GEÇMİŞTEN GÜNÜMÜZE DENTİN BONDING AJANLAR

1
. Bııonocore M. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J DcnL Res 1955: 34:849-853.
2. Munksgaard EC, Iric M, Asnuıssen E., Dentin-polvnier bond promoted by Ghurta and various resins, J Dent Res 1985;64: 1409-11.
3. Perdiago .1, Swift R J, Denchcy G E, Wcfcl .1 S , Donly K J- In vitro bond strength and SEM evaluation of dentin bonding systems to different dentin .substrates. ,1 Den! Res 1994;73:44-55-
4. Swift E .1. Perdigao J. Heymann H. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art. Quintessence lot 1995; 26:95-110.
5. Pashley E T-, Comer R W, Simpson M. D, Hornier J A Pashley D H Caughniiui W F. Dentin Permeability: Scaling the dentin in crown preparations. Opcr Dent 1992; 17:13-20.
6. Bertolotti \< E. Conditioning of the dentin substrate. Opcr Dent 1992; 5:50-61.
7. Asmussen E> Uno S. Adhesion of restorative resins to dentin: chemical and physicochemical aspects. Opcr Dent 1992;5:68-74.
8. Hick J D. Robinson S J , Byericy 'I' S . Chnppelow C C, Adhesive and non shrinking dental resins of (he future. Quintessence In t 1993; 24:632-40.
9. Stanley H R. Pulpal consideration of adhesive materials. OperDcnl 1992;5:151-64
10. Tam L Ev Pillar H M. Fracture toughness of den Lin/ re si n composite adhesive interfaces. J Dent Res 1993;72:953-9.
11. Pashley DII, Livingstone MJ, Grccnhill JD. Regional resistances to fluid flow in human dentin in vitro Arch Oral Biol 1978:23:807-10.
12. Pashley D 11 , Ciuechi B . Sano H . Horner J A. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence hit 1993; 24:618-31.
75
Atatürk Üniv.Diş Hek.Fak.Derg. Cilt 14. Sayı 3. Sayfa:7Q-78, 2004
ZORBA, BAYINDIR, YILDIZ
13. Pashley D M, Carvalhû R M. Dentine permeability and demin adhesion. J DeııL. 1972: 25: 355-72.
14. Sano H, Shono T, i'akatsu T, Hosoda H. Micropores dentin zone beneath resin-imprcgnated layer. OperDent 1994; 19:59-64.
15. Perinka L , Sano II , Hosoda H. Dcjitin thickness . hardness and Ca, concentration vs bond strength of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1992; 8:229-33.
16. O' Brien \VJ. Dental materials: properties and selection. Quintessence Publishing Co Chicago, 1989.
17. Causton BE, Johnson KW. Improvement of polyearboxylatc adhesion to dentine by the use of a new calcifying solution. An in vitro study Br Dent J. 1982; 5, 152:9 .1 I.
18. Alters HF. Tooth Colored restoratives: Principles and techniques 9th ed. Alto Boks Santa Rosa California 2002. chapter 8
19. Şano H, Takatsu T. Ciııcchı B. Horner JA, MaLLheu-'s WG, Pashley DH. Nanoleakage: Leakage within the hybrid layer, Oper Dent 1995; 20:1 8-24.
20. Nakabavashi N, Kojimn K. Masuhara H. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth states, J Biomed Mat Res 1982: 16:265-73.
21. Hinde» G. Clinical relevance of the formulation and dentin bonding systems. J Dent 1994; 22:73-81.
22 Prati C. Pahkv DH. Dentin wetness, permeability and thickness and bond strength of adhesive systems. Am J Dent 1992:5:33-8.
23. Ruyter IE. The Chemistery of adhesive agents. Oper Dent 1992; 5:32-43,
24. ViiiiMecrbeck B. Lambrechts P, Irtokosln S, Bracm M. Vanherle G. Factors affecting adhesion to mineralized tissues. Oper Dent 1992; 5:1 I 1-24.
