
3. Schrag SP, Sharma R, Jaik NP, et al. Complications
related to percutaneous endoskopic gastrostomy
(PEG) tubes. A comprehensive clinical review. J
Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2007; 16: 407-418.
4. Hiki N, Maetani I, Suzuki Y, et al. Reduced risk of
periostomal infection of direct percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in cancer patients: comparison
with the pull percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
procedure. J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 4: 737-744.
5. Virnig DJ, Frech EJ, DeLegge MH, Fang JC. Direct
percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy: a case series in pediatric patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;
1-4.
6. Maple J, Petersen B, Baron T, et al. Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy: outcomes in
307 consecutive attempts. Am J Gastroenterol
2005;100: 2681-2688.
7. Maetani I, Yasuda M, Seike M, et al. Efficacy of an
overtube for reducing the risk of peristomal infection after PEG placement: a prospective, randomized comparison study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;
61: 522-527.
8. Suzuki Y, Urashima M, Ishibashi Y, et al. Covering
the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)
tube prevents peristomak infection. World J Surg
2006; 30: 1450-1458.
9. Rimon E. The safety and feasibility of percutaneous
endoscopic gastrostomy placement by a single physician. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 241-244.
10. Haslam N, Hughes S, Harrison RF. Peritoneal leakage of gastric contents, a rare complication of
percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. J Parenter
Enteral Nutr 1996; 20: 433-434.
11. Froehlich F, Gonvers JJ, Vader JP, Dubois RW,
Burnand B. Appropriateness of gastrointestinal
endoscopy: risk of complications. Endoscopy 1999;
31: 684-686.
12. Eisen GM, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, et al. Complications of upper GI endoscopy. GastrointestEndosc
2002;55: 784-793.
13. Dumortier J, Lapalus MG, Pereira A, et al. Unsedated transnasal PEG placement. Gastrointest Endosc
2004; 59: 54-57.
14. Wolfsen HC, Hemminger LL, Achem SR, et al. Complications of endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract: a single-center experience. Mayo Clin Proc
2004; 79: 1264-1267.
15. Hillman KM. Pneumoperitoneum-a review. Crit Care
Med 1982; 10: 476-481.
16. Tominaga K, Saigusa Y, Ito S, et al. Percutaneous
endoscopic gastrostomy with the aid of a colonoscope to avoid gastrocolic fistula formation. Endoscopy 2007:39:112-3.
17. Ahmad I, Mouncher A, Abdoolah A, et al. Antibiotic
prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy- a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial.
Aliment pharmacol Ther 2003; 18: 209-215.
18. Johnston SD, Tham TCK, Mason M. Death after
PEG: results of the National Confidental Enquiry
into patient outcome and death. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; sayfaya bak
19. Lockett MA, Templeton ML, Byrne TK, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy complications in a
tertiary-care center. Am Surg 2002; 68: 117-120.
20. Cortez-Pinto H, Correia AP, Camilo ME, et al. Longterm management of percutaneous endoscopic
gastrostomy by a nutritional support team. Clin
Nutr 2002; 21: 27-31.
21. Tham TC, Taitelbaum G, Carr-Locke DL. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies: are they being done
for the right reasons? Q J Med 1997; 90: 495-49

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com