You are here

Home » Content

INTRAORAL FOKAL REAKTIF LEZYONLARIN HISTOPATOLOJJIK ANALİZİ

HISTOPATHOLOGIC ANALYSIS OF THE INTRAORAL FOCAL REACTIVE LESIONS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Objectıve:We aimed to examine the rates, frequencies, age and sex distributions and sizes of intraoral focal reactive lesions in the pathological materials. Method: The archives of the examined materials between years 2001- 2010 were reviewed, the information in focal reactive intraoral lesions were brought together, the information were listed and statistical analysis were carried out. Findings: The ratio of female/male was 2.4/1 in the materials of 150 patients. The average age was over 40 years in the patients who had fibroepithelial hyperplasias and irritation fibromas, and was 33 years in the reparative giant cell granulomas. The diameter was largest in fibroosseos lesions (12 mm), and smallest in irritation fibromas and epulis fissurata (7 mm). Results: The findings of our series were seen to be consistent with the literature. It was considered that some quantitative differences may be caused by the small number of the materials examined, and due to the lack of dental and maxillofacial surgeon in our hospital, the lesions being excised by an Ear Nose Throat specialist.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Patoloji materyalimizde ağız içindeki fokal reaktif lezyonların sıklık ve oranlarını, yaş, cinsiyet dağılımları ve büyüklüklerini incelemeyi amaçladık. Metod: 2001- 2010 yıllarında incelediğimiz materyale ait arşiv gözden geçirilerek intraoral fokal reaktif lezyonlara ait bilgiler bir araya getirildi, bilgiler listelendi ve istatistik inceleme yapıldı. Bulgular: 150 hastaya ait materyalde kadın/erkek oranı 2.4/1 hesaplandı. Fibroepitelyal hiperplazi ve fibromlu hastaların yaş ortalaması 40'ın üzerinde, reparatif dev hücreli granülomlularda 33 bulundu. Çap; fibroosseoz lezyonlarda en büyük (12 mm), irritasyon fibromu ve epulis fissuratumlarda ise en küçük (7 mm) olarak hesaplandı. Sonuçlar: Dizimize ait bulgularda, genellikle literatüre uygunluk görülmektedir. Görülebilen bazı sayısal farklılıkların ise hasta sayımızın azlığı ve incelediğimiz materyallerin hastanemizde diş hekimi ve çene cerrahı olmamasından dolayı, genellikle Kulak Burun Boğaz uzmanları tarafından gönderilmesinden kaynaklandığı düşünülmüştür.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-intraoral-fokal-reaktif-lezyonlarin-histopatolojjik-analizi.pdf
  • 3
226-230
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Scully C, de Almedia OP, Bagan J, Dios PD, Taylor AM. Oral Medicine and Pathology at a Glance,
Blackwell Pub. Ltd., 2010
2. Günhan Ö. Oral ve Maksillofasial Patoloji, Atlas Kitapçılık, Ankara, 2001
3.
Oygü
r T. Ağız Patolojisi Ders Kitabı, Eflatun Yayınevi, Ankara, 2010
4. Effiome OA, Adeyemo WL, Soyele OO. Focal reactive lesions of the gingiva: An analysis of 314 cases at a tertiary health institution in Nigeria. Nigerian Medical Journal, 2010; 52 (1): 35-40
5. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Saunders, St Louis,
2009
6. van der Waal I, Snow GB. Benign Tumors and Tumorlike Lesions of Oral Cavity and Orapharynx. In: Cummings CW, Fredrickson JM,Harker LA,Krause CJ, Schuller DE, eds. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 2nd ed. Mosby -Year
Book: St. Louis; 1993. p. 1237-47.
7. Kolte AP, Kolte RA, Shrirao TS. Focal fibrous overgrowth. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry 2010;
1(4): 271- 274
8.
Büyükl
ü F, Babakurban ST, Çaylak B, Çakmak Ö. Epulis Fissuratum. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık
Bilimleri Dergisi. 2010: 1(4): 229- 231
9. Torres-Domingo S, Bagan JV, Jimenez Y ve ark. Benign tumors of the oral mucosa a study of 300 patients. Med Oral Pathol Oral Cir Buccal, 2008; 13 (3): 161-6
10. Özcan E, Çanakçı CF, Filinta D. Importance of the vaccination in recurrent squamous papilloma on the gingiva. Pakistan Oral and Dental Journal,
2011; 31(1): 162- 168
11. Odell EW. Papillomas, Ed: Barnes
l
, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D.: Head and Neck Tumours.
WHO, Lyon, 2005.
12. Al-Khateeb T, Ababneb K. Oral pyogenic granuloma in Jordanians: a retrospective analysis of 108 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2003; 61 (11): 1285- 8
13. Nufiez GMA, de Vasconcelos C M, Benevenuto TG, ve ark. Oral pyogenic granuloma: a retrospective analysis of 293 cases in a Brazillian population. J.
Oral Mazillofac Surg. 2010; 68 (9): 2185- 8
14. Saravana G.H. Oral pyogenic granuloma: a review of 137 cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009; 47(4): 318- 9
229
Atatürk Univ. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
J Dent
Fac Atatürk Uni
Cilt:21, Sayı: 3, Yıl: 2011, Sayfa: 226-230
KURT
15. Lawoyin JO, Arotba JT, Dosumu OO. Oral pyogenic granuloma: a review of 38 cases from Abadan, Nigeria. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 35 (3):
185-9
16. Patrice SJ, Wiss K, Mulliken JB. Pyogenic granuloma (lobular capillary hemangioma) a clinicopathologic study of 178 cases. Pediatr
Dermatol, 1991; 8 (4) 267- 76
17. Zarbo RD.: The Jaws and Oral Cavity. Ed: Mills SE, Carter D. Sternberg's Surgical Pathology, Diagnostic Surgical Pathology, 5th edition, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2010
18.
Barı
ş E, Gültekin SE, Bozkaya S.: Periferal dev hücreli granülomların klinikopatolojik olarak değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hek Fak
Dergisi 2010; 20(2): 79- 83
19. Pour MAH, Radi M, Mojdahedi A.: A survey of soft tumour-like lesions of oral cavity: a clinicopathological study. Iranian Journal of
Pathology, 2008; 3(2): 81- 87
20.
Tokma
n B, Şengüven B, Türkseven MR.: Periferal ossifiye fibrom; 50 vakalık seride klinik ve histopatolojik değerlendirme. A.U. Diş Hek Fak
Dergisi 2005; 32(1): 1-7
21. Cuisia ZE, Brannon RB.: Peripheral ossifying fibroma- a clinical evaluation of 134 pediatric cases. Pediatr Dent 2001; 23 (3): 245- 8

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com