You are here

Home » Content

ÇÜRÜKLÜ VE ÇÜRÜKSÜZ BİREYLERDE TÜKÜRÜK KARBONİK ANHİDRAZ AKTİVİTELERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

THE COMPARISON OF SALIVA CARBONIC ANHYDRASE ACTIVITIES IN CARRIOUS AND NONCARRIOUS SUBJECTS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2000

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
11 is known that physical and biological properties of salivLL play a role in dental caries. Carbonic anhydrase in saliva produces bicarbonate buffer by catalyzing carbonic acid. Tn ihis study, saliva carbonic anhydrase activity levels were investigated in carrious and noncarrious subjects. Saliva samples were collected from 15 camous and 15 noncarrious subjects which are 20-25 years of age. Carbonic anhydrase activity per mg total protein was determined by using C02 as substrate. In noncarnous subjects, carbonic anhydrase activity was determined in hi"h level. When carbonic anhydrase activity levels of this two groups were statistically compared, significant difference was found
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Tükürüğün fiziksel ve biyolojik özelliklerinin di* çürüğünde rol oynadığı bilinmektedir Tükürükteki karbonik anhidraz, karbonik asili katalizleyerek, bikarbonat tamponunu üretmektedir. Bu çalışmada, çürük! ti ve cürüksıız bireylerde tükürük karbonik aııhidraz aküvite dü/eylerı incelenmiştir. 20-25 yaş grubundaki 15 çürük!U vc 15 çürükaüz bireyden tükürük örneklen alınmıştır. Mg total protein başına düşen karbonik anhidra/. aktivitesi, substrat olarak CO^in kullanjlmasıyla belirlenmiştir. Çürüksün bireylerde karbonik anhidraz aktivitesi yüksek dü/eyde belirlenmiştir. Bu iki grubun karbonik aııhidraz aktivite değerleri istatistiksel 'olarak karşılaştırıldığında, anlamlı fark bulunmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-curuklu-curuksuz-bireylerde-tukuruk-karbonik-anhidraz-aktivitelerinin-karsilastirilmasi.pdf
  • 1
1-3
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Bradford MM, A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quanlites of proton utilizing the principle of protcin-dyc binding. Anal Biochem 1976; 72: 248-51,
2. Feltslein JB, Silverman DN- Purification and characterization of carbonic anhydrase from the saliva of the rat, J Biol Che m 1984; 259: 5447-53.
3 Fernlcy RT, Darling P, Aldrcd P, Wright RD, Coghlan TP. Tissue and species distribution ol the secreted carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme. Biochem J 1989; 259: 91-6.
4. Fernlcy RT, Farthing J, Cooper EJ. Radioimmunoassay ftxr salivary carbonic anhydrase m human parotid saliva. Arch Oral Biol 1995;40: 567-9.
5. Fleming RE, Parkkila S, Parkkila A-K, Rajaniemi H Waheed A, Sly WS. Carbonic anhydrase IV in rat and human gastrointestinal tract: Regional cellular and subcellular localization. J Clin Invest 1995; 96: 2907-13.
6 Holbrook WP. Dental caries and cariogenic factors in pre-school urban Icelandic children, Caries Res 1993; 27:431-7-,
7. Kıvela J, Parkkila S, Parkkila A-K, Rajaniemi H. A low concentration of carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme VI in whole saliva is associated with caries prevalence. 1999; 33: 178-84.
8. Kivela J, Parkkila S, Wahecd A, Parkkila A-K, Sly WS, Riijamcmi H. Secretory carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme (CA VI) inhuman serum. Clin Che m 1997; 43: 23 18-22.
9 Lagcrlüf F Olivcby A. Caries protective factors in saliva. Adv Dent Res ] 994, 8: 229-38.
t0, 1-amkin MS, Oppenheirn FG. Structural features of salivary function. Cm Rev Biol Med 1993: 4: 25 I -9.
11. Mandel ID. Role of saliva in maintaining oral homeostasis. ,1 Am Dent Assoc 1989; 119: 298-304.
12. Mfiren TH. A simplified mkramethod for the determination of carbonic anhydrase and its inhibitors. J Pharmac EspTher 19(50; 160: 26-30.
13. Murakami H, Sly WS. Pun He ati on and characterization of human salivary carbonic anhydrase. 1987; 262: 1382-88.
14. Parkkila S, Kaunısto K, Rajaniemi L, Kumpulaineıi T. .lokincn K, Rajaniemi H. Immunohistochemical localization ol" carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes VI, II and I in human parotid and submandibular glands. J Histochem Cytnchem 1990; 38: 941-7.
15 Parkkila S, Parkkila A-K. Carbonic anhydrase in the alimentary tract: Roles of the different isoenzymes and salivary factors in the maintenance of optimal conditions in the gastrointestinal canal. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996; 31: .305-17.
16. Parkkila S, Parkkila A-K, Juvoncn '1', Rajaniemi H. Distribution of the carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes !, II, and IV in the human alimentary tract. Gut 1994; 33: 646-50.
17 Parkkila S, Parkkila A-K, Ixhtola J, Rcinila A, Södervig H-J, Rannisio M, Rajaniemi H. Salivary carbonic anhydrase protects gastroesophageal mucosa from acid injury. Dig Dis Sci 1997; 42: 1013-19.
18. Parkkila S, Parkkila A-K, Rajaniemi H. Orcadian periodicitv in salivary carbonic anhydrase VI concentration. Acta Physiol Scand 1995; 154: 205-11.
19 Parkkila S, Parkkila A-K, Vierjokı T, StahlbergT, Rajaniemi H. Competitive time-resolved
immunoflorometric assay for quantifying carbonic anhydrase VI in saliva. ClinChem 1993; 39: 2154-7.
20. Rudney JD. Does variability in salivary protein concentrations influence oral microbial ecology and oral health'? Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1995; 6: 343-67.
21 Russell .11, MacFarlane TW, Aitchison TC, Stephen KW, Burchcll CK. Caries prevalence and microbiologocal and salivary caries activity test in Scottish adolescents! Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1990; 18: 120-25.
22. Tashian RL. The carbonic anhydrascs: Widening perspectives on their evolution, expression and luetion. Rioassays 1989; 10: 186-92.
23 Tashian RF,. Genetics of the mammalian carbonic anhydrases. Adv Genet 1992, 30: 321-56.
24. Watson GH, Davis BA, Raubertas RF, Pearson SK. Bowcn WH. Influence of maternal lead ingestion on carries in rat pups. Nat Med 1997; 3: 1024-5.
3

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com