You are here

Home » Content

IMPLANT BAŞARISINDA GEOMETRİK TASARIMIN ETKİSİ

THE EFFECT OF GEOMETRICAL DESIGN ON IMPLANT SUCCESS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2003-2004

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The long term success of an implant is dependent an several factors. Various features of all implant types used in current dental practice have different effects on these factors. A special design of an implant can have a positive effect on mechanical stabilization while decreasing homogenous stress elimination potential. Modifications at implant design increase mechanical stability of implant and also would aid to distribute the bite forces to the surrounding bone more homogenously. By the way; long terai crestal resorbtion is decreased to sustain successful esthetical results at anterior region. Up today; ideal implant design has not been introduced yet, however current efforts are given through this direction- This article aims to guide forthcoming studies by evaluating the effects of geometrical implant design.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
İmplantın uzun dönem başarısı bir çok faktöre bağlıdır. Gttnümüz diş hekimliği pratiğinde kullanılan implantların tasarımlan da klinik başarıyı arttırma amacı ile sürekli gelişim göstermektedir. Implant tasarımında yapılan değişikliklerle implantın mekanik atabilizasyonu arttırılırken, implanta geEen yükün kemiğe homojen dağılması sağlanmaktadır. Bu sayede uzun dönem krestal rezDrbsiyon azaltılarak ön bölgede elde edilen başarılı estetik sonuçların kabalığı sağlanmaktadır. Günümüzde her açıdan mükemmel bir implant tasarımına henüz ul aş il amamı ştı; ancak bu yönde önemli adımlar atılmaktadır. Bu makalede implant başarısında geometrik özellikler incelenerek ideal implant tasarımına ulaşmada izlenecek yollara ışjk tutulmaya çalışılmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-implant-basarisinda-geometrik-tasarimin-etkisi.pdf
  • 3-1
48-54
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Bothe RT., Beaton LE., Davenport HA.. Reaction of bone to multiple metalic implants.Su.rg Gynecol Obstet. 1940;71:598-602.
2. GolLlieb S., Leventhat GS..Titanium, a metal tor surgery. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1951; 33:473-474.
3. Branemark 1M., Hanson BO., Adcll R., el al . Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Hxperience from a 10- year period. Stand. J. PlasL Reconst.Surg. 1977: 111: 1-132.
4. Moms HF., Manz MC, Tarolli JH. Si]ccess of muliple endosseous dental implant designs to second-stage surgery across study sites. J. Oral Maxiliolat;. Surg. 1997; 555; 76-82.
5. Albrektsson T.. Hrenemark P-L, Hanson HA., Lin strom J. üs seointe grated titanium implants : Rqmrcmenls for enjurmg a long-lasting direct bnm>to-implant anchorage in man.Acta OiLhop Scand 1985 ,52: 155-170.
6- Hara Id son T. A photodastic study ol" some biomechanical factors affecting the anchorage ol osseointegrated implants in the jaw. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1980; 14: 209-214.
7. Quirynen M.T Naert I., van Steenberghe D.Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brcncmark system. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 1992; 6: 238-245.
52
Atatürk Üniv.Diş Hek.Fak.Derg.
(Cilt: 13, Sayı:3, Cilt; 14, Sayı 1), Sayfa:48-54,2003-2004
ŞENER, GÖNÜL, ARSLAN, SALİH
S Trnhlar RS
, Morris HR, Orhi S. Implant surface coating and bone quality-related outcomes through 36 months post-placement of root-form endosseous dental implants. Ann Periodontal. 2000; 5: 109-118.
9. Morris HR, Ochi S., Spray JR., et al. Periodontal-type measures associated with hydroxyapatitc-coatcd and non-coated implants: Uncovering to 36 months.Ann Periodontal. 2000; 5: 56-67.
10. Lambert PM., Morris HF., Ochi S. Positive effect of surgical experience with implants on second-stage implant survival. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. !997;55: 12-18.
11. Dent CD,, Olson JW., Farish SE„ ct al. The influence of preoperative antibiotics on success of endosseous implants up to and including stage II surgery: A study of 2,641 patients. J Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1997; 55: 19-24.
12. Lambert PM., Morris HF., Ochi S. The influence of 0.12% chlorhex îdine digluconate rinses on the incidence of infectious complications and implant success. J- Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1997; 555; 25-30,
13. Bidez MW. The threshold of micro-motion conductive to bone ingrowth. Int. J. Oral Implantol. 1991; & 113-115.
14. Orestein IH„ Tamow DR, Morris HF. et al. Three-year post-placement survival of implants mobile at placement. Ann Periodontal. 2000; 5: 32-41.
15. Morris HF., Lambert PM., Ochi S. The influence of tobacco use on endosseous implant failures.Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. North Am. 1998; 10: 255-274.
16. Lambert PM., Morris HF., Ochi S.The influence of smoking on 3-year clinical success of osseointegrated dental implants. Ann Periodontal. 2000; 5: 79-89.
17. Manz MCRadiographic asscstment of peri-implant vertical bone loss: D1CRG implant report no. 9. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1997; 55: 62- 71.
18. Mani MC Factors associated with radiographic vertical bone loss around implants placed in a clinical study. Ann Periodontal. 2000; 5: 137-151.
