You are here

Organize Suçlarla Ortak Mücadelenin Analizinde Ağ Analiz Araç ve Yöntemleri

NETWORK ANLYSIS TOOLS AND METHODS IN ANALYZING COORDINATED RESPONSE AGAINST ORGANIZED CRIME

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Building a strong and effective relationship among criminal justice (CJ) agencies is an essential component of investigation and prosecution of organized crimes. This research is unique in terms of bringing new perspective of analyzing interorganizational collaboration and relations by using social network analysis (SNA) in the process of crime investigation and prosecution. In this study, factors encouraging and hindering collective action among judicial organizations in response to organized crime are derived from literature and this conceptual framework is discussed for the purposes of usability of network analysis tools and methods. Findings of the study revealed that network size, centrality and cliques in the network can be investigated based on six factors in proposed model. In this regard, legal and policy framework found to be related to network size. Centrality of organizations, on the other hand, affected by trust, organizational structure and priority perceptions. Finally, competition among agencies and criminal links to the organization found to be important in the formation of subgroups and cliques within the CJ network.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Ceza adalet sistemi kurumları arasında güçlü ve etkili bir işbirliği ve ilişki kurulması organize suçların soruşturulması ve kovuşturulmasının önemli bir unsurudur. Bu çalışma, suç soruşturma ve kovuşturmasında sosyal ağ analizini kullanarak kurumlar arası işbirliği ve ilişkilerin incelenmesine yeni bir perspektif getirmesi açısından özgün bir araştırmadır. Bu çalışmada, organize suçlara karşı yargı organlarının birlikte hareket etmelerini teşvik eden ve bunu engelleyen faktörler yazından çıkarılmış ve bu teorik çerçeve ağ analizi araç ve yöntemlerinin kullanılabilirliği açısından tartışılmıştır. Araştırmanın bulguları, önerilen modeldeki altı etmen açısından ağın büyüklüğü, merkeziyet ve ağ içindeki alt grupların incelenebileceğini ortaya koymuştur. Bununla ilgili olarak, yasal çerçevenin ağın büyüklüğü ile ilgili olduğu bulunmuştur. Diğer taraftan, kurumların ağ içindeki merkeziliğinin güven, kurumsal yapı ve kurumların önceliklerinden etkilendiği tespit edilmiştir. Son olarak, kurumlar arası rekabet ve kurumlara olan suç bağlantılarının ağ içinde alt grupların oluşumunda etkili olduğu bulunmuştur.
75-99

REFERENCES

References: 

