You are here

Home » Content

FARKLI OTOMATİK BANYO SOLÜSYONLARININ, FARKLI HIZLARD AKİ İNTRAORAL FİLM DENSİTELERÎNE ETKİSİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

DENSITOMETRY EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF VARIOUS AUTOMATIC PROCESSING SOLUTIONS ON THREE INTRAORAL FILMS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2001

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Introduction; The developing procedures and conditions as well as the film structure arc effective on the radiographic image quality. Here our purpose was to evaluate the effects of different automatic developing solutions on three different speed films. Material and Method; For this purpose we used Kodak Ultraspeed D, Ektaspeed and Ektaspeed Plus films and exposed these films using a phantom mandibula.. The films were then developed and fixed in Hacettepe (made in Turkey) and Kodak automatic solutions. Hence densitomelric analysis was done from the various areas with different densities. Results: The base+lor density values were within optima) values for the films developed in Kodak solution. The contrast values for all three types of films were found higher for the Kodak solution than the other developing solution. Conclusion: Results showed that in Kodak films the optimal density was achieved by using Kodak developing solution.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Giriş: Radyogramların görüntü kalitesi üzerinde, filmin yapısı ile birlikte banyo işlemleri ile ilgili koşulların önemli etkileri vardır. Bu araştırmanın amacu üç farklı hızdaki görüntü kalitesi üzerine, farklı marka otamatik banyo solüsyonlarının etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. Gereç vs Yöntem; Bu amaçla dişli bir mandibula kemiğinden Kodak UHraspeed D, EkLaspeed ve Ektaspeed Plus filmler kullanarak elde edilen filmler, ülkemizde üretilen Hacettepe vç ithal edilen Kodak marka otomatik banyo solüsyonlarında banyo edildi. Daha sonra farklı den-site bölgelerinden densitometnk ölçümleri yapıldı. Bulgular: Kodak solüsyonla elde edilen radyogramlarda base+fog dcn&iıe değerleri kabul edilebilir sınırlar içinde bulunmuştur. Kontrast değerlen dc her 3 film grubunda Kodak solüsyonda daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Araştırmamızın sonuçları, farklı hızlardaki Kodak marka filmlerde en uygun görüntü kalitesinin Kodak solüsyonla elde edilebileceğini göstermiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-farkli-otomatik-banyo-solusyonlarinin-farkli-hizlard-aki-intraoral-film-densitelerine-etkisinin-degerlendirilmesi.pdf
  • 1
41-46
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Akdeniz BG, Lomçalı G. Dcnsitometric evaluation of four radiographic processing solutions, Dcntomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27: 102-6.
2. Conover GL, Hildebolt CF, Anthony D. A comparison of six intraoral x-ray films. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 169-172.
3. Farman TT, Farman AG. Evaluation of a new F speed dental x-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and speed films. Dentomaxillofac Radiology 2000; 29: 41-45.
4. Fletcher JC. A comparison of Ektaspeed and Ultraspccd films using manual and automatic processing solutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 19S7; 63: 94-102.
5. Goaz PW, White SC- Oral Radiology Principles and Interrelation. 3 cd CV Mosby, 1994.
6. Hashimoto K, Tbunty KH, Weinberg R. Automatic processing: Effect of temparature and time changes on scnsitomelric properties of Ultra-Speed and Ektaspeed films. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 71:
120-4.
7. Horner K, Rush ton VE, Shearer AC. A laboratory evaluation of Ektaspeed Plus dental x-ray film. J Dent 1995;23: 359-63.
8. Kaffe I, LKlner MM, Kuspel ME. Dcnsitometric evaluation of intraoral x-ray films: Ektaspeed versus Ultraspccd. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984; 57: 33&42r
9. Kaffe 1, Littner MM, Tainse A, Kuspet MH. Densitometry evaluation of three x-ray films with five different developing solutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984; 57: 207-1!.
10. Langland OE, Sippy FH. Textbook of Dental Radiography. Charles C Thomas Publisher. Springfield, Illinios, 1973.
45
Atatürk Üniv.Dış Hck.Fa.k.Derg. Cilt: 1 I, Sayı: 1, Sayfa:41-46,2001
GÖRGÜN
II.]
.udlo
w .IH, Platin E, Densitomeîric comparisons of Ultraspeed, Ektaspeed atıd Ektaspeed plus intraoral films for two processing conditions. Oral Snrt; Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Findtxi 1995;79: 105-H3.
12. Paksoy CS,
Görgü
n S. Farklı hızlardaki üç intraoral filmin densiîesiııe farklı otomatik banyo sürelerinin etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. Selçuk fJniv Diş Hek Fak Dcrg 1999; 9(2): ] 39-144.
13. İVice C. Sensitomctric evaluation of a new E-speed deııtiü radiographic film. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 30-6.
14. Roıınt PüJ, Rogers SN, Chapman M. Rip pin W. A comparison of manual and automatic processing in general dental practice. British Dent J 19%; 181:99-101.
15. Sewerm IP, Base and fog densities of fresh Ektaspeed Plus dental x-ray films. Acta Odonlol Scand 1997; 55: 79-83.
16. Svcnson B, Lindvall AM, Gröndhal I1G. A comparison of a new dental x-ray film, Agfa Geveart Dcntus M4 with Kodak Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed Dental x-ray films. Dentomaxillofac- Radiol 1993; 22: 7-12.
17. Svcnson B, Welander U, Shi XQ, Stainatakis H, 'I'ronje G. A sensitometrie comparison of four denial x-ray filjns and their diagnostic accuracy. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997; 26: 230-35.
18. Thunttiy KK, Weinberg R. Sensitometric comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus, Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed dental films. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral PaLhol Oral Radiol Hndod 1995; 79: 114-6.
19. Thunly KH, Hashimoto K. Weinberg R. Automatic processing: Effect of Lempurature and time changes on the scnsitomelric properties of liaht sensitive films" Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 199!; 72: M 2-8.
20. Wakoh M, Farman AG, Kelly MS. tCurnyaiiagi K. Comparing the sensitometric properties of dental x-ray films. JADA 1995, 126: 341-44.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com