You are here

Home » Content

Terörizm, Liberal Devlet ve Uluslararası İşbirliği

TERRORISM, LİBERAL STATE AND INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION

Journal Name:

  • Polis Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2002

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This article aims to discuss why liberal states have great difficıılty in implementing counter terrorism strategies. To this end, first, some brief information is given about three actors; the state, the terrorists and the public audience. Second, probleıns of counter -terrorism strategies are discussed. Third, the importance of international co-operation is emphasised. Public opinion is ınost important actor for a successful counter terrorism campaign. States must act within the law, otherwise states themselves can be regarded as "terrorist". ritates' problems in their wars against terrorism are discussed within four categories; kJdeterrence, intelligence and early warning, def ense, and retaliation. While discussing these diffıculties, some examples are given from different parts of the world, including examples from PKK and US campaign in Afghanistan. In combating terrorism, the ınost important need is international co-operation between states. The international community must prevent terrorism from being used as a foreign policy instrument. Otherwise, the world order and international peace can be badly undermined.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makale neden liberal devletlerin anti terör stratejilerini uygulamada büyük güçlükler çektiğini tartışmaktadır. Bu amaca yönelik olarak, öncelikle devlet, teröristler ve kamuoyu ile ilgili kısa bilgiler verilmiştir. İkinci olarak, anti terör stratejilerinin problemleri tartışılmıştır. Üçüncü olarak, uluslararası işbirliğinin önemi vurgulanmıştır. Kamuoyu başarılı bir mücadele için en önemli aktördür. Devletler hukukun sınırları içinde hareket etmelidirler, aksi takdirde devletlerin kendileri "terörist" konumuna düşerler.Devletlerin teröre karşı savaşlarında karşı karşıya kaldıkları problemler dört başlık altında ele alındı: caydırıcılık, istihbarat ve erken uyarı, savunma, ve misilleme. Makalede bu zorluklar tartışılırken PKK ve ABD'nin Afganistan operasyonu dahil olmak üzere dünyanın farklı yerlerinden örnekler verilmiştir.rperörle mücadelede, en önemli ihtiyaç uluslararası işbirliğidir. Uluslararası camia terörizmin dış politika aracı olarak kullanılmasını önlemelidir. Aksi takdirde, dünya düzeni ve uluslararası barış çok büyük yaralar alacaktır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-terorizm-liberal-devlet-uluslararasi-isbirligi.pdf
  • 1
47-64
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Bal, İdris. (1996), "European Union, Turkic Republics and Turkish Dilemma",
Pakistan Horizon, Vol.49, No.l, January, pp.77. Bal, İdris. (2001), "Soğuk Savaş Sonrası Türk Dış Politikası İçin Türk
Cumhuriyetleri'nin Önemi", İdris Bal, (Ed.), 21. Yüzyılın Eşiğinde Türk Dış
Politikası, İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları, ss.332-333. Betts R. (1982), Surprise Attack, Washington: Brookings Institution. Betts, Richard K. (1980-1981), "Surprise Despite Warning: Why Sudden Attacks
Succeed", Political Science Quarterly, Vol.95, No.4, Winter. Betts, Richard K. (October 1978), "Analysis War and Decision: Why intelligence
Failure are inevitable", World Politics, Vol.31. Borg, P.W. (1988), "The Evolution of U.S. Anti-Terrorism Policy", C.N
Livingstone and T. E. Arnold (Ed.), Beyond the Iran Contra Crisis,
Lexington: Lexington Books, pp.11-12. Bölükbaşı, Süha. (1993), "Turkey Challenges Iraq and Syria: The Euphrates
Dispute", Journal of South Asian Middle Eastern Studies, Vol.16, No.4,
Summer, pp.9-32.
Clavvson, P. (1987), "We need more but better coverage of Terrorism", Orbis, Winter.
Duna, Cem. (1988), "Turkey's peace Pipeline", Joyce R. Starr and C. Stoll (Ed.),
The Politics ofscarcity, London: Westview Press, pp.l 19-124. Freedman, Lavvrence. (1986), Terrorism and International Order, Nevv York:
Routledge Kegan Paul Ltd., pp.l9. Holsti, KJ. (1992), İnternational Politics, Nevv Jersey: Prentice-Hall
International, Inc., pp.235. İnan, Kamran. (1989), "South-East Anatolian Project (GAP)", Turkish Review,
Vol.4, No.20, Summer, pp.53. Jenkins, Brian M. (1985), "Will Terrorists go Nuclear", Orbis, Fail, p.511. Kegley, Charles W. And Wittkopf, Eugene R. (1989), World Politics, Nevv York:
St. Martins Press, pp.416. Kuniholm, Bruce R. (1991), "Turkey and the West", Foreign Affairs, Vol.70,
No.2, Spring, pp.40.
Laquer, Walter. (1986), "Reflections on Terrorism", Foreign Affairs No-65 pp.88.
Livingston, C. N. (1988), "Nevv Media Strategies for Addressing Terrorism", C.
N. Livingston and T. E. Arnold (Ed.), Beyond the Iran Contra Crises,
Lexington: Lexington Books, pp.120. Ofri, Arie. (1984), "intelligence and Counter-Terrorism", Orbis, Spring. Robertson, D. (1986), Dictionary of Politics, London: Penguin Books, pp.307.
64
Polis Bilimleri Dergisi
Robins, P. (1991), Turkey and Middle East, London: Pinter Publishers, pp.49-53. Rovvley, Gvvyn. (1993), "Multinational and National Competition for Water in
the Middle East: Tovvards the Deepening Crisis", Journal of Environinental
Management, Vol.39, No.3, November, pp.188. Seyfi Taşhan, Head of the Foreign Policy Institute, the speech delivered at the
meeting organised by the Royal Institute of International Affairs on 13-14
January 1992, "Turkey from Marginality to Centrality", Turkish Review,
Vol.6, No.27, Spring 1992, pp.53). Sezer, Duygu Bazoğlu. (1992), "Threat Perceptions in Southern Europe: The
Case of Turkey", Laszlo Valki (Ed.), Changing Threat Perceptions and
Military Doctrines, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, pp.234-235. The Economist, 18 June 1987, pp.52-58.
Wilkinson, P. (1977), Terrorism and Liberal State, London: Macmillan Press Ltd., pp.122-123.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com