You are here

TIMSS 2011 Öğretmen Ölçeklerinin Faktör Yapısının ve Psikometrik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi

Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the TIMSS 2011 Teacher Questionnaires

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
10.15285/maruaebd.270383
Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Large scale evaluations, effective on decision making periods about the countries’ educational policies, are coming into prominence day by day. Even though these practices generally seem to be focused on monitoring student success, they provide feedback about all the components of the system. PISA and TIMSS practices are prominent ones among these evaluations. In this study, teacher scales were used in regard to TIMSS 2011 in which these scales were practiced. Data acquired from 8th grade math teachers were used. The study was put in practice with the participation of 106 female (%45) and 132 male (%55) 238 teachers in total, working at TIMSS 2011 Turkey sample. Regarding the Scores received from implementation of 7 scales which were used second level analysis was put into practice. Exploratory factor analysis were carried out first, in accordance with the results of these analysis confirmatory factor analysis were practiced. In the stage of determining the factors concerning the scale, in addition to the factor analysis parallel analysis acquired with the Monte Carlo simulation were practiced. According to the results of the exploratory factor analysis, the teacher characteristics effective on student success were observed to have a two-dimensional structure. The two-dimensional structure was observed to represent the 52% of the variance of the teacher characteristics. In this direction the results of the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the two-dimensional structure of the scale has great adaptive values. When the two-dimensional structure was examined based on the literature, it has been observed that these two dimensions have the characteristics of teachers’ educational/professional and personal/organizational aspects. Factors were named in this manner. The results of the study show that the scale is a valid and reliable one to be used in the studies concerning the characteristics of teachers.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Ülkelerin eğitim politikaları ile ilgili karar verme süreçlerinde etkili olan geniş ölçekli değerlendirmeler gün geçtikçe önem kazanmaktadır. Bu uygulamalar çoğunlukla öğrenci başarılarını izlemeye odaklanmış görünse de sistemde yer alan tüm bileşenlerle ilgili geri bildirimlerde bulunmaktadır. PISA ve TIMSS uygulamaları bu değerlendirmeler arasında öne çıkan uygulamalardır. Bu araştırma TIMSS 2011 uygulaması Türkiye örneklemi esas alınarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler TIMSS 2011 uygulamasında 8. sınıf matematik öğretmenlerine yöneltilen öğretmen ölçeklerinden elde edilmiştir. Bu veriler TIMSS 2011 Türkiye örnekleminde yer alan okullarda 106’sı bayan (% 45) ve 132’si erkek (%55) toplam 238 öğretmenden elde edilmiştir. Kullanılan 7 ölçekten elde edilen toplam puanlar dikkate alınarak analizler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada kullanılan ölçeklere önce açımlayıcı faktör analizi uygulanmış ve elde edilen sonuçlar doğrultusunda da doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. Ölçeğe ilişkin faktörlerin belirlenmesi aşamasında açımlayıcı faktör analizine ek olarak monte carlo simülasyonu ile elde edilen paralel analizden de yararlanılmıştır. Yapılan açımlayıcı faktör analizi ve paralel analiz sonucu öğrenci başarılarına etki eden öğretmen karakteristiklerinin iki boyutlu bir yapıya sahip olduğu görülmüştür. İki boyutlu bu yapının öğretmen karakteristiklerine ilişkin varyansın yaklaşık %52’sini açıkladığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Bu doğrultuda yapılan doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonuçları ölçeğin iki boyutlu yapısının iyi uyum değerlerine sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Ortaya çıkan iki boyutlu yapı literatüre dayalı olarak incelendiğinde bu iki boyutun öğretmenlerin öğretimsel/profesyonel ve kişisel/organizasyonel yönlerine ilişkin özelliklerini taşıdığı görülmüştür. Faktörler bu şekilde isimlendirilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları ölçeğin öğretmen özelliklerine ilişkin yapılacak araştırmalarda kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olduğunu göstermektedir.
21
36

REFERENCES

References: 

