You are here

Home » Content

COMPARISON OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TWO LOCAL ANESTHETICS IN THE CONTROL OF PAIN AFTER MOLAR REMOVAL

MOLAR Dİ Ş ÇEKİMİNİ TAKİBEN AĞRI KONTROLÜNDE İKİ LOKAL ANESTEZİĞİN ETKİNLİĞİNİN VE GÜVENİLİRLİĞİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Using local anesthetics to control a patient's pain is one of the most important factors for successful dental treatment. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of prilocain (Cttanesf1) with octapressnn and articain HCL (Uttracann DS-Fortd1) with ephinephrine HCL in the control of pain after molar removal. There were statisticalty significant differences between pri/ocain HCL and articain HCL on therr ability to control the postoperative pain in only 4th hour. In addition, no serious adverse events related to the articain or prllocain were shown. According to the results, it can be concluded that both anesthetics solutions showed not only similar effects but also they could be safely used for the control of postoperative pain.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Lokal anestezkkler kulaanarak hastanın ağrısının kontrol altına alınması, başaralı dental tedavinin en önemli faktörlerinden biridir. Çalışmamızın amacı, octapressnn içeren Prllocain (Cttanesf) ile epinephrine HCL içeren Articain HCL (Uttracann DS-ForteR)ün molar diş çekimi takibinde gelişen ağrının kontroüüü üüzernne o/an etkilerini ve bu iki ajanın güveniliriiğini karşı/aştırmaktı. Post-operatff ağrı kontrolleri açısından yannz 4. saatte istatistiksel olarak anlam/ı bir fark gözlendi. Ayrıca, Articain HCL veya Pri/ocain ile ilgili ciddi brr ters etki gözlenmedi. Bu çahşmanın sonuçlarına dayanarak, postoperatif ağrı kontrolünde her iki anestezik solüsyonun sadece benzer şekilde brr etkiye sahip olmadıklarını aynı zamanda güveni oaarak kul/anılabileceklerini de düşünmekteyiz.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-comparison-efficacy-and-safety-two-local-anesthetics-control-pain-after-molar-removal.pdf
  • 2
22-25
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Costa
CG,
Tortamano IP,Rocha RG, Francischone
CE, Tortamano Nico/au.
Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration. Quintessence Int. 2005 Mar; 36(3):197-201.
2. Allman KG, McFadyen JG, Armstrong J, Sturrock
GD, Wilson IH. Comparison of articaine and bupivacaine/lidocaine for single medial canthus peribulbar anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2001 Oct; 87(4):584-7.
3. Uckan S, Gu/er N, Sumer M, Ungor M. Local anesthetic efficacy for oral surgery: Comparison of diphenhydramine and pr/locaine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998 Ju; 86(1): 26-30.
4. Ma/amed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. Efficacy of
articaine: A new amid local anesthetic. JADA. 2000:131; 635-642.
5. Oertei R, Rahn R and Kirch W. Ciinicai pharmacokinetics of articaine. Cinn Pharmacokinet. 1997Dec; 33(6):417-25. Review.
6. Metaxotos NG, Asplund O, and Hayes M. The
efficacy of bupivacaine with adrenainne in reducing pain and bleeding associated with breast reduction: a prospective trial. The British of Plastic Surgery. 1999:52; 290-293.
7. Jensen OT, Upton LG, Hayward JR, Sweet RB.
Advantages of long-acting local anesthesia using etidocaine hydrochloride. J Oral Surg. 1981 May; 39(5)350-3.
8. Tuffnn JR, Cunifffe DR, Begg R, Shaw SR. Does
bupivacaine irrigation of third molar sockets reduce postoperative pain? A double binnd controlled trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990 Apr; 28(2):96-8.
9. Lasknn JL. Use of etidocaine hydrochloride in oral
surgery: a ciinicai study. J Oral Surg. 1978 Nov; 36(11)863-5.
10. Meechan JG, Baarr GS The effect of two different local anaesthetic solutions on pain experience following apicectomy. Br Dent J. 1993 Dec 11-25; 175(11-12):410-3.
11. Lasknn JL, Wallace WR, DeLeo B Use of bupivacaine hydrochloride in oral surgery-a ciinicai study. J Oral Surg. 1977Jan; 35(1):25-9.
24
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
Cilt: 16, Sayı: 2, Yıl: 2006, Sayfa: 22-25
ŞİMŞEK KAYA, BÜYÜKKURT, DAYI
12. Nespeca JA Ciinicai trials wtth bupivacaine in oral surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1976 Sep; 42(3):301-7.
13. Pricco DF. An evaluation of bupivacaine for regional nerve block in oral surgery. J Oral Surg. 1977Feb; 35(2):126-9.
14. Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. A comparison between articaine HCl and lidocaine HCI in pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug; 22(4):307-11.
15. Donaldson D, James-Perdok L, Cragg BJ, Derkson GD, Richardson AS. A comparison of Ultracaine DS (articaine HC)) and Cttanest forte (prilocaine HCl) in maxi/aary infiltration and mandbuaar nerve block. J Can Dent Assoc. 1987Jan;53(1):38-42.
16. Haas DA, Harper DG, Saso MA, Young ER. Lack of differential effect by Ultracaine (articaine) and Cttanest (prilocaine) in infiltration anaesthesia. J Can Dent Assoc. 1991 Mar; 57(3):217-23. 2.
17. Chapman PJ. A controlled comparison of effectiveness of bupivacaine for post-operative pain control. Aust Dent J. 1988 Aug; 33(4):288-90.
18. Seymour RA, Baarr GS, Wyatt FA. Post-operative dental pain and analgesic efficacy. Part I. Br J Oral Surg. 1983 Dec;21(4):290-7.
19. Seymour RA, Meechan JG, Baarr GS. An investigation into post-operative pain after third molar surgery under local analgesia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985 Dec; 23(6):410-8.
20. Rodrigo MR, Comfort MB, Lee KM. Preoperative dfflunisal for pain relief following third molar surgery under general anaesthesia. Aust Dent J. 1993Apr; 38(2):125-30.
21. Comfort MB, Tse AS, Tsang AC, McGrath C. A study of the comparative efficacy of three common analgesics in the control of pain after third molar surgery under local anaesthesia. Aust Dent J. 2002 Dec; 47(4):327-30.
22. Averbuch M, Katzper M. Severity of baseline pain and degree of analgesia in the thrrd moaar post-extraction dental pain model. Anesth Analg. 2003 Ju; 97(1)1163-7, table of contents.
23. Wahl MJ, Overton D, Howell J, Siege/ E, Schmttt MM, Muldoon M. Pain on injection of prilocaine plain vs. tidocaine with epinephrine. A prospective double-biind study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Oct; 132(10):1396-401; quiz 1460.
24. Campbell WI, Kendrck RW, Ramsay-Baggs P, McCaughey W. The effect of preoperative administration of bupivacaine compared wtth its postoperative use. Anaesthesia. 1997 Dec; 52(12): 1212-6.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com