You are here

PİRİNÇ YETİŞTİRME İÇİN FİZİKSEL ARAZİ DEĞERLENDİRME UYGUNLUK CBS MODELİ UYGULAMASI

APPLICATION OF GIS MODEL IN PHYSICAL LAND EVALUATION SUITABILITY FOR RICE CULTIVATION

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The objective of this study was to establish spatial model in land evaluation for rice cultivation using GIS in Bafra Plain found in the Kızılırmak Delta and located in the central Black Sea region of Turkey. The study area covers about 4823.7 ha. A land unit resulted from the overlay process of the selected theme layers has unique information of land qualities for which the suitability is based on. The selected theme layers of rice include topographic factor (slope), soil physical factors (soil depth, soil texture, drainage, stoniness, hydraulic conductivity) and soil chemical factors (pH, electrical conductivity, CaCO3 and soil fertility). These theme layers were collected from existing information. Spatial information of soil physical and soil chemical factors were formulated using soil map database. Slope layer of the study area was prepared from DEM. Each land characteristics is also considered as a thematic layer in the GIS. In addition, each of land quality layers with associated attribute data is digitally encoded in a GIS database. After combination of these layers, a resultant map was produced. Land suitability rating model applied to the resultant polygonal layer provided the suitability classes for field crops. Results showed that 79% of the study area is highly and moderately suitable for field crops, whereas 21% of the study area is low and non suitable for rice cultivation due to soil and land conditions. The resultant suitability classes were also checked with field experiment study. 12 rice species were used in experiments. ANOVA was done for grain yield and LSD005 test was implemented for comparison of mean values in the TARIST statistics package. According to ANOVA results, it was found significantly positive relationship between land suitability classes and grain yield values. The grain yield values were affected at level of P<0.001 by land suitability class. In general, the highest grain yield was obtained from rice plots located in S1 class, S2 and S3 classes followed it as well. As for LSD005 test results, the highest yield values were determined Halil Bey (789.9a), Osmancık-97 (760.5ab) and Durağan (751.0b) in 12 rice species for S1 class while, the highest yield values were found Osmancık-97 (696.1a), Şumnu (688.8ab) and Neğiş (654.1bc) in 12 rice species for S3 class.
184-191

REFERENCES

References: 

Aronoff, S., 1991. Geographic Information System: A management perspective. WLD Publ. Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Bunting, E.S., 1981. Assessments of the effects on yield of variations in climate and soil characteristics for twenty crop species. Centre for Soil Research. Bogor, Indonesia. UNDP/FAO, AGOF/INS/78/006 Technical Note No. 12. 58 p.
Champbell, J.B. 1987. Introduction to remote sensing. The Guilford press, New York.
FAO, 1983. Guidelines : Land Evaluation for Rainfed Agriculture Soils Bulletin No. 52 Rome.
FAO, 1985. Guidelines: land evaluation for irrigated agriculture. FAO Soils Bulletin No. 55. FAO Rome.
FAO, 1993. Guideline for land use planning. FAO development series No: 1, ROME.
FAO, 2003. Rice Irrigation in the Near East Current Situation and Prospects for Improvement. Regional Office for the Near East.Cairo, Egypt p.24.
Gençtan, T., 2009. Türkiye'de çeltik üretimi ve sorunları. I.
Ulusal Çeltik Sempozyumu, Tekirdağ-Türkiye. Green, K., 1995. Using GIS to predict fire behaviour. J.
Forestry, 93: 21-25. Garg, P.K., 1991. Development of a catchments scale
erosion model for semiarid environment and its
implementation through Remote Sensing. PhD Thesis.
University of Bristol, UK. Hinton, J.C., 1996. GIS and RS Integration for
Environmental Applications. Int. J. Geo. Inf. Sys., 10:
877-890.
Mongkolsawat, C.P., Thirangoon, Kuptawutinan, P., 2002. A physical evaluation of landsuitability for rice: A methodological study using GIS. Computer Centre, Khon Kaen University, Thailand (online at http://www. gisdevelopment.net).
Özcan, H., 2004. Çinko Uygulamasının Bazı Çeltik Çeşitlerinde Verim İle Tanede Çinko, Fosfor ve Fitin Asidi Konsantrasyonuna Etkisi. A.Ü. Fen Bil. Ens. Toprak Anabilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi, Ankara.
Perera, L.K,
Kajiwara
, K., Tateishi, R., 1993. Land suitability assessment by GIS for paddy cultivation in SriLanka. With a concern on environmental protection Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS apos;93. Better Understanding of Earth Environment, 4:
2076-2078.
Soil Survey Staff, 1999. Soil Taxonomy. USDA
Agricultural Handbook No:436.
Sönmez
, B. 2003. Türkiye Çoraklık Kontrol Rehberi. T.C
Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı Köy Hizmetleri Genel
Müdürlüğü, Toptak ve Gübre Araştırma Enstitüsü.
Teknik Yayın No: 33. Sürek, H. 1998. Rice production and research in Turkey.
International Rice Commission Newsletter, FAO, 47,
Rome.
Sys. C., Ranst, V., Debaveye, J., Beernaert, F., 1993. Land Evaluation Part III, crop requirements. Agr publication
No. 7, ITC Ghent.
TARIS. 1994. Statistical program of the Awgean University of Agricultural Research, Aegean Forest Institute press, Izmir-Turkey.
Van Diepen, C.A., Van Keulen, H., Wolf, J., Berkhout,
J.A.A., 1991. Land evaluation: from intuition to quantification. In: Stewart BA (ed) Advances in Soil Science. Springer, New York, USA, pp 139-204. Yamada, Y., Suzuki, M., Amorndham, W., Sukjarn, S.,
1995. Plan of the Construction of GIS for Northeast
Thailand.
http://www.gisdevelopment.net/aars/acrs/1995/worksho p1/ws005.asp
191

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com