You are here

GELENEKSEL VE ADEZİV DENTAL SİMANLAR HAKKINDA BİR DERLEME ÇALIŞMASI

CONVENTIONAL AND ADHESIVE DENTAL LUTING AGENTS; A LITERATURE REVIEW

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
Fixed prosthodontic approaches in restorative dentistry are changed with the introduction of innovative techniques and materials in recent years. With this change, improvements and modification of luting agents became mandotary. Luting agents provide the mechanical bond and adhesion between a fixed prosthesis and the supporting tooth structure. Zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate cements retained their popularity for luting fixed prosthodontic restorations. Their disadvantages are particularly solubility and lack of adhesion. In order to struggle these problems glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer luting agents are firstly developed. Recently resin cements became popular, primarily because they overcame the disadvantages of solubility and lack of adhesion. In this literature review, luting agents and their proporties are explained in order to give information to the dentist which can be useful in clinical practice.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Son yıllarda sabit protetik yaklaşımlardaki teknik ve materyallerin değişimi simanların geliştirilmesini zorunlu hale getirmiştir. Simanlar sabit protetik restorasyon ve destek diş dokusu arasında mekanik bağlanma ve adezyon sağlar. Çinko fosfat simanlar ve çinko polikarboksilat simanlar sabit protetik restorasyonların yapıştırılmasında güncelliğini korumaktadırlar. Ancak adezyon eksikliği ve çözünürlük gibi dezavantajları vardır. Bu gibi sorunları gidermek için ilk olarak cam iyonomer simanlar ve reçine modifiye cam iyonomer simanlar geliştirilmiştir. Son zamanlarda ise reçine simanlar çözünürlük ve adezyon eksikliği gibi dezavantajların üstesinden geldikleri için kullanımı yaygınlanmıştır. Bu derleme çalışmasında simanlar ve taşıması gereken özellikler açıklanarak, hekime klinik pratiğinde kullanabileceği bilgiler verilmeye çalışılmıştır.
206-217

REFERENCES

References: 

1. O’Brien WJ. Dental Materials and Their
Selection,3rd ed. Canada, Quintessence, 2002:
p.132,35-143,46.
1. Pegoraro TA, da Silva NR, Carvalho RM. Cements
for use in esthetic dentistry. Dent Clin North Am.
2007;51(2):453-471
2. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current
status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J
Prosthet Dent 1999; (81):135-141.
3. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of
dental hard tissues, 1st ed. Chicago,
Quintessence,1998. p.97
4. Brannstrom M, Nyborg H. Bacterial growth and
pulpal changes under inlays cemented with zinc
phosphate cement and Epoxylite CBA 9080. J
Prosthet Dent 1974; (31):556.
5. Brannstrom M, Nyborg H. Comparison of pulpal
effect of two liners. Acta Odontol Scand 1969;
(27):443–451.
6. Akyor A. Tanalp J. Operatif Dişhekimliğinde
Gelişmeler Güncel Pratik Uygulamalar Cilt 1.
Birinci baskı. İstanbul, Quintessence 2006. s:98
7. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting
agents: A review of the current litarature. J
Prosthet Dent 1998;(80): 280-301
8. Önal B, Restoratif Dişhekimliğinde Maddeler ve
Uygulamaları, Birinci baskı, Ege Üniversitesi
Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Yayınları İzmir, 2004 p.111-
14,128-29
9. Caughman WF, Caughman GB, Dominy WT,
Schuster GS. Glass ionomer and composite resin
cements: effects on oral cells. J Prosthet Dent
1990; (63):513-521.
10. Fitzgerald M, Heys RJ, Heys DR, Charbeneau GT.
An evaluation of aglass ionomer luting agent:
bacterial leakage. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;
(114):783-786
11. Inoue S, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, De Munck J, Sano H,
Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Effects
of conditioner on bond strength of glass-ionomer
adhesive to dentin/enamel with and without
smear layer interposition. Oper Dent 2004;
29(6):685–692
12. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S,
Suzuki K, Lambrechts P. Four-year water
degradation of a resinmodified glass-ionomer
adhesive bonded to dentin. Eur J Oral Sci
2004;112(1):73–83.
13. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Glassionomer
adhesion: the mechanisms at the
interface, J Dent 2006:615–617.
14. Yli-Urpo H, Lassila LVJ, Narhi TO, Valittu PK.
Compressive strength and surface
characterization of glass ionomer cements modified by particles of bioactive glass. Dent
Mater 2005;(21):201–209.
15. Yli-Urpo H, Forsback AP, Vakiparta M, Narhi TO,
Valittu PK. Release of silica, calcium, phosphorus
and fluoride fromglass ionomer cement containing
bioactive glass. J Biomater Appl 2004;(19):5–20.
16. Palmer G, Jonesa FH, Billingtonb RW, Pearson GJ.
Chlorhexidine release from an experimental glass
ionomer cement. Biomaterials 2004;25(23): 5423-
5431
17. Sanares AM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR,
Pashley DH. Adverse surface interactions between
onebottle light-cured adhesives and chemicalcured
composites. Dent Mater 2001;(17):542–
556.
18. Cheong C, King NM, Pashley DH, Ferrari M,
Toledano M, Tay FR. Incompatibility of self-etch
adhesives with chemical/dual-cured composites:
two-step vs one-step systems. Oper Dent 2003;
(28): 747–755.
19. Suh BI, Feng L, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Factors
contributing to the incompatibility between
simplified- step adhesives and chemically cured or
dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic
resin monomers. J Adhes Dent 2003;(5):267–282.
20. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM,
Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are
permeable membranes. J Dent 2002;(30):371–
382.
21. Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegarora LF,
Silva NR, Pashley DH. Adhesive permeability
affects coupling of resin cements that utilise selfetching
primers to dentin. J Dent 2004;(32):55–
65.
22. Myers ML, Caughman WF, Rueggeberg FA. Effect
of restoration composition, shade, and thickness
on the cure of a photoactivated resin cement. J
Prosthodont 1994;(3):149–157.
23. El-Badrawy WA, El-Mowafy OM. Chemical versus
dual curing of resin inlay cements. J Prosthet
Dent 1995;(73):515-524.
24. Hasegawa EA, Boyer DB, Chan DC. Hardening of
dual-cured cements under composite resin inlays.
J Prosthet Dent 1991;(66):187–192.
25. White SN, Furuichi R, Kyomen SM. Microleakage
through dentin after crown cementation. J Endod
1995; (21):9-12.
26. White SN, Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Caputo AA.
Microleakage of new crown and fixed partial
denture luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1992;
67:156-61.
27. Tjan AH, Dunn JR, Grant BE. Marginal leakage of
cast gold crowns luted with an adhesive resin
cement. J Prosthet Dent 1992;(67):11-15.
28. Milleding P. Microleakage of indirect composite
inlays. An in vitro comparison with the direct
technique. Acta Odontol Scand 1992; (50):295-
301.
29. Blair KF, Koeppen RG, Schwartz RS, Davis RD.
Microleakage associated with resin composite
cemented cast glass ceramic restoration. Int J
Prosthod 1993; (6):579-584.
30. Ferrari M, Dalloca L, Kugel G, Bertelli E. An
evaluation of the effect of the adhesive luting on
microleakage of the IPS empress crowns. Pract
Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1994;(6):15-23.
31. Shortall AC, Fayyad MA, Williams JD. Marginal
seal of injection-molded ceramic crowns
cemented with three adhesive sistems. J Prosthet
Dent 1989;(61):24-27.
32. Strygler H, Nicholls JI, Townsend JD.
Microleakage at the resin-alloy interface of
chemically retained composite resins for cast
restorations. J Prosthet Dent1991;(65):733-739.
33. Darr AH, Jacobsen PH. Conversion of dual cure
luting cements. J Oral Rehabil 1995;(22):43-47.
34. Alanko K, Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Kannas L,
Estlander T. Oral mucosal diseases investigated
by patch testing with a dental screening series.
Contact Dermatitis 1996;(34):263-267.
