You are here

Home » Content

ÇEŞİTLİ RESTORATİF CAM IONOMER MATERYALLERIN MARJINAL SIRT DAYANIKLILIĞININ DEĞERLENDİRMESI: TÜR IN VITRO ÇALIŞMA

THE EVALUATION OF STRENGTH OF THE MARGINAL Kİ İKİ E OF VARIOUS RESTORATIV L GLASS İONOMER MATERIALS: AN İN VITRO STUDY

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2002

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of This study was in lent of marginal ridge strength of" glass ionomer cements with different structure. Kor thi s reason, e I ah s II cavity was prepared on premolars which sixty-five intact and without restoration and these cavities were rcslorated with metal-reinforced and high viscosity glass ionomer eements. The prepared samples were subjected to resistance test against pressure with cross-head speed 0,5 inch/in in by using Hounsfield Tensometer and the data were recorded in Newton (N). The control group was show the highest, though Medifil Silver group was shown the lowest mean value- The mean values obtained from the other groups were as lolluws fur each material: Argion Molar (160-30,55 N), Medifil IX (161+36.35 N), Fuji IX Capsul (184+36,27 N), Medifil IX Capsul (197+48,32 N) and Kuji IX (224+43,51 N). The data obtained was analyzed with the one-way ANOVA and Duncan multiple range test. There was statistically significant difference between groups (P<0.00l).
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Çalışmamızın amacı, farklı yapıya sahip olan cam-ionomcr simanlarm marjinal sırt dayanıklılığının test edilmesidir. Bu amaçla, 65 adet çiiruksü/. ve restorasyondu/ küçük azı dişi üzerinde sınıf II kav ite hazırlanarak, metal ilaveli (Argion Molar ve Medifil Silver) ve ytlksek visko-ziteli (Mcdılîl IX, Kuji IX, Medifil IX kapsül ve Fuji FX kapsül) restoratif cam ionomer simanlar ile restore edilmiştir. Hazırlanmış örnekler kırıcı uç yardımıyla 0,5 inch' dak'lık başlık hızıyla kuvvet uygulanmış ve değerler Newton (N) cinsinden kaydedilmiştir. En yüksek ortalama değer kontrol grubundan elde edilirken [ANA 2000 (366±82,8Ü N)J, en düşük ortalama değer Medifil Silver (145+30,83 N) grubundan elde edilmiştir. Diğer materyallerden elde edilen ortalama değerler şu şekildedir: Argion Molar (160+30,55 N). Medifil IX (161+36,35 N), Kuji IX Kapsül (184+^6^7 N), Medifil IX Kapsül (197±4832 N) ve Fuji IX (224±43„5I N). KIde edilen değerler,istatistiksel olarak tek yönlü variyarıs analizi ve Duncan çoklu karşılaştırma testi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Gruplar arasındaki farklılık, istatistiksel olarak önemli (P<0,001) bulunmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-cesitli-restoratif-cam-ionomer-materyallerin-marjinal-sirt-dayanikliliginin-degerlendirmesi-tur-vitro-calisma.pdf
  • 3
14-21
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Abolish YF.Y, Torabzadeh H, Fluoride; Release From Toollı-Colored Restorative Materials; A12-Monlh Report. J Can Dent Assoc (.NJCA) 2001 ;64;8:361.
2. Amısavice KJ. Physical Properties of Dental Materials. Iji:Anusaviee KJ ed, Phillips' Sciences Ot" Dental Malerials.lOlh cd. PhiladelpliiaAV.B. Saunders Co. 1996:33-47.3. Braem MJA- Physical Properties of Glass-İonomer Cements: Fatigue and Elasticity. In: Davidson CL, Mjör IA ed. Advances in Glass-Ionomer Ccmcnts.Leipzig:Quintessenec Pub. Co.I999:67-84.
4. Chrislensen GJ. Restoration ûf Pediatric Posterior Teeth. JADA 1996;127:106-108-
5. Chu CH, King NM, Lee AMP, Ym CKY. Wei SHY. A Pilot Study of The Marginal Adaptation and Surface Morphology ûf Glass-Cermet Cements. Oil i rite berten [nl 1996;27:493-50!.
6. Chung KH. The Properties of Metal-Reinforced GUiss-Ionomcr Materials. J Oral Rehab 1993:20:79-87.
7. Covey DA, Ewoldsen NO. Porosity In Manually and Machine Mixed Resin-Modified Glass-lonomcr Cements. Opcr Dent 2001 ;2fi:617-623.
8. Craig RG, Powers JM, Wataha JC. Dental Materials Properties and Manipulation. 7th ed.St Louis:CV Mosby Co. 2000;57-78.
