You are here

ORTA OBSTRÜKTİF UYKU APNE SENDROMLU BİR OLGUDA MANDİBULAR İLERLETİCİ SPLİNTİN ÜSTÜN ETKİSİNİN SEFALOMETRİK VE POLİSOMNOGRAFİK OLARAK GÖSTERİLMESİ

CEPHALOGRAPHIC AND POLYSOMNOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF EXCELLENT EFFICIACY OF THE MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT SPLINT IN A PATIENT WITH MODERATE OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA SYNDROME

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a chronic disorder of sleep and breathing characterized by recurrent obstruction of the upper airway. Oral appliances are used to treat mild-to-severe OSAS when nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) treatment is not tolerated or refused by the patient. A 52-year-old male referred to the Department of Chest Diseases with snoring and excessive daytime sleepiness. He was diagnosed as moderate OSAS and refused to be treated with nCPAP. He was given mandibular advancement splint (MAS) therapy and his compliance to the device was expressive. After 6 months treatment, all his symptoms related to OSAS were improved. Polysomnographic (PSG) evaluation showed decrease in his apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) from 27 events per hour to 0.5 events per hour. Besides, the cephalometric evaluation revealed increase in naso-oro-hypopharynx spaces and posterior airway space. The distance between mandibular plane and hyoid decreased, since hyoid bone had been elevated to the front and up with the appliance. In conclusion, nCPAP is the first choice of treatment in moderate and severe OSAS. However, if the patients refuse or show no adherence to CPAP therapy, oral appliances can be used successfully.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Obstrüktif Uyku Apne Sendromu (OUAS) üst hava yolunun tekrarlanan tıkanmalarınca karakterize uyku ve solunumun kronik bir düzensizliğidir. Oral Apareyler (OA) hafif ve hastalar tarafından nasal Devamlı Pozitif Havayolu Basıncı(nDPHB)nı tolere edilemeyen veya ret edilen ağır OUAS'nu tedavi etmek için kullanılmaktadırlar. 52 yaşında erkek bir hasta horlama, aşırı güniçi uykululuk semptomları ile Göğüs Hastalıkları A. D.'na başvurdu. Orta OUAS teşhis edildi, ve NDPHB ile tedavi edilmeyi ret etti. Hastaya Mandibuler İlerletici Splint (MİS) terapisi verildi, ve ağız içi aygıta uyumu yüksekti. Tedaviden 6 ay sonra, OUAS ile ilişkili tüm semptomlar düzeldi. Polisomnografik (PSG) değerlendirme hastanın Apne-Hipopne İndeksi (AHİ)nin saatte 27'den 0.5'e düştüğünü gösterdi. Ayrıca, sefalometrik inceleme oro-farinks alanı ve Posterior Havayolu Alanı (PHA)da artışı gösterdi. Hyoid kemiği aparey ile öne ve yukarı kaldırılmış olduğu için, Mandibuler Düzlem ve Hyoid arasındaki mesafe (MD-H) azaldı. MİS terapisi OUAS'lı uygun endikasyonlu hastalarda başarılı olarak kullanılabilmektedir.
31-36

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Magliocca KR, Helman JI. Obstructive sleep apnea: Diagnosis, medical management and dental implications. J Am Den Assoc 2005; 136:1121-29.
2. Sullivan CE, Berthon-Jones M, Issa FG, Eves L. Reversal of obstructive sleep apnea by continuous positive airway pressure applied to the nares. Lancet 1981; 1:862-5.
3. Pepin JL, Leger P, Veale D, Langevin B, Robert D, Levy P. Side effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in sleep apnea syndrome: Study of 193 patients in two French sleep centers. Chest 1995; 107:375-81.
4. Meurice JC, Dore P, Paquereau J, Neau JP, Ingrand P, Chavagnat JJ et al. Predictive factors of long-term nasal continuous positive airway pressure treatment in sleep apnea syndrome. Chest 1994;
105:429-33.
5. Gale DJ, Sawyer RH, Woodcock A, Stone P, Thompson R, O'Brien K. Do oral appliances enlarge the airway in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea? A prospective computerised tomographic study. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22:159-68.
6. Schmidt-Nowara W, Lowe A, Wiegand L, Cartwright R, Perez-Guerra F, Menn S. Oral appliances for the treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea: A review. Sleep 1995; 18:501-10.
7. Clark GT. Mandibular advancement devices and sleep disordered breathing. Sleep Med Rev 1998;
2:163-74.
8. Liu Y, Lowe AA, Fleetham JA, Park YC. Cephalometric and physiologic predictors of the efficacy of an adjustable oral appliance for treating obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 120:639-47.
9. Prinsell JR. Cover story maxillomandibular advancement surgery for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. J Am Dent Assoc 2002; 133:1489-97.
10. Nayar S, Knox J. Management of obstructive sleep apnea in an edentulous patient with a mandibular advancement splint: A clinical report. J Prosthet
Dent 2005; 94:108-11.
11. Johal A, Battagel JM. Current principles in the management of obstructive sleep apnoea with mandibular advancement appliances. Br Dent J 2001; 190:532-6.
12. Fransson AMC, Tegelberg A, Svenson BAH, Lennartsson B, Isacsson G. Influence of mandibular protruding device on airway passages and dentofacial characteristics in obstructive sleep apnea and snoring. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 2002; 122:371-9.
13. American Sleep Disorders Association Standards of Practice Committee. Practice parameters for the indications for polysomnography and related procedures. Sleep 1997; 20:406-22.
14. Ivanhoe JR, Cibirka RM, Lefebvre CA, Parr GR. Dental considerations in upper airway sleep disorders: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:685-98.
15. Yoshida K. Effect of a prosthetic appliance for treatment of sleep apnea syndrome on masticatory and tongue muscle activity. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:537-44
16. Yoshida K. Prosthetic therapy for sleep apnea syndrome. J Prosthet Dent 1994 72:296-302.
17. Clark GT. Mandibular advancement devices and sleep disordered breathing. Sleep Med Rev 1998;2:163-74.
18. Ferguson KA, Cartwright R, Rogers R, Schmidt-Nowara W. Oral appliances for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea: A review. Sleep
2006;29:244-62.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com