You are here

Home » Content

İSKELETSEL SINIF III MA LOKLUZONUN ERKEN DÖNEM TEDAVİSİ (VAKA RAPORU)

EARLY TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS III MALOCLUSION (CASE REPORT)

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This case report presents the treatment of a 8 years and 4 months old girl who had skeletal Class III malocclusion with 3 mm negative overjet and 3 mm overbite and a narrow maxilla using functional regulator of Frankel (FR III). Without fixed appliance application, prominent profile improvement and ideal overjet and overbite were all obtained as a result of 18 months Frankel Treatment alone. These changes were maintained at 3,5 years after treatment. This case report indicates that successful outcomes may be achieved with FR III application in patients with Class III malocclusion in the early mixed dentition period.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu vaka raporu dar bir maksillaya, 3 mm overbite ve 3 mm negatif overjetle karakterize iskeletsel Sınıf III anomaliye sahip, kronolojik yaşı 8 yıl 4 ay olan bir kız hastanın Frankel'in fonksiyonel regülatörü (FR III) ile tedavisini sunmaktadır. Sabit ortodontik aygıtlar kullanılmaksızın sadece FR III aygıtı ile yapılan 18 aylık tedavi sonucunda profilde belirgin bir düzelme olduğu, ayrıca ideal overjet ve overbite'ın sağladığı gözlendi. Elde edilen bu değişiklikler 3,5 yıl sonra da korunmuştu. Bu vaka raporu, Sınıf III maloklüzyonlu hastaların Frankel III ile tedavisinde erken karışık dişlenme döneminde başarılı sonuçlar alınabileceğini göstermektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-iskeletsel-sinif-iii-ma-lokluzonun-erken-donem-tedavisi-vaka-raporu.pdf
  • 3
192-197
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1.
Doğa
n S, Ertürk N. Ortopedik yüz maskesi ile tedavi edilmiş iskeletsel sınıf III vakaların geç dönemde değerlendirilmesi. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi. Kasım 1990;3:134-43.
2.
Gazilerl
i U. Normal kapanışlı 13-16 yaş arasındaki Ankara çocuklarında Steiner normları. Doçentlik tezi Ankara;1976.
3. Haas AJ. Palatal expansion: just the begining of dentofacial orthopedics. Am J Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop 1970;57:219-55
4- Ellis E, Mcnamara JA Jr. Components of adult class III openbite malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1984;86:277-90.
5- Jacobson A, Evans WG, Preston CB, Sadowsky PL. Mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1974;66:140-71.
6- Wendell, PD, Nanda R, Sakamoto T, Nakamura S. The effects of chin cup therapy on the mandible: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1985;87:265-74.
7- Stensland A, Wisth PJ, Böe OE. Dentofacial changes in children with negative overjet treated by a combined orthodontic and orthopaedic approach. Eur J Orthod 1988;10:39-51.
8- Deguchi T, Mcnamara JA. Craniofacial adaptations induced by chincup therapy in class III patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:175-82.
9- Da Silva Filho OG, Boas MC, Capelozza Filho L. Rapid maxillary expansion in the primary and mixed dentitions: a cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:171-9.
10. Macdonald KE, Kapust AJ, Turley PK. Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Jul;116:13-24.
11. Frankel R. Maxillary retrusion in Class 3 and treatment with the function corrector III. Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc 1970;249-59.
12.
Akç
a E. SIII maloklüzyonların erken dönem tedavisinde kullanılan FR3 apareyi ve ortopedik yüz maskesinin dentofasiyal ve yumuşak dokular üzerine etkilerinin karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara 1999.
13. McNamara JA, Huge SA. Functional regulator (FR-3) of Frankel. Am J Orthod 1985;88:409-24.
14. Kalogirou K, Ahlgren J, Klinge B. Effects of buccal shields on the maxillary dentoalveolar structures and the midpalatal suture--histologic and biometric studies in rabbits. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1996;109:521-30.
15. Levin AS, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L, Baccetti T, Frankel C. Short-term and long-term treatment outcomes with the FR-3 appliance of Frankel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:513-24.
16. Kocadereli I. Early orthopedic treatment for Class III skeletal pattern. ASDC J Dent Child.
1998;65:177-81.
17. Aytan S, Yukay F, Ciğler S, Enacar A, Aksoy A, Telli AE. [Frankel III appliance] Turk Ortodonti Derg
1989;2:338-45.
18. Işiksal E, Seçkin O. The functional regulators (FR III, FR IV)] Turk Ortodonti Derg 1990;3:150-6.
19. Miethke RR, Lindenau S, Dietrich K. The effect of Frankel's function regulator type III on the apical base. Eur J Orthod 2003;25:311-8.
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
Cilt: 19, Sayı: 3, Yıl: 2009, Sayfa: 192-197
ÇELİKOĞLU, KİKİ, OKTAY
20. Falck F, Zimmermann-Menzel K. Cephalometric changes in the treatment of class III using the Frankel appliance. J Orofac Orthop. 2008
Mar;69(2):99-109.
21. Ülgen M, Firatli S. The effects of the Frankel's function regulator on the Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:561-7.
22. Kerr WJ, TenHave TR. A comparison of three appliance systems in the treatment of Class III malocclusion. Eur J Orthod 1988;10:203-14.
23. Biren S, Erverdi N. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary retrognathism cases treated with FR-3 appliance. J Marmara Univ Dent Fac 1993;1:354-
60.
24. Kalavritinos M, Papadopoulos MA, Nasiopoulos A. Dental arch and cephalometric changes following treatment for class III malocclusion by means of the function regulator (FR-3) appliance. J Orofac Orthop. 2005 Mar;66(2):135-47.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com