9. Croll TP. Adhesion In Pediatric Dentistry. In: Roulet JF, Degrange M cd. Adhesion The Silent Revolution In Dentistry. LeipzigrQuinf essence Pub. Co. 1999; 173-196.
10. Croll TP, Phillips RW. Glass-Ionomer Silver Cerment Restorations For Primary Teeth. Quintessence Int 1986;17;10:607-614
11. De Soever JA, McCall WD Jr. Holden S, Ash MM Jr. Functional Occlusal Forces: An Investigation bv Telemetry, J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:326-333.
12. Dcnnison JB, Craig RG. Preventive Materials. In: Craig RG, Powers JM ed. Restorative Dental Materials 11 th ed. St Louis: Mosby Co. 2002:199-230.
13. İranken be rger R, Kilmer N, Grof A. Petschelt A. Cyclic Fatigue of Glas-s-Ionomers and Compomers. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1999,54:269-27].
14. Hickel R, M an hart J. Glass-Iunome-Pi and Compomers In Pediatric Dentistry. In: Davidson CL. Mjör IA cd. Advances In Glass-Ionomer Cements. Leip/igiQuintcssence Pub. Co. 1999:201-226¬15. Hotz P, McLean JW, Seed I, Wilson AD. I he
Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Cements To Metal Tooth Substrates. Br Dent J 1977,112:-1! -47.
16. Hung TW, Richardson AS. Clinical Evaluation of Glass-Ionomer Silver Cermet Restorations In I'rimary Molars: One Year Results. JCDA 1990;56:239-240.
17 Kent BE, Wilson AD. A New Translucent Cement For Dentistry The Glass lonoracr Cements. Br Dent J 1972:132:133-135.
18. Kilpatrick NM. Murray .1.1, McCabc JF. The Use of A Reinforced Glass-Ionomer CemenL For The Restoration of" Primary Molars; A Clinical Trial. Br Dent J 1995;179:175-179.
19. Kramer N. Frenken bcrgcr R. Clinical Performance of A Condensable Metal-Reinforced ülass-Eonomer Cement In Primary Molars. Br Dent J 200!;190(6); 317-320.
20. Kramer N, Pclka M, Kaulel/ky P, Simdel .1, Petschhclt A. Wear Resistance of Compomers and Viscous Glass-Ionomer Cements (Abstract in English). Dtsch ZahnartzlZ 1996;52:186-189.
21. Luceficld WR, RemdJ MC, Rctief DH. Tensile Bond Strength of A Giass-Ionomer Cement. J İTosthci. Dent 1985^3:2;194-198.22. Mallow P, Dıırvvard M. Klaipo M. Comparison of Uvu Giass-Ionomcr Cements Using The ART Technique. J Dent Res 1995:74:405.
23. McLean JW. Cermet Cements. JADA 1990; 120:43-47.
24. McLean JW, Gasser O. Glass Cermet Cements, Quintessence Int 1985;5:333-343.
25. Mi Ira SB. Adhesion To Dentin and Physical Properties. .1 Dent Res 1991:70;l:72-74.
26. Mount GJCTinical Placement ûf Modern Glass-Ionomer Cements. Quintessence Int 1993;24:99-107.
27. Nicholson JW. Polyeleetrolyte Restorative Materials, In: Bradcn M, Clarke RL, Nicholson JW, Parker S cd. Polymeric Dental Materials. Verlag Berlin: Springer 1997:1-43.
28. Östhınd J, Möller K, Koch G. Amalgam, Composite Resin and Glass Ionomcr Cement in Class 11 Restorations In Primajy Molars. A Three-Year Clinical Evaluation. Svvcd Dent J 1992:16:81-86,
29. Simmons JJ. The • Miracle Mixture Glass-Ionomer and Alloy Powder. Texas Dent J 1983;1;1:6-13.
30. Smales RJ, Yip UK. The Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) Approach For The Management of Dental Caries. Quintessence Int 2002;33:427-432.
31. Stratmarm RGJ3erg HJ, Donly KJ. Class 11 Glass-Ionomer-Silvcr Restorations In Primary Molars. Quintessence Int 1989;20;l:43-47.
YILMAZ, HHLDİ.Z KO ÇOĞI; LLARI, EY ÜBOĞ LU
32- Summit JB. Howell ML, Bur°css JO, Duttun FB. Osborne JW. Effect of Grooves On Resistance Form of Conservative Class 2 Amalgams. Oper Denl 1992;17:50-56.
33. Weidlich P. Miranda LA. Malız M. Samuel SMW.Fluoride Release and Uptake From Glass-Ionomer Cements and Composite Resin Bra/. Dent J 2000;11:2:89-96.
34. Wdbury RR, Shaw AJ. Murray .7.1, Gordon PI!, McCabe JF, Clinical Evaluation of Paired Comnotner and Glass-Ionomer Restorations In Primary Molars: Final Results After 42 Months. Br Denl J 2000;189:93-97,
35- Williams JA, Billingtnn RW, Pearson GJ. The Comperative Strengths oi Commercial Glass-Ionomer Cements Willi and Without Metal Additions. Br Dent J 1992;172:279-282.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com