You are here

Home » Content

ÇEŞİTLİ DEZENFEKTAN AJANLARIN PROTEZ OLÇU MADDELERİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ANTİBAKTERİAL ETKİLERİNİN ARAŞTIRILMASI

THE ANTIBACTERIAL EFFECTS OF VARIOUS DISINFECTANT SOLUTIONS ON THE IRREVERSIBLE HYDROCOLLOID IMPRESSIONS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1996

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Antibacterial effectiveness of four disinfectants (sodi um hypochl ori te, glutaraldehyde, chl orhexi dı ne gluconate and povidone iodine) on the irreversible hydrocolloid impressions are evaluated in this study. A sterile metal model of an maxillary arch contaminated with one of the following bacteria; Staphylococcus aureus. Bacillus subtjlis. Streptococcus mutans, Escherichia coli, and impressions were made. The impresions were cultured before and after immersion in one of the above mentioned disinfectants for 10 minutes. Colony forming units were counted. Sodium hypochlorite 5,0 % was found more effective than the three other agents against all test organisms
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Dîşhekimliği çalışmalarmdaen önemli konulardan biri de ortaya çıkan çapraz enfeksiyonunun kontrolüdür. Bu araştırmalarda, steril edilmiş bir metal maksiller model, dört değişik standart bskîeıi suşu ile (Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis. Streptococcus mulans ve Escherichia coli) ile kontamine edilmiş ve daha sonra alınan aljinal ölçüler ülkemiz dişhekimliğinde en çok kullanılan dört değişik dezenfektan ajan (sodyum hipoklorit, glutaraldehit, klorheksiditi glukonat, povidin iyodin) içinde 10 dakika süre ile tutulmuştur. Ölçülerden, dezenfektanlara atılmadan ve atıldıktan sonra alınan kültürlerden koloni sayımlan yapılmıştır. Teste tabi tutulan dezenfektan ajanlar içinde en etkilisinin sodyum hipoklorit (% 5'lik) olduğu saptanmıştır
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-cesitli-dezenfektan-ajanlarin-protez-olcu-maddeleri-uzerindeki-antibakterial-etkilerinin-arastirilmasi.pdf
  • 2
26-30
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1.
Akma
n M. Plak yöntemi ile jerm sayımı konusunda önerilen bazı kurallar. Mikrobiyoloji Bül 1974; 8(1): 87-96.
2. Asad T, Watkinson A, Huggett R. The effects of various disinfectant solutions on the surface hardness of an acrylic resin denture base material. Int J Prosthodont 1993; 6(1): 9-13.
3. Autio KL. Studies on cross-contamination in the dental clinic. J Am Dent Assoc 1980; 100: 358-61,
4. Bentley EM, Sarll DW. Improvements in cross-infection control in dental practice. Br Dent J 1995; 179: 19-21.
5. Beyerle MP, Hensley DM, Bradley DV, Schwartz RS, Hilton TJ- Immersion disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impression with sodium hypoclorite. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7(3): 235-8.
6. Checchi L, Montebugnali L, Boschi J, A Chill CD, Influence of dental glove type on the penetration of liquid through experimental perforation. Quintessence Int 1994; 25(9): 647-9.
7. Cottone J A, Molinari JA. Selection for dental practice of chemical disinfectants and sterilants for hepatitis and AIDS. Aust Dent J 1987; 32: 368-74.
8. Cottone JA, Young JM, Dinyarian P. Disinfection/sterilization protocols recommended by manufactures of impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 1990; 3(4): 379-83.
12. Herrera P, Merchand VA. Dimensional stability of dental impressions after immersion disinfection, J Dent Assoc Am 1986; 113: 419-22.
13- Jennings KJ, Samaranayake LP. The persistence of microorganizms on impression materials following disinfection. Int J Prosthodont 1991; 4(4): 382-7.
14. Langone J. AIDS. Disover 1985; 6: 28-53.
15. Leung R, Schonfeld S. Cypsium casts as a potential soruce of microbial contamination. J Proslhet Dent 1983; 49: 210-11.
16. Lloyd L, Burke LJT. Handicapiece asepsis; a survey of the attitudes of denial practitioners. Br Dent J 1995; 178: 23-7.
17. Mansfield SM, White JM. Antimicrobial effects from incorporation of disinfectants into gypsum casts. Int J Prosthodont I99l;4{2):% 180-5.
18.
Mısırhgi
l A, Nalbant D, Suca S. Laboratuvarlardan gelen protezlerin kontaminasyon derecelerinin araştırılması. G Ü Dişhek Fak Derg 1988; 5 (I): 177-82.
19.
Payz
m S, Özsan K, Ekman H, Fişek N. Sağlık hizmetinde mikrobiyoloji. [.Genel Mikrobiyoloji. A Ü Tıp Fak Yayınları. No.153, A Ü Basımevi, Ankara, 1965; Sayfa 41.
20. Powell G,
Runnell
s R, Whisenant B, Saxon B. The presence and identification of microorganizms transmitted to dental laboratories. Contorol 1989; 4(5): 8.
21. Rowe RHR, Forrest JO. Dental impressions the probability of contamination and a method of disinfection. Br Dent J 1978; 125: 184-6.
22. Schwartz RS, Bradley DV, Hilton TJ, Kruse SK. . Immersion disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7(5): 418-23.
23. Türköz Y, Karaağaçlıoğiu L, Mısırlıgil A. Muhtalif kimyasal protez temizleyici maddelerin protez haklarındaki Candida albicans aktivitesine etkileri. Ank Üniv Diş Hek Fak Der 1988; 15(1): 47-52.
24. Watson OM. Whitehouse RLS, Possibity of cross-contamination between dental patients. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124; 77-9.
9. prermon D, Johnson G. The accuracy of elastomeric impressions disinfected by spray atomization (Abstract No.1354). J Dent Res 1988; 67: 282.
10. Drennon D, Johnson G. The effect of immersion
disinfection of elastomeric impressions on the surface " reproduction of improved gypsiüm casts (Abstrac No. 1356). J Dent Res 1988; 67: 282.
11. Fong PG, Walter JD. The effects of an immersion disinfection regime on rigid impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 1990; 3(6): 522-7.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com