You are here

Home » Content

DÖKÜM KURONLARIN "CORE" MATERYALLERİNE TUTUNMA KUVVETLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

THE STUDY OF CAST CROWNS STRENGTH OF RETENTION TO THE "CORE" MATERIALS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1997

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this research, Cr-Ni cast crowns havebeen cemented with zinc-phosphate to the composite resine, amalgam and cast cores which are beneath, thcrmosiclus is applied to the each of the three groups. The examples have been subjected to the test of retention with Hounsfield tensometer. Statistically it is fixed that the retention values of the three groups are very different at the beginning and that they come close to each other in the course of time.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmada, döküm Cr- Ni kuronlar alttaki kompozit rezin, amalgam ve döküm "core" lara, çinko fosfat siman ile simante edilmiş, her üç gruba da termosiklus uygulanmıştır. Örnekler, Hounsfield'in tensometresiyle tutuculuk testine tabi tutulmuştur. Grupların tuLûcüluk degerlenntn ba|iarıği£ta çok farklı olduğu, zamanla birbirine yaklaştığı, istatistiksel olarak tesbit edilmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-dokum-kuronlarin-core-materyallerine-tutunma-kuvvetlerinin-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 1
53-56
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Barahan Dî. A simplified method for making posts and cores. J Prostliet Dent 1970; 24 (3): 287-97.
2. Capulo AA, Standlee JP, Pins and pasts- Why, When, and How. Dent Clin Nort Am 1976; 20 (2): 299-311,
3. Chan KC, Azarbal P, Kerbcr PE Band strength of cements to crown bases. J Proslhel Dent 1981; 46 (3); 297 9.
4.
Erba
ş OY, Aslan Y, Alpar R, Döküm Cr-Nı kuronlar altındaki amalgam ve döküm Cr-Ni "core" materyallerinin ısı değişimlerine bağlı retansiyon değerlerinin karşılaştırılması. Ora! Derg 1989; ( 61-62,63): 38-42.
5 Ftıjimoto J, Norman RD, Dykcma RW, Phillips RW, A comparison of pin-retained amalgam and composite resin cores. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 39 (5): 512-9.
6 Henry PJ, Bower RC. Post-core systems in crown and Bridge work. Aust Dent J 1977; 22 {19): 46-52.
7, Hormati AA, Denehy GE. Retantion of cast crowns cemented to amalgam and composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 1981; 45 (5): 525-8.
8. Hormati AA, and Denchy GE. Microleakage of pin-retained amalgam and composite resin bases. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 44 (5): 526-30,
9. Hudis SI, Goldstein GR. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55 (I): 33-8.
10. Jendersen MD, Trowbridge HO. Selected physical and biological properties of a zinc polyear boxylate cement, abstracted, IADR Program and Abstracts of papers 1971.
11. Landermerlen JR, and Berry HH. The composite resin post and core. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 28
(5)'. 500-3.
12. Larson TD, Jensen JR. Microleakage of composite resin and amalgam core material under complete cast crowns, J Prosthet Dent 1980; 44 (I): 40 4.
33. Phillips RW. Skinnerfs Science of Dental Materials. Scvent ed. Philadelphia: WB. Saunders Co, 1973: 478- 80.
14. Rose ]A. Composite build up offers advantages in crown procedures. Dent Surv 1972;49 (2): 50-2.
15. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodoniics. Cv Mosby, St Louis, 1988: 198-217,
16. Silverstein WH. The reinforcement weakened pulpless teeth, J Prosthet Dent 1964; 14(2): 372-81.
17. Sorenscn AJ, Martinoff TJ. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: A study of endodontically treated teeth, J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51 (6): 780-4.
18. Standlee JP, Caputo AA. Halcomb J, Trabcrt KC. The retentive and stress distrubiting properties of a ihreatet endodontic dowel. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 44 (4): 398-404.
19. Trabert CK, Caputo AA, Abmi RM. Tooth fracture a comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. JEndodont 1978;4:341-5.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com