i- Akdeniz BG. tindosseöi fnıpbrHlarda Seçıbn bölgenin Fİ veriş] iliği ııiıı Panoramik Radyografi ve Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Kullanımı ile Kaülatif ve Kantitalif Olarak K&YÎISI mimli Değerlendirilmesi. Doktora Tezi, İzmir ! 995
2-
Branemar
k P-T, Zarh G, Albrektsson T. Tiüsue-Intcgrrtiçd Prosthe^. Osscoinlegıalion in Clinical Demistry. Chicago: Quintessence. 1985.
3-
Dağislnj
i S. Sağlıklı vc osleoporozlu bireylerde mandibular kemiğin kal i tatil' değerlendirilmesinde PMT, kortikal kemik yüksekliği ve yoğunluğunmc tamsa] güvenilirliği. Doktora te/.i. Krzurum, 2002
4- (îher ME, Richardson AC. The accuracy of denLal radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement. Inl J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1995 Ju£i;l5(3):268-83.
5- Gray CF, Rcdpath TW, Smith PW, Staff RT. Advanced imaging: Magnetic resonance imaging in implanL dcnli.stry. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 14,2003, 18-27
6- Hanng Jl, Jansen L. Dental Radiography Principles and Techniques. 2nd. Udi t ion. W.B. Saunders Company 2000.
7- Haris D, Buscr D, Dula K, Grondahl K.. F..A.O. {.kfidelines for the use of Diagnostic; Imaging in Implant Dentistry. Clin. Oral Impl Res. 13, 2002,566-570
8-
Harorl
ı A, Yılmıı/. AB. Akgül HM. Dişhekimliğjnde Radyolojide Temel Kavramlar ve Radyodiagnos-tik. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ofset Tesisleri h^urum 2001
9- 1 Iıgudıi KW: Orhodorılıe Application ol" Osseointegrated Implants. Quintessence Publishing CoJnc. Illinois. 2000.
68
Atatürk Üniv.Diş llek.Fak.Dcrg. Cilt: 14, Sayj 3, Sayfa: 58-69 ,2004
10- Ito K, Gonıi Y, Sato S, Araı Y, Shinoda K. Clinical application of a ne»v compact CT system to assess 3-D images tor the preoperative treatment planning of implants in the posterior mandible. Acasc report. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 12,2001,539-542
11- Lofıhag-Hanscn S, Lindh C and Peterson A. Radiographic assessment of the marginal bone level after implant treatment a comparison of periapical and Scanora detailed narrow beam radiography. Dcntomaxillofaciai Radiology ( 2003)32,97-103
12- Mason R, Boume S, A Guide to Dental Radiography. Oxford University Pres.Oxford 1998.
13- Miseli CE, Contemporary Implant Dentistry. Mosby, St .Louis, 1993.
14- Morner AC, Gumlla S, Lars 1, Andersson G, Welander U. Comparison or the diagnostic potential of dirceL digital and conventional intraoral radiography in the evaluation of pen-implant conditions. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 14 (6) 714, 20O3
15- Razmus TF, Williamson GK Current Oral and Maxillofacial Imaging. W.B.Saunders Company. Philadelphia 1996
lfi- Rcddy MS, Mayfteld-Donahoo T, Vandervcn FJ, Jcffcoat MK. A comparison of the: diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1,994 Dec;5(4): 229-38
17- Roberts W H. The use of dental implanEs in orthodontic therapy. The Biological Mechanisms of Tooth Eruption, Resorption and Replacement by Implants.Boston: Harvard Society for the Advancement of Orthodontics, 1994:631-642.
DAĞISTAN, ÇAKUR, tIARORLI
18- Scribano E, Ascenti 0, Mazziotti S, Blandino A, Racchmsa S,Gualniera F. Computed tomography in dental implantoiogy: medico legal implications. Radio] Med { Torino ) 2003 Jan-F'eb ; 105 ( 1 2) : 92-9
19- Smet H De, Jacobs R, GijbeLs F and Neart I. The accuracy and reliability of radyografhic methods for the assessment of marginal bone ievel around oral implants. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology ( 2002 ) 31, 176-181
20-
Tuğse
l Z, Giirdal l\ Özmcn B, Altınbulak H, Oksan T. implant uygulaması öncesi kemiğin kalitatif değerlendirilmesinde PMI güvenilirliği ön çalışma- .Ege Dışhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 1994,15,102-106
21-
'
İ tinalı B. Mıılti-Disipüner Bir Yaklaşımla Oral İmplantoloji'ye Giriş. İstanbul 1996.
22- Verhoevçn JW, Cune MS. Radiographic planning and the evaluation of implant treatment Ned Ti.jdschrTandhedkd.2003 Mar;110(3):l 13-9.
23- White SC, I'haroah M.f. Oral Radiology Principles and Interpretation. Fourth Edition Mosby, S!.Louis 2000
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