35. Jolanki R, Kanerva L, Estlander T. Occupational
allergic contact dermatitis caused by epoxy
diacrylate in ultraviolet-light-cured paint, and
bisphenol A in dental composite resin. Contact
Dermatitis 1995;(33):94-99.
36. Bruze M. Sistemically induced contact dermatitis
from dental resin. Scand J Dent Res
1994;(102):376-378.
37. Bjorkner B, Niklasson B. Contact allergy to the UV
absorber Tinuvin P in a dental restorative
material. Am J Contact Dermat 1997; (8):6-7.
38. Dooms-Goossens A, Bruze M, Buysse L, Fregert S,
Gruvberger B, Stals H. Contact allergy to allyl
glycidyl ether present as an impurity in 3-
glycidyloxypropyl trimethoxysilane, a fixing
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. KÖROĞLU, EKREN,
J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni KURTOĞLU
Cilt:22, Sayı: 2, Yıl: 2012, Sayfa: 205-216
215
additive in silicone and polyurethane resins.
Contact Dermatitis 1995;(33):17-19.
39. Muzynski BL, Greener E, Jameson L, Malone WF.
Fluoride release from glass ionomers used as
luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1988;(60):41-44.
40. Rezk-Lega F, Ogaard B, Rolla G. Availability of
fluoride from glass ionomer luting cements in
human saliva. Scand J Dent Res 1991;(99):60-63.
41. Kao EC, Culbertson BM, Xie D. Preparation of
glass ionomer cement using N-acryloyl-substituted
amino acid monomers-evaluation of physical
properties. Dent Mater 1996;(12):44-51.
42. Gilbert JL, Ney DS, Lautenschlager EP. Selfreinforced
composite poly(methyl methacrylate):
static and fatigue properties. Biomaterials
1995;(16):1043-1055.
43. Bansal RK, Tewari US, Singh P, Murthy DV.
Modified polyalkenoate (glass-ionomer) cement—
a study. J Oral Rehabil 1995;(22):533-7.
44. Bruce WL, Stevens L. Strength properties of three
zinc phosphate cements mixed to two different
consistencies. Aust Dent J 1989;(34): 132-135.
45. Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Pareja C, Moore BK. In
vitro degradation of cements: a comparison of
three test methods. J Prosthet Dent 1989;(62):
17-23.
46. Osborne JW, Wolff MS. The effect of
powder/liquid ratio on the in vivo solubility of
polycarboxylate cement. J Prosthet Dent 1991;
(66): 49-51.
47. Um CM, Oilo G. The effect of early water contact
on glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence Int
1992;(23):209-214.
48. Curtis SR, Richards MW, Meiers JC. Early erosion
of glass-ionomer cement at crown margins. Int J
Prosthod 1993;6:553-7.
49. Rodrigues Garcia RC, De Goes MF, Del Bel Cury
AA. Influence of protecting agents on the
solubility of glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1995;(8):
294-296.
50. Cho E, Kopel H, White SN. Moisture susceptibility
of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials.
Quintessence Int 1995;(26):351-358.
51. Braem MJ, Lambrechts P, Gladys S, Vanherle G.
In vitro fatigue behavior of restorative composites
and glass ionomers. Dent Mater 1995;(11):137-
141.
52. Indrani DJ, Cook WD, Televantos F, Tyas MJ,
Harcourt JK. Fracture toughness of water-aged
resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater
1995;(11):201-207.
53. Feilzer AJ, Kakaboura AI, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL.
The influence of water sorption on the
development of shrinkage stress in traditional and
resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater
1995;(11):186-190.
54. Nordlander J, Weir D, Stoffer W, Ochi S. The
taper of clinical preparations for fixed
prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1988;(60):148-
151
55. Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Salama M. Influence of
tooth surface roughness and type of cement on
retention of complete cast crowns. J Prosthet
Dent 1997;(77):116-121.
56. Wiskott HW, Nicholls JI, Belser UC. The
Relationship between abutment taper and
resistance of cemented crowns to dynamic
loading. Int J Prosthod 1996;(9):117-139.
