You are here

Home » Content

Farklı Doğa Yasaları Görüşleri Üzerine

Different Views of Laws of Nature

Journal Name:

  • Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy

Publication Year:

  • 2017

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
There are roughly two main understanding in philosophy of science: Epistemology of Science and Metaphysics of Science. It is ex-amined that some concept such as Laws of Nature, Causation, Time and Space into the metaphysics of Science. In this paper, it has been studied laws of nature which is one the most important subjects in metaphysics of science. Let’s think outside the box, there are three significant views about laws of nature; Regularity Theory, Necessita-tion Theory and Dispositional Essential views. It has been worked the views of David Lewis in regularity theory. In the section of nomic ne-cessitation we have been scrutinised the arguments put forward by David Armstrong and finally the last section; it has been discussed Al-exander Bird’s views of dispositional essentialism comparing with the other two aspects.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bilim felsefesi çalışmalarında kabaca iki anlayış mevcuttur; Bilimin epistemolojisi ve Bilim metafiziği. Bilim metafiziği alanında doğa yasaları, nedensellik, zaman, uzam gibi kavramlar incelenmektedir. Bu çalışmada bilim metafiziği içindeki önemli konulardan biri olan doğa yasaları incelenmiştir. Büyük çerçeveden bakarsak doğa yasaları ko-nusunda üç önemli bakış açısı vardır; Düzenlilik Teorisi (Regularity Theory), Gereklilik (Nomic Necessitation) ve Fıtratsal Özcülük (Dis-positional Essentialism). Düzenlilik teorisinde David Lewis’in görüşleri incelenmiş, Gereklilik bölümünde David Armstrong’un ileri sürdüğü iddialar irdelenmiş ve son olarak fıtratsal özcülük kısmında ise Alexan-der Bird’ün ifadeleri diğer iki görüş ile karşılaştırılarak tartışılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-farkli-doga-yasalari-gorusleri-uzerine.pdf
  • 1
43
63
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Armstrong, D. (1983). What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bird, A. (1998). Philosophy of Science. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Bird, A. (2004