25. Van der Vyver PJ. De Wet PA I he current state of denlin bonding systems: A review of materials and techniques SAD.I 2000;55;475-84.
26. Pashley DH, Livingstone MJ, Grecnhill JD. Regional resistances to fluid How in human dentin in vitro ArehOrai Biol 1978;23:807-E0.
27. Paul 8.1, Scharer P. Factors in dentin bonding. Part 1: A review of the morphology and physiology of human dentin. J Esthet Dent 1993,5:5-8.
28. Bayne SC, Hey matin HO, Wilder Ad & Sturdcvani JR. Class V angulation , size and depth effects on composite retention. J Dent Res 1992; 71:314. Abstr 1669
29. Ziemiccki TLt Dennison JB, Charbeneau GT. Clinical evaluation of cervical composite resin restorations placed without retention. Opcr DenL. 1987; 12:27-33.
3Ü.
Gripp
o JO, Ması JV. Role of hiodental engineering factors (BF,F) in the etiology of root caries. J Esthet Dent 1991;3:71-6.
31. Lee WC. Eaklc WS Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. J Prnsihct Dent 1984: 52:374-80.
32. Thresher RW, Saito GL. The stress analysis of human teeth. .1 Biomech. 1973; 6:443-49.
33. Selna LG, Shillingburg HT Jr. Kerr PA. Finite element analysis of dental structures—ax i symmetric and plane stress idealizations. Riomed Mater Res. 1975;9:237-52
34. Yertram AL, Wright KW, Piekard HM. Finite element stress analysis of the crowns of normal and restored teeth. J Dent Res. 1976: 55:1004-11.
35. j leyinann HO, Sturdcvani JR, Bayne S. Wilder AD, Sİ Lider TB, Brunson WD Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: a two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc J99L 122:41-7.
36. Kanca J 3rd. A method for bonding to Tooth structure using phosphoric acid as a dentin enamel elchant. Quintessence Int 1991;122:285-90
37. Hcymann HO. Bayne SC CuiTent concepts in dentin bunding: focusing on dentinal adhesion factors. J Am Dent Assoc 1993: 124:26-36.
76
Atatürk Üniv.Diş Hek.Fak.Dcrg. Glt:14,Sayı3, Sayfa:70-78,2004
38. Craig R G, Restorative dental materials. 12th Kd. MosViy Co. Missouri St. Louis, 2002 p: 259-280
39 Aschhcim KW, Dale BG. Esthetic Dentistry, a clinical approach to techniques and materials. 2.nd ed., Philadelphia, Mosby, 2001:247-249.
40. Buonocore M, Wilcman W, Brudcvold F. A report on a resin composition capable of bonding to human dentin surfaces. J Dent Res 1956. 35:846-51
41. Bowen RL. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues II. Bonding to dentin promoted by surface-active coinonomer. .1 Dent Res 1965; 44: 895-902.
42. American Dental Association Council on dental materials. Instruments and equipment. Dentin bonding systems: an update. J ADA 1987; 114; 91-5.
43. Can s ten BE Improved bonding of composite restorative to dentin. Br Dent J 1984; 156:93-5.
44. Kliadcs GC, Caputo AA & VougioukLasis G.f Composition '•vetting properties and bond strength with dentin of 6 new dentin adhesives. Dental Materials 1985;
1:170-6.
45r Chan DCN, Rcinhart JW & Boyer DB Comport resin compatibility and bonding longevity of a dentin bonding system. Journal of Dental Research 1985; 64:1402-f.
46. Davidson CL & DeGee AJ, Relocation of poJimenaalion contraction stres by How in dental composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63:146-148.
47. Swift KJ Jr. Perdigao J, Hcymami HO, Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and slate of the art. Quintessence Int. 1995; 26:95-110.