Armor, D., Conry-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N., McDonnell, L., Pascal, A., Pauly, E.,ve Zellman, G.
(1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading program in selected Los Angeles minority school.
Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Ashton, P. T., Olejnik, S., Crocker, L. ve McAuliffe, M. (1982). Measurement problems in the study of teachers’
sense of efficacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research
Association, New York.
Aydın, M. (2015) Öğrenci ve okul kaynaklı faktörlerin TIMSS matematik başarısına etkisi, Yayımlanmamış
Doktora Tezi. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi. Konya
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature
and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175-189.
Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C. ve Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity.
Teaching and teacher education, 20(2), 107-128.
Brophy, J. E. ve Evertson, C. (1977). Teacher behaviors and student learning in second and third grades.
In G. D. Borich (Ed.), The appraisal of teaching: Concepts and process (pp. 79-95). Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley
Burden, P. (1980). Teachers’ Perceptions of the Characteristics and Influences of their Personal and
Professional Development. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40: 5404A
Chen, J. (2010). Chinese middle school teacher job satisfaction and its relationships with teacher moving.
Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(3), 263-272.
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve
LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education policy analysis archives,
8, 1.
Day, C., Kington, A., Stobart, G., & Sammons, P. (2006). The personal and professional selves of teachers:
stable and unstable identities. British educational research journal, 32(4), 601-616.
Dinham, S., & Scott, C. (2002). “The international Teacher 2000 Project: an international study of teacher
and school executive satisfaction, motivation and health in Australia, England, USA, Malta and
New Zealand”, paper presented at the Challenging Futures Conference, University of New England,
Armidale.
Flores, M.A., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multiperspective
study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(2), 219–232.
Foshay, A. W. (1962). Educational Achievements of Thirteen-year Olds in Twelve Countries: Results of an
International Research Project, 1959-61 (Vol. 4). Unesco.
Green, L. S. ve Casale-Giannola, D. (2011). 40 Active Learning Strategies for the Inclusive Classroom, Grades
K–5. Corwin Press.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age.
Teachers College Press.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
Henson, R. K. (2002). From adolescent angst to adulthood: Substantive implications and measurement
dilemmas in the development of teacher efficacy research. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 137-
150.
35
TIMSS 2011 Öğretmen Ölçeklerinin Faktör Yapısının ve Psikometrik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi
Hoy, W. K. ve Miskel, C. G. (2005). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (7th ed). New
York: McGraw-Hill
Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J. ve Hoy, A. W. (2006). Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement.
American educational research journal, 43(3), 425-446.
Hu, L. T. ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional
criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1),
1-55.
Kirsch, I., Lennon, M., von Davier, M., Gonzalez, E. ve Yamamoto, K. (2013). On the Growing Importance
of International Large-Scale Assessments. In The Role of International Large-Scale Assessments:
Perspectives from Technology, Economy, and Educational Research (pp. 1-11). Springer Netherlands.
Michaelowa, K. ve Wittmann, E. (2007). The cost, satisfaction, and achievement of primary education-
Evidence from Francophone Sub-Saharan Africa. The Journal of Developing Areas, 51-78.
Mislevy, R. J. (1995). What can we learn from international assessments?.ETS Research Report Series,
1995(1), i-32.
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P. ve Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Herengracht 487,
Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands.
Naemi, B., E. Gonzalez, J. Bertling, A. Betancourt, J. Burrus, P. Kyllonen, J. Minsky, P. Lietz, E. Klieme,
S. Vieluf, J. Lee ve R.D. Roberts, (2011). Large-scale group score assessments: Past, present, and
future. In Oxford handbook of psychological assessment of children and adolescents, eds. Saklofske
D., and Schwean V. (Cambridge, MA: Oxford University Press).
Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O. ve Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Sage
Publications.
Nichols, V. I. (2002). The Impact of Workplace Conditions on Teacher Commitment,
Teaching and Learning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The Union
Institute Graduate School.
Nilsen, T. ve Gustafsson, J. E. (2014). School emphasis on academic success: exploring changes in science
performance in Norway between 2007 and 2011 employing two-level SEM. Educational Research
and Evaluation,20(4), 308-327.
O’connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel
analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers, 32(3), 396-
402.
OECD (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris: OECD
Publication.
OECD (2014). A Teachers’ Guide to TALIS 2013: Teaching and Learning International Survey, TALIS, OECD
Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264216075-en
Pillen, M. T., Den Brok, P. J., & Beijaard, D. (2013). Profiles and change in beginning teachers’ professional
identity tensions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 86-97.
Rodgers, C., & Scott, K. (2008). The development of the personal self and professional identity in learning
to teach. içinde M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D.J. McIntyre & K.E. Demers (Eds.),
Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions and changing contexts (pp. 732–
755). New York: Routledge.
Ruohotie-Lyhty, M. (2013). Struggling for a professional identity: Two newly qualified language teachers’
identity narratives during the first years at work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 120-129.
Mustafa AYDIN
36
Sachs, J. (2005). Teacher education and the development of professional identity: Learning to be a teacher.
In P. Denicolo & M. Kompf (Eds.), Connecting policy and practice: Challenges for teaching and
learning in schools and universities (pp. 5–21). Oxford: Routledge.
Sanders, M. G., Epstein, J. L. ve Connors-Tadros, L. (1999). Family partnerships with high schools: The parents’
perspective (Report No. 32). Baltimore: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at
Risk. (ERIC, ED428148). Erişim tarihi Mayıs 15,2014, http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/
ericdocs2/content_storage_01/0000000b/80/11/ 5b/6a.pdf
Sanders, W. L., Wright, S. P. ve Horn, S. P. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student
achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of personnel evaluation in education,
11(1), 57-67.
Schleicher, A. (2012). Building a High-Quality Teaching Profession. Lessons from around the world.
Educational Studies, (1), 74-92.
Sleegers, P. ve Kelchtermans, G. (1999). Introduction to the theme issue: teachers’ professional identity.
Pedagogisch Tijdschrift, 24(4), 369-373.
Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları,
3(6), 49-74.
Sumsion, J. (2002). Becoming, being and unbecoming an early childhood educator: A phenomenological
case study of teacher attrition. Teaching and teacher education, 18(7), 869-885.
Şişman, M., Acat, M. B., Aypay, A. ve Karadağ, E. (2011). TIMSS 2007 ulusal matematik fen raporu: 8.
sınıflar. Ankara: EARGED Yayınları.
Tabachnick, B. ve G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Tschannen-Moran, M. ve Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and
teacher education, 17(7), 783-805.
van Veen, K., Sleegers, P., & van de Ven, P. (2005). One teacher’s identity, emotions, and commitment to
change: A case study into the cognitive–affective processes of a secondary school teacher in the
context of reforms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 917–934.
Wayne, A. J. ve Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review
of Educational research, 73(1), 89-122.
Williams, C. (1995). An Investigative Study of the Relationship of the Physical Environment to Teacher
Professionalism in the State of Mississippi Public Schools. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation,
Jackson State University.
Younghusband, L. J. (2005). High School Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Working Environment in
Newfoundland: A Grounded Theory Study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Memorial
University of Newfoundland.
Yücel, C., Karadağ, E., & Turan, S. (2013, Şubat). TIMSS 2011 ulusal ön değerlendirme raporu. Eskişehir
Osmangazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitimde Politika Analizi Raporlar Serisi I, Eskişehir.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com