You are here

Home » Content

SİVAS BÖLGESİNDE ARTI DİŞLERİN YAYGINLIĞININ ARAŞTIRILMASI

THE INVESTIGATION OF PREVALENCE OF SUPERNUMERARY TEETH IN THE SIVAS REGION

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Aim: In this study, it is aimed to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth and evaluate the associated pathologies and treatment protocol. Material and Method: In this retrospective study, a total of 8955 panoramic radiographs of patients who presented at our clinic between the years of 2000 to 2010 and records of patients were used. The number, location, position, type, and morphology of supernumerary teeth were determined. Their associated pathologies or complications, and whether any treatment has been carried out was evaluated. Results: A total 117 supernumerary teeth was determined on 78 patients who were ranging in age from 5 to 67, and with a mean age of 22.04±8.86 years. It was found that the most commonly, supernumerary teeth were on male and patients with a 1.29:1 male:female ratio. The most commonly supernumerary teeth were distomolar on 29 cases (35.80%) and mesiodens on 24 cases (29.63%), premolar on 20 cases (24.69%), paramolar on 4 cases (4.94%), lateral on 3 cases (3.70%), and canine on 1 case (1.24%) was found. It was determined that 50 of 78 supernumerary cases was no pathology (64.1%) and 60.68% of supernumerary teeth followed up. Conclusion: The pravelence of supernumerary teeth was found 0.87%. In this present study as different other studies in literature, it was determined that the best common supernumerary teeth were distomolars and the best common morphology of supernumerary teeth was premolar form.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Bu çalışmada, artı dişlerin özelliklerini ve prevalansını araştırıp, olası patolojiler ile ilişkilerini değerlendirmek ve uygulanacak tedavi protokollerine rehberlik yapmak amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu retrospektif çalışmada, 2000¬2010 yılları arasında kliniğimize başvuran hastalara ait 8955 adet panoramik röntgen ve hastaların kayıtları kullanıldı. Artı dişlerin sayısı, lokalizasyonu, pozisyonu, tipi ve biçimi belirlendi. Patolojiler ya da komplikasyonlarla ilişkileri ve herhangi bir tedavi uygulanıp uygulanmadığı değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Yaş ortalamaları 22,04±8,86 ve 5-67 yaş aralığında olan 78 hastada 117 adet artı diş varlığı tespit edildi. Artı dişlerin en fazla erkeklerde görüldüğü ve artı dişi olan erkeklerin, artı dişi olan kadınlara oranı 1,29:1 olarak bulundu. En fazla 29 olgu ile distomolar (%35,80), 24 olgu ile meziyodens (%29,63), 20 olgu ile premolar (%24,69), 4 olgu ile paramolar (%4,94), 3 olgu ile lateral (%3,70) ve 1 olgu ile kanin (%1,24) artı dişleri bulundu. 78 olgunun 50'sinde (%64,1) ise hiçbir patolojiye neden olmadıkları saptandı. Artı dişlerin büyük bir kısmının (%60,68) çekilmeden bırakıldığı belirlendi. Sonuç: Artı diş prevalansı %0,87 olarak bulundu. Literatürdeki diğer çalışmalardan farklı olarak mevcut çalışmada, artı dişlerin en fazla distomolarlardan oluştuğu ve morfolojik olarak küçük azı dişi şeklinde olduğu saptandı.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-sivas-bolgesinde-arti-dislerin-yayginliginin-arastirilmasi.pdf
  • 3
189-195
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1.
Ezirganl
ı Ş, Köşger HH. Sürnümerer mikrodonti: iki olgu sunumu. Dicle Dişhekimliği Derg 2010;11:
7-10.
2. Bayrak S, Dalci K, Sari S. Evaluation of supernumerary teeth with computerized tomography: case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100: 65-9.
3.
Dağista
n S, Göregen M, Sümbüllü A. Artı dişler (vaka raporu). Atatürk Univ Diş Hek Fak Derg
2004;14: 79-81.
4. Batra P, Duggal R, Parkash H. Non-syndromic multiple supernumerary teeth transmitted as an autosomal dominant trait: case report. J Oral
Pathol Med 2005;34: 621-5.
5. Proff
P
, Fanghanel J, Allegrini Jr. S, Bayerlein T, Gedrange T. Problems of supernumerary teeth, hyperdontia or dentes supernumerarii. Ann Anat 2006;188:163-9.
6. Desai RS, Shah NP. Multiple supernumerary teeth in two brothers: a case report. J Oral Pathol Med
1998;27: 411-3.
7. Moore SR, Wilson DF, Kibble J. Sequential development of multiple supernumerary teeth in the mandibular premolar region - a radiographic case report. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2002;12: 143-5.
8. Langowska-Adamczyk H, Karmanska B. Similar locations of impacted and supernumerary teeth in monozygotic twins: a report of 2 cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119: 67-70.
9. Grimanis GA, Kyriakides AT, Spyropoulos ND. A survey on supernumerary molars. Quintessence
Int 1991;22: 989-95.
10.
Gündü
z K, Celenk P, Zengin Z, Sümer P. Mesiodens: a radiographic study in children. J
Oral Sci 2008;50: 287-91.