19. Ericsson RA.,Albrektsson T. The effectof heat in bone regenaration. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1984; 42: 705-711.
20. Browne M., Gregson PJ. Effect of mechanical surface pretreatment on metal ion release. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 385-92.
21. Ungersbock A., Pohler OEM., Pcrren SM.Evaluation of soft tissue reactions at the interface titanium limited contact dynamic compression plate implant with different surface treatments: an experimental sheep study. Biomalenals 1996; 17: 797-806.
22. Zcng H„ Chittur KK,T Lacefield WR. Dissolution/reprecipitation of calcium phosphate thin films produced by ion beam sputter deposition technique. Biomaterials 1999;20:443-51.
23. Hayakawa T., Yoshinari M., Nemüto K.., Wotke JGC, Jansen Ja. Effect of surface roughness and calcium phosphac coating on the implant/bone response. Clin. Oral Implant Res. 2000; 11: 296-304.
24. Truhlar RS., Orcnstein IH.> Moms HF., et al. Distribution of bone qualit in patients receiving endosseous dental implants. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1997; 55; 38-45.
25. Truhlar RS., Fansh SE., Scheitler LE., et al. Bone quality and implant design related outcomes through stage II surgical uncovering of Spectra-System root form implants. J, Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1997; 55: 46-54.
26. Lekholm U„ Zarb GA, Patient selection and preperalion. In: Brencmark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T,, eds. Tissue Integrated Prostheses: Osscointegralion in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985: 199-209S.
27. Adell R.T Lekholm U., Rockier B„ et al. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int. J. Oral. Surg. 1981; 10: 381^16.
28. Jaffin RA,Berman CL. The excessive luaj of Brenemark implants in Type IV bone: A 5-year analysis. J. Periodontal. 1991; 62: 2-4.
53
Atatürk ÜmvDIş Hek.h'ak.Derg.
(Cilt; 13, Sayı:3, Cilt: 14, Sayı 1), Sayfa:48-54.2003-2004
ŞENER, GÖNÜL, ARSI.AN, SALİH
29. Morris HF.,Ochi S,, Winkler S- Implant survival in patients with type II diabetes Placement to 36 months. Ann. Periodontal. 2000; 5; 157-165.
30. Joel L. Rosentliehl, DMD . SwissPlus Implant System, Part 1: Surgical Aspects and Iritersystem Comparisons . Implant Dent. 2002; 11: 144-153.
31. Laurent Pierrisnard, et al. Two Dental implants Designed for Immediate l_aading: A Finite Element Analysis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Imp. 2002; 17: 353-362.
32. Clift SE, Fisher J, Watson CJ. Stress and strain distribution in the bone surrounding a new design of dental implant: a comparison with a threaded Branemart type implant Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. (H). 1993; 207(3); 133-8.
33. Kido H, Schulz EE, Kumar A.Lozada J, Saha S. Implant diameter and bone density: effect on initial stability and pull out resistance..!. Oral implantol. 1997; 23(4): 163-9.
34. Jarvis WC. Biomcchanical advantages ol wide-diameter implants.
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1997 Jul; 18(7):687-92, 694; quiz 696.
35. Carr AB, Bcals DW, l^arsen PE. Reverse-torque failure of screw-shaped implants in baboons after 6 months of he üling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997 Sup-Oct;l2(5):598-603.
36. Morris HF, Ochi S. Survival and stability (PTVs) of six implant designs from placement to 36 months. Ann Periodonlol. 2000 Dcc;5( i): 15-21.
37. Carr AB, Ocrard DA, Larsen PE. Histomorphometric analysis of implant anchorage
for 3 types of dental implants following 6 months of healing in baboon jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Nov-Dcc;] 5(6):785-91
38. Rasmusson U Kahnbcrg KE, Tan A.Effects of implant design and surface on bone regeneration and implant stability: an experimental study in the dog mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2001 ;3(l):2-8
39. Sqmer RS, Psoter W.I, Taylor TD. Removal torques of conical, tapered implant abutments: the effects of anodi^alion and reduction of surface area. Int J Oral MaxUlofac Implants, 2002 Jan-Feb;17(l):24-7.
40. Tawil G, Mawla M, Gottlovv J. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the 5-mm diameter regular-platform Branemark fixture: 2- to 5-year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2002;4( 1); 16-26,
41. Wohrle PS. Nobel Perfect esthetic scalloped implant: rationale for a new design. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2O03;5 Suppl 1:64-73.
42. Schmid MR, Schicl HJ, Lambrccht JT. Torque of endosseous dental screw type implants| Sehweiz MonatsschrZahnmed. 2002;1 I2(8):804-13.
43. McCracken M, Lemons JE, Jeffcoat M, Kolh DL, Fritz MEIlistomorphologiçal evaluation of loaded plate-form and root-form implants in Maçaca mulatta monkeys, Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Apr;13(2):2l4-20.
44. Abbou M. Primary stability and osseointcgratioiv. preliminary clinical results with a tapered diminishing-thread implant, Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2003 Mar:15(2): 161-8; qui/. 170.
45. Tada S, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura fi, Miyafcawa O, Kusakari H, Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dmiensional finite clement analysis. İni J Oral Maxillolac Implants. 2003 May-Jun;18(3):357-68.
46.
Gira
y B, Şener BC, Taşar F. Oral implantolojide kemik morfolojisi ve ilişkili metabolik hastalıkların önemi. Oral Imp]antoloji Dergisi 83-90,Nisan 1995.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com