Agranoff, Robert, (2006), “Inside collaborative networks: Ten lesson for
public managers”, Public Administration Review, V.66, N.1, pp.56-
65.
Alexander, Ernest, (1995), How Organizations Act Together:
Interorganizational Coordination in Theory and Practice,
Luxembourg: Gordon and Breach Publishers.
Bardach, Eugene, (1998), Getting Agencies Work Together: The practice
and Theory of Managerial Craftmanship, Washington, DC: The
Brookings Institution.
Benson, Michael and Cullen, Francis, (1998), Combating Corporate
Crime: Local Prosecutors at Work, Boston: Northeastern University
Press.
Broussine, Michael and Miller, Christ, (2005), “Leadership, ethical
dilemmas and 'good' authority in public service partnership
working”, Business Ethics: A European Review, V.14, N.4, pp.379-
391.
Burt, Ronald, (1992), Structural Holes: The Social Structure of
Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Butler, Richard and Gill, Jaz, (1995), Learning and knowledge in jointventures:
The importance of trust, Paper presented to the British
Academy of Management annual conference, Sheffield.
Cole, George F., (1985), “The Decision to Prosecute”, in Criminal
Justice: Law and Politics, Cole, G.F. Eds.; Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
Comfort, Louise and Kapucu, Naim, (2006), “Inter-organizational
coordination in extreme events: The World Trade Center Attack,
September 11, 2001”, Natural Hazards: Journal of the International
Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, V.39,
N.2, pp.309-327.
Crawford, Adam and Jones, Matthew, (1995), “Inter-agency co-operation
and community-based crime prevention. Some Reflections on the
Work of Pearson and Colleagues”, British Journal of Criminology,
V.35, N.1, pp.17-33.
Das, T. K. and Teng, Bing-Sheng, (1998), “Between trust and control:
Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances”, Academy
of Management Review, V.23, N.3, pp.491-512.
Elsner, Beatrix; Lewis, Chris and Zila, Josef, (2008), “Police Prosecution
Service Relationship within Criminal Investigation”, European
Journal of Criminal Policy, V.14, pp.203-224.
Fellman, Philip Vos and Wright, Roxana, (2004), Modeling Terrorist
Networks-Complex Systems at the Mid-Range, Paper delivered to the
International Conference on Complex Systems, New England
Complex Systems Institute, Boston, pp.16-21.
Gul, Serdar Kenan, (2010), “Karşılaştırmalı Ceza Adaleti Çalışmalarının
Suçla Mücadeledeki Rolü ve Önemi”, Türk İdare Dergisi, Yıl 82,
Sayı 466, ss.161-173, (available online at: http://www.tid.gov.tr/
Makaleler/466skenangul.pdf).
Gulati, Ranjay, (1995), “Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of
repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances”, Academy of
Management Journal, V.38, N.1, pp.85-112.
Gulati, Ranjay and Gargiulo, Martin, (1999), “Where do interorganizational
networks come from?”, American Journal of
Sociology, V.104, pp.1439-1493.
Hanneman, Robert A. and Riddle, Mark, (2001), Introduction to Social
Network Methods, Unpublished Textbook (available online at
www.faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman) [accessed on March 18, 2009].
Heinz, John P. and Manikas, Peter, (1992), “Networks among elites in a
local criminal justice system”, Law& Society Review, V.26, pp.831-
861.
Hough, Michael and Tilley, Nick, (1998), Auditing Crime and Disorder:
Guidance for Local Partnerships, (Crime Detection and Prevention
Series Paper 91.) London, UK: Home Office.
Kapucu, Naim, (2005), “Interorganizational Coordination in Dynamic
Context: Networks in Emergency Response Management”,
Connections, V.26, N.2, pp.33-48.
Kenney, Michael, (2007), From Pablo to Osama: Trafficking and
Terrorist Networks, Government Bureaucracies, and Competitive
Adaptation, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University
Press.
Martin, Lawrence, (2006), Privatization: Looking Backward, Looking
Forward, Annual Privatization Report, Los Angeles: The Reasons
Foundation, pp.42-44.
Minor, Kevin; Fox, James W. and Wells, James, (2002), “An Analysis of
Interagency Communication Patterns Surrounding Incidents of
School Crime”, Journal of School Violence, V.1, N.4, pp.81-100.
Koschade, Stuart, (2006), “A Social Network Analysis of Jemaah
Islamiyah: The Applications to Counterterrorism and Intelligence”,
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, V.29, N.6, pp.589-605.
Krebs, Valdis, (2002), “Mapping Networks of Terrorist Cells”,
Connections, V.24, N.3, pp.43-52.
Krueathep, Weerasak; Riccucci, Norma M. and Suwanmala, Charas,
(2008), “Why Do Agencies Work Together? The Determinants of
Network Formation at the Subnational Level of Government in Thailand”,
Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, V.18,
N.3, pp.375-396.
Liddle, A. Mark and Gelsthorpe, Loraine, (1994), Crime Prevention and
Inter-Agency Co-operation: Paper 53, Crime Prevention Unit, Head
Office.
McAllister, Daniel, (1995), “Affect-and cognition-based trust as
foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations”,
Academy of Management Journal, V.38, N.1, pp.24-59.
McGuire, Michael, (2006), “Collaborative public management: Assessing
what we know and how we know it”, Public Administration Review,
V.66, pp.33-43.
Monge, Peter R. and Contractor, Noshir, (2003), Theories of
Communication Networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
Oliver, Christine, (1990), “Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships:
Integration and Future Directions”, The Academy of Management
Review, V.15, N.2 pp.241-265.
Oliver, Amalya, (1997), “On the nexus of organizations and profession:
Networking through trust”, Sociological Inquiry, V.67, N.2, pp.227-
245.
Provan, Keith. G. and Milward, Brinton, (1995), “A Preliminary Theory
of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study
of Four Community Mental Health Systems”, Administrative Science
Quarterly, V.40, pp.1-33.
Puonti, Anne, (2004), Learning to work together: collaboration between
authorities in economic-crime investigation, PhD thesis: University
of Helsinki, Department of Education, Center for Activity Theory
and Developmental Work Research (Helsinki: University of Helsinki).
Rosenbaum, Dennis P., (2002), “Evaluating Multi-agency Anti-crime
Partnerships: Theory, Design and Measurement Issues”, Crime
Prevention Studies, V.14, pp.171-225.
Ring, Peter Smith, (1997), Processes facilitating reliance on trust in interorganizational
networks, in M. Ebers (Ed.), The formation of interorganizational
Networks, pp.114-145. Oxford, UK: Oxford
University Press.
Scott, John, (2000), Social Network Analysis, Thousand Oak, CA: Sage
Publications.
Stern, Vivien, (1987), “Crime prevention-the inter-organizational
approach”, Probation and the Community: A Practice and Policy
Reader, 209.
Unlu, Ali and Kapucu, Naim, (2009), “Interorganizational Response Networks
in Fight against Crime by Police Agencies”, Journal of
Policing, V.11, N.1 pp.47-72.
Vangen, Siv and Huxam, Chris, (2003), Nurturing Collaborative Relations:
Building Trust in Interorganizational Collaboration, The Journal
of Applied Behavioral Science, V.39, N.1, pp.5-31.
Wasserman, Stanley and Faust, Katherine, (1994), Social Network
Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Webb, Adrian, (1991), “Coordination: A problem in public sector
management”, Policy and Politics, V.19, N.4, pp.229-241.
White, Leroy, (2008), “Connecting organizations: developing the idea of
network learning in inter-organizational settings”, Systems Research
and Behavioral Science, V.25, N.6, pp.701-717.
Williams, Phil, (2001), ‘Transnational Criminal Networks’, in J. Arquilla
and D.F. Ronfeldt (Eds), Networks and Netwars, The Future of
Terror, Crime, and Militancy. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com