57. Fitchie JG, Zardiackas LD, Givan DA, Anderson L,
Caughman WF. Tensile fatigue of two composite
cements bonding three base metal alloys to
bovine enamel. Dent Mater 1993;(9):28-32.
58. Goracci C, Fabianelli A, Sadek FT, Papacchini F,
Tay FR, Ferrari M. The contribution of friction to
the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts. J
Endod 2005;(31):608–612.
59. Cury AH, Goracci C, de Lima Navarro MF, Carvallo
RM, Sadek FT, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Effect of
hygroscopic expansion on the push-out resistance
of glass ionomer-based cements used for the
luting of glass fiber posts. J Endod
2006;(32):537–540.
60. Michelini FS, Belser UC, Scherrer SS, De Rijk WG.
;Tensile bond strength of gold and porcelain
inlays to extracted teeth using three cements. Int
J Prosthod 1995;(8):324-331.
61. Wilson AD. Resin-modified glass ionomer
cements. Int J Prosthodont 1990; (3): 425-429
62. Malament KA, Grossman DG. Bonded vs nonbonded
Dicor crowns. J Dent Res 1992;71:321
63. Rosenstiel SF, Gupta PK, Van der Sluys RA,
Zimmerman MH. Strength of a dental glassceramic
after surface coating. Dent Mater
1993;(9):274-279.
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. KÖROĞLU, EKREN,
J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni KURTOĞLU
Cilt:22, Sayı: 2, Yıl: 2012, Sayfa: 205-216
216
64. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Relaxation of
polymerization contraction shear stress by
hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res 1990;(69): 36-
39.
65. Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder
AD Jr, Roberson TM. The clinical performance of
CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays: a four-year
study. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;(1279:1171-1181
66. Braga RR, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. In vitro Wear
simulation measurements ofcomposite versus
resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements for
all-ceramic restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent
2002; (14): 368-376,.
67. Brauer GM, Dulik DM, Antonucci JM, Termini DJ,
Argentar H. New amine accelerators for
composite restorative resins. J Dent Res
1979;(58): 1994-2000.
68. Berrong JM, Weed RM, Schwartz IS. Color stability
of selected dual-cure composite resin cements. J
Prosthodont 1993;(2):24-27.
69. Goshima T, Goshima Y. Optimum radiopacity of
composite inlay materials and cements. Oral Surg
1991;(72):257-260.
70. Rawls HR, Marshall MV, Cardenas HL, Bhagat HR,
Cabasso I. Cytotoxicity evaluation of a new
radiopaque resin additive-triphenyl bismuth. Dent
Mater 1992;(8):54-59.
71. Brackett WW, Vickery JM. The influence of mixing
temperature and powder/ liquid ratio on the film
thickness of three glass-ionomer cements. Int J
Prosthodont 1994;(7):13-16.
72. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Davidson CL, DeGee
AJ, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Dual
cure luting composites-part II: clinically related
properties. J Oral Rehabil 1994;(21):57-66.
73. Stark H. Does temporary cementing have an
effect on the bond strength of definitively
cemented crowns? Dtsch Zahnartzl Z
1991;(46):774-776.
74. Schwartz R, Davis R, Mayhew R. Effect of a ZOE
temporary cement on the bond strength of a resin
luting cement. Am J Dent 1990;(3):28-30.
75. Gregory WA, Campbell Z. Interim luting agents,
composite core surface hardness and retention of
interim and final restorations. Am J Dent
1990;(3):207-212
76. Abo-Hamar SE, Federlin M, Hiller KA, Friedl KH,
Schmalz G. Effect of temporary cements on the
bond strength of ceramic luted to dentin Dental
Materials 2005 ;21(9):794-803
77. F. Aykent, A. Usumez, N. Ozturk, MT. Yucel.
Effect of provisional restorations on the final bond
strengths of porcelain laminate veneers. Journal
of Rehabilitation 2005 (32); 46-50.
78. Pashley DH. Clinical correlations of dentin
structure and function. J Prosthet Dent 1991;
(66): 777-781.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com