You are here

Home » Content

OKLUZAL ÇÜRÜKLERİN TEŞHİSİNDE YENİ BİR YÖNTEM: DIAGNOdent

NEW METHOD ON DIAGNOSIS OF OCCLUSAL CAKIES: DIAGNOdent

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2003

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
One of the inost serious problems in the protective and modem conservative treatment is the early diagnosis of" the caries. The KaVo DIAGNOdent is a new method that has been developed in order to eliminate or minimize ibis problem. The KaVo DIAGNOdent is a rclalively new diagnostic instrument that generate;; laser light with a wavelength of (05 nm. The device consists of a probe, <i fibre-optic lead and a unit containing the electronics and the laser diode: and it operates with battery. The KaVo EHAGNOdcnl makes it possible to recognize successfully the pathological changes, initial lesions and deminerali/alion of enamel which arc difficult or even impassible to delect.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Koruyucu vc modern konseıvatıf tedavi fıçısından karşılaşılan en önemli problemlerden birisi erken çürük teşhisidir. Bu problemi ortadan kaldırmak veya minimale indirmek için geliştirilen yöntemlerden birisi yeni Laser Floresans Sistem (KaVo DIAGN~Qdent)'dir. KaVo DIAGNOdent 655tım dalga boyuna sahip lazer ışığj üreten ymi bir dLagnostik aygıttır Aygıt esas olarak bir prob, bir i'iber optik kablo, laser di od ve elektronikleri içeren bir ünıllen ibarettir vc pil ile çalışır. Bu sistem sayesinde tanımlanması zor. hatta imkansız olan buşlaııgıv lezyonlnrı, dcınınerah>.asyün sahaları, dişin minesini etkileyen değişiklikler erken safhada oldukça başanİ! bir şekilde tanımlanabilir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-okluzal-curuklerin-teshisinde-yeni-bir-yontem-diagnodent.pdf
  • 1
67-71
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Lussi A. Validity of diagnostic and treatment decisions of fissure caries. Caries Res 1991; 25: 296-303.
2. A LLri 11 DC, Ashley PF. Occlusal canes detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNGdent with conventional methods. Br Dent J 2001; 190: 440-3
3. T ruin G.T, vanft Hoi' MA, Kalsbcck 11, Frencken JE, König KG. Secular trends of caries prevalence in 6- and 12-year-old Dutch children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993; 21: 249-52.
4. Mejarc I, Kallestal C, Stenlnnd H. Johansson II. Caries development from 1 I to 22 rears of age: A prospective radiographic study. Prevalence and distribution. Canes Res 1998; 32: 10-6.
5- Dodds MWJ. Dental caries diagnosis toward the 21 st century- Nature Medicine 1996; 2: 83.
6. van Drop CS, Exlerkate RA: ten Cale JM. The effect of dental probing on subsequent enamel deminerali/.alion. ASDC J Dent Child 19SS; 55: 343-7.
7. Ekstrand K, Qvist V, Thylstmp A. Light microscope study of the effect, of probing in occlusal surfaces. Caries Res 1987; 21: 368-74.
y. KaVo DIAGNOdcnt-88396 UİBHRACi 1 clinical guidelines (H! kitapçığı).
9 Saw!t; RK Arsdlaw RJ. Has occlusal caries become more difficult to diagnose? -;. sLady comparing clinically undetected lesions in mc.iar teeth of 14-f6-ycar old children in 1974 and 1982. Br Dent J 1988; 164: 209-11.
Î0.
Wcnzc
l A, Larsen MJ, Fcjerskov O. Detection of occlusal caries without cavitation by visual inspection, film radiographs. xeroradiographs. and digitized radiographs. Caries Res 1991; 25: 365-71.
1 I. Lussi A- Comparison of different methods for the diagnosis of fissure caries without cavitation. Caries Res 1993;27:409-16.
12. Lussi A. Impact of incindirip or excluding cavitatcd lesions when evaluating method? for the diagnosis of occlusal caries. Caries Res i.996; 30:389-93.
13. Fcrreira Zandona AG, Analoiıi M, Bciswanger BB, Isaacs RL. Kalrawy AH, Eckcrt GJ Ki AL. An in vitro comparison between laser fluorescence and visual examination for detection of dcmineralization in occlusal pits and fissures. Caries Res 1998; 32: 210-8¬14. Hibsl R, Paulus R. Caries detection by red
excited fluorescence investigations on fluorophores. Caries Res 1999; .13: 295.
7 0
Atatürk Ü11İV.Dİ5 Hek.Fak.Derg. Cilt: I 3, Sayı:l, Sayfa:07-7!, 2003
A KG ÜT.,, ÖZDABAK
15, Hibst R, Pauhıs R. Molecular basis ol red excited caries fluorescence Caries Res 200O;34: 32.1.
16, Lussi A, Metren B, Loııgbotionı C, Reich E, Francescut P. Clinical pcıformunce of a laser fluorescence device tür detection ol" occlusal caries lestoııs. Kur .1 Oral Scı 2001; 109; 14-19.
17, Et-Housseirıy AA. Jamjoum H. Evaluation of visual, explorer, and a laser device for detection of early occlusal caries. J Clin Pcdiatr Dent 2001, 26; 41-48,
IS. Shi XO, Tranaeus S, Angmar-Manssoit B. Comparison of QLF and DIAGNOdent for quantification of smooth surface caries. Caries Res 2001; 35: 21 -6.
19. Shi XO, Tranaeus S, Angmar-Mansson B. Validation of DIAGNOdent for quantification of smcoth-suifacc canes: an in vitro study. Atla Oduntoi .Scand2fX)l;59:74-8.
20, Lussi A. Tmwinkelried S, Pitts NB. Lotıgpottom C, lieıch E. Performance imd a reproducibility of a laser fluorcscncc system for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries; Res 1999; 33: 261-6,
21. Shi XO. Wclandcr U, Angrrtar-Maiissoti B. Occlusal canes detection with Kavo DIAGNOdent and radiography: an in vitro comparison. Caries Res 2000; 34: 151-8.
22. Tam LE, McComb Ü. Diagnosis of occlusal caries: Pari Î1 Recent diagnostic technologies. J Can Dent Assoc 2001; 67: 459-63.
23. John DB. Caries detection and prevention with laser energy. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 955-69.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com