11. Esenlik E, Sayin MO, Atilla AO, Ozen T, Altun C, Başak F. Supernumerary teeth in a Turkish population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
2009;136: 848-52.
12. Hurlen B, Humerfelt D. Characteristics of premaxillary hyperdontia. a radiographic study. Acta Odontol Scand 1985;43: 75-81.
13. Salem G. Prevalence of selected dental anomalies in Saudi children from Gizan region. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1989;17: 162-3.
14. Thongudomporn U, Freer TJ. Prevalence of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Aust Dent J
1998;43: 395-8.
15. Celikoglu M, Kamak H, Oktay H. Prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in a non-syndrome Turkish population: associated pathologies and proposed treatment. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15: 575-8.
16. Salcido-Garcia JF, Ledesma-Montes C, Hernandez-Flores F, Perez D, Garces-Ortiz M. Frequency of supernumerary teeth in Mexican population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2004;9: 407-9.
17. Liu DG, Zhang WL, Zhang ZY, Wu YT, Ma XC. Three-dimensional evaluations of supernumerary teeth using cone-beam computed tomography for 487 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103: 403-11.
18. Yagüe-Garcia J, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Multiple supernumerary teeth not associated with complex syndromes: a retrospective study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14: 331-6.
19. Scheiner MA, Sampson WJ. Supernumerary teeth: a review of the literature and four case reports.
Aust Dent. J 1997;42: 160-165.
20.
Tüme
n EC, Yavuz i, Tümen DS, Hamamcı N, Doğan S. Artı dişlerin değerlendirilmesi: klinik çalışma. Dicle Diş Hek Derg 2009; 10:4-8.
21. Rajab LD, Hamdan MA. Supernumerary teeth: review of the literature and a survey of 152 cases.
Int J Paediatr Dent 2002;12: 244-254.
22. Bodin I, Julin P, Thomsson M. Hyperodontia. I. Frequency and distribution of supernumerary teeth among 21,609 patients. Dentomaxillofac
Radiol 1978;7: 15-7.
23. Leco Berrocal MI, Martin Morales JF, Martinez Gonzalez JM. An observational study of the frequency of supernumerary teeth in a population of 2000 patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007;12: E134-8.
194
Atatürk
Univ
. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni
Cilt:21, Sayı: 3, Yıl: 2011, Sayfa: 189-195
EZİRGANLI, UN, KIRTAY,
ÖZER, KÖŞGER
24. Yusof WZ. Non-syndrome multiple supernumerary teeth: literature review. J Can Dent Assoc 1990;56: 147-9.
25.
Açikgö
z A, Açikgöz G, Tunga U, Otan F. Characteristics and prevalence of non-syndrome multiple supernumerary teeth: a retrospective study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35: 185-90.
26. Fernandez Montenegro P, Valmaseda Castellon E, Berini Aytes L, Gay Escoda C. Retrospective study of 145 supernumerary teeth. Med Oral Patol Oral
Cir Bucal 2006;11: 339-44.
27.
Gündü
z K, Celenk P. Distomolarlar üzerine retrospektif bir çalışma. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental
Sci 2006;12: 83-6.
28. Miyoshi S, Tanaka S, Kunimatsu H, Murakami Y, Fukami M, Fujisawa S. An epidemiological study of supernumerary primary teeth in Japanese children: a review of racial differences in the prevalence. Oral Dis 2000;6: 99-102.
29. Kramer PF, Feldens CA, Ferreira SH, Spiguel MH, Feldens EG. Dental anomalies and associated factors in 2- to 5-year-old Brazilian children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008;18: 434-40.
30. Jarvinen S, Lehtinen L. Supernumerary and congenitally missing primary teeth in Finnish children. An epidemiologic study. Acta Odontol
Scand 1981;39: 83-6.
31. Magnusson TE. Hypodontia, hyperodontia, and double formation of primary teeth in Iceland. An epidemiological study. Acta Odontol Scand
1984;42: 137-9.
32. Costa Pinho TM, Figueiredo Pollmann MC. Study of the frequency and the features of supranumerary teeth found in one Portuguese population. Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol
Odontol 2004;46: 52-62.
33. Onyeaso CO, Oneyeaso AO. Occlusal/dental anomalies found in a random sample of Nigerian schoolchildren. Oral Health Prev Dent 2006;4: 181-6.
34. Gabris K, Tarjan I, Fabian G, Kaan M, Szakaly T, Orosz M. Frequency of supernumerary teeth and possibilities of treatment. Fogorv Sz 2001;94:
53-7.
35. Davis PJ. Hypodontia and hyperdontia of permanent teeth in Hong Kong schoolchildren. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1987;15:
218-20.
36. Ezoddini AF, Sheikhha MH, Ahmadi H. Prevalence of dental developmental anomalies: a radiographic study. Community Dent Health
2007;24: 140-4.
37.
Şerme
t U, Yıldırım S. Konya ili ve çevresinde yaşayan 3-12 yaş grubu çocuklarda artı diş prevalansı: retrospektif çalışma. SU Dişhek Fak
Derg 2007;16: 14-7.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com