You are here

Home » Content

DENTAL İMPLANTLAR İLE REHABİLİTE EDİLMİŞ HASTALARIN MEMNU NİYET DERECELERİNİN DEĞERRENDİRİLMESİ

THE SATISFACTION DEGREE EVALUATION OF THE PATIENTS TREATED WITH DENTAL IMPLANTS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Implant supported fixed or removable prosthesis are being used for almost four decades with low frequency of failure. Plenty number of articles related to the success rate of dental implants have been published over the years but only a minority of these have dealed with patient-centered outcomes of implant dentistry. The aim of the present study is to analyse the patients' perception of implant therapy and their satisfaction degree from a functional and aesthetic point of view, 6 years following installation of titanium oral implants between years 2001-2007. A total of 104 patients after a 6 year follow up period who received clinically and radiographically successful implants, were included in the study. The patients were asked to fill a questionnaire with 12 questions, interrogating their satisfaction degree about the implant supported prothesis they are using subjectively. Almost half of the patients did not quite know if it is easier for them to clean their implants than their teeth and if the tissues around their implants bleed less than those around their teeth. Most of the patients who underwent implant therapy are completely or partially satisfied with the therapy although they complain about the costs of the therapy.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
İmplant destekli sabit veya hareketli protezler, yaklaşık 40 yıldır düşük implant kaybı yüzdeleri ile başarılı bir şekilde kullanılmaktadırlar. Dental implantların başarısı ile ilgili birçok makale yayınlanmış fakat bunların az bir kısmı hasta memnuniyetini baz almıştır. Çalışmamızın amacı 2001-2007 yılları arasında dental implantlar ile rehabilite edilmiş hastaların implant destekli protezlerinin kullanımından duydukları memnuniyet derecelerini subjektif olarak belirlemektir. 104 adet hasta, tedavi ve gözetim süresince klinik ve radyolojik olarak başarılı kabul edilme şartı ile incelenmiş ve 6 yıllık gözetim sonunda hastalara 12 sorudan oluşan ve hastaların dental implant destekli protezlerini subjektif olarak sorgulayan bir anket formu uygulanmıştır. Hastaların yaklaşık yarısı implant temizliğinin diş fırçalamaktan daha kolay olup olmadığı ve impant çevresi dişeti kanaması ile diş etrafındaki diş eti kanaması arasında fark olup olmadığı hakkında net bir görüş savunamamıştır. Çalışmada yer alan hastaların büyük çoğunluğu fonksiyon, fonasyon ve estetik açıdan dental implant tedavisinden memnun kalmışlar fakat tedavi maliyetleri konusunda memnuniyetsizliklerini dile getirmişlerdir
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-dental-implantlar-ile-rehabilite-edilmis-hastalarin-memnu-niyet-derecelerinin-degerrendirilmesi.pdf
  • 3
181-186
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Albrektsson, T. & Isidor, F. Consensus report of session IV. In: Lang, N.P. & Karring, T., eds. Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Periodontology. 1994; 365-369. Berlin: Quintessence
2. Lang, N.P., Karring, T. & Meredith, N. Group E summary 4th European Workshop on Periodontology, periodontal practice. Journal of Clinical Periodontology (Suppl. 3) 2002;29: 232¬233.
3. Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Bürgin W, Brâgger U, Lang NP. Patients' satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(2):185-93
4. Wismeyer, D., Vermeeren, J.I. & van Waas, M.A. Patient satisfaction with overdentures supported by one-stage TPS implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1992;(7):51-55
5. Walton, J.N. & MacEntee, M.I. A retrospective study on the maintenance and repair of implant-supported prostheses. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1996;6: 451-455.
6. Walton, J.N., MacEntee, M.I. & Glick, N. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2002;17: 391-398.
7. Branemark, P.I., Engstrand, P., Ohrnell, L.O., Grondahl, K., Nilsson, P., Hagberg, K., Darle, C. & Lekholm, U. Branemark Novum: a new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 1999;1: 2-16.
8. Sandberg, G., Stenberg, T. & Wikblad, K. Ten years of patients' experiences with fixed implant-supported prostheses. Journal of Dental Hygiene
2000;74: 210-218.
9. Gibbard, L.L. & Zarb, G. A 5-year prospective study of implant-supported single-tooth replacements. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 2002;68: 110-116.
10. Levine, R.A., Clem, D., Beagle, J., Ganeles, J., Johnson, P., Solnit, G. & Keller, G.W. Multicenter retrospective analysis of the solidscrew ITI implant for posterior single-tooth replacements. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2002;17: 550-556.
11. de Bruyn H, Collaert B, Linden U, Björn AL. Patient's opinion and treatment outcome of fixed rehabilitation on Brânemark implants. A 3-year follow-up study in private dental practices. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994;8(4): 265-71.
12. Cune, M.S., de Putter, C. & Hoogstraten, J. Treatment outcome with implant-retained overdentures: part II - patient satisfaction and predictability of subjective treatment outcome. Journal ofProsthetic Dentistry 1994;72: 152-158.
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
Cilt: 19, Sayı: 3, Yıl: 2009, Sayfa: 181-186
ERGUN, ÇEKİCİ, SARUHANOĞLU KAZANCIOĞLU, UZMAN, AK, TANYERİ
13. Naert, I., Gizani, S. & van Steenberghe, D. Rigidly splinted implants in the resorbed maxilla to retain a hinging overdenture: a series of clinical reports for up to 4 years. Journal of ProstheticDentistry
1998;79: 156-164.
14. Bakke, M., Holm, B. & Gotfredsen, K. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supportedmandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2002;15: 575-581.
15. Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Consensus report: towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(6): 641.
16. Vermylen K, Collaert B, Linden U, Björn AL, De Bruyn H. Patient satisfaction and quality of single-tooth restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res.
2003;14(1):119-24. .
17. R. S. R.Buch, G.Weibrich, J.Wegener, W.Wagner. Patientenzufriedenheit in der Implantologie. Mund Kiefer GesichtsChir 2002;6: 433-436.
18. R. Timmerman , G.T. Stoker, D. Wismeijer, P. Oosterveld, J.I.J.F. Vermeeren, and M.A.J. van Waas An Eight-year Follow-up to a Randomized Clinical Trial of Participant Satisfaction with Three Types of Mandibular Implant-retained Overdentures. J Dent Res 2004;83(8): 630-633.
19. Att W, Stappert C Implant therapy to improve quality of life. Quintessence Int. 2003;34(8): 573¬81.
20. Clancy JM, Buchs AU,Ardjmand H. A retrospective analysis of one implant system in an oral surgery practice. Phase I:patient satisfaction.J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:265-271.
21. Kiyak HA, Beach BH,Worthington P,Taylor T, Bolender C, Evans J. Psychological impact of osseointegrated dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5: 61-69.
22. Wismeijer D,Van Waas MA,Vermeeren JI, Mulder J,Kalk W Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures.A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;26: 263¬267.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com