48. Nakabayashi N. Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Tokyo: Quintessence; 1998. pc 57-63
49. I'ao L; Pashley DH, Boyd L. The effect of different types of smear layers on dentin and and enamel bond strength?- Dent Mater 1988;4;208,16;
50. Fusayama T, Nakamura M . Kurosaki N , Iwaku M- Non-presure adhesion of new adhesive restorative resin. J Dent Res 1979; 58; 1364-72.
ZORBA,BAYINDIR, YILDIZ
51. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara h. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth states. J Biomed Mat Res 1982; 16:265-73.
52. Kanca J. A method for bonding to tooth structure using phosphoric acid as a dentin enamel conditioner. Quintessence Int. 1991; 22:285-90.
53. Gwinnet AJ. Quantitative contribution of resin Infiltration/hybridization to dentin bonding- Am J Dent 1993;6:7-9.
54. Kanca J. Wet bunding: effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent 1996:9, 273-6.
GoHov F- Bonding Mechanism or three • onc-bottlc systems to conditioned and unconditioned enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1997:10:224-30,
56. lay FR , Gwinnet AJV Wei SHY. Structural evidence of a sealed tissue interface with total etch wet-bonding tecnique, invivo. J Dent Res 1994:73:629-36¬57. Mason PN, Calabrase M, Graif L. Modified extrusion shear bond strength of the new 3M adhesive. J Dent Res 1998; 77:123-9.
58. Watanabe 1, Nakabayashi N. Bonding durability of photocured Phcnyl-P in TEGDMA to smear layerTJ retained bovine dentin. Quintessence Int 1993; 24:335^f2.
59. Ferrari M> Mannocci F, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Effect of two etching times on the scaling ability of Oearfl Liner Bond 2 in Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1997:10:66-70.
60. Toida Kr Watanabe A, Nakabayshi N. Effect of smear layer on bonding to dentin prepared with bur, J Jpn
Dent Mater; 1995;14:109-16.
61. YoshimaM.SanoILCarvalhoRJvl^^shlcy DH.
Adhesive mechanism of self-etching/self-pnming adhesive resin to enamel and dentin. J HardTissBiol 1996;5:31-5
62. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF.Tyas MJ, Carpenter j. Field-emission scannning electron microsopy of resin dentin interface morphology of seven dentin adhesive systems J-Adhcsive Dent 2000; 2:259-69.
77
Atatürk Üniv.Diş lick. Fak. Derıj. Cilt: 14, Sayı 3, Sayfa:70-78, 2004
ZORBA, BAYINDIR, YILDIZ
63. Lı HI1, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanolcakagc of cervical restorations of four dentin bonding systems. J. Adhesive Dent 2000; 57-66.
64. Schumacher OE, Antonucci JM. Bcmict PS, Code Jfi. N-Phenylamtnodiflccctic acid as an etchaiit/primer for dentin bonding. .1 Den! Res 1997; 76:602-9.
65. Dunn JR. iBond: The seventh generation, Ojıc-boltlc demin bonding agent. J Contcrip CoiiLin Educ Dent 2003;24:14-18.
66. hinder WF, Tarn C, Effect o! relative humidity on bond strength of self etching adhesives to dentin, J Adhes Dent 2002,4:277-82.
67. Tani C, Finger JW. Fifed of smear layer thickness on bond strength mediated by three All-in-One idf-etchiiig primin" adhesives J Adhcs Dent. 2002; 4:283-9.
68. Soma K. T aim Y, Matsumura H, AlsQta M. Hl i cet of desensitizers on bond ^trenyht of adltesiveluting aymts to dentin. J Oral Rchabil 2001;49:1122-8.
69. Farah JW. Self-etching bonding agents. The Dental Advisor 2003; 20(8):2-4.
70. Oliveira SSA, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall Jr. GW. The mlluence of dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch sy.slem. Dent Mater 2003; 19:758-67.
71. Abo T, Uno S. Ssno H. Compansion of bonding efficiacy of an all-in-one adhesive with a -self-etching primer system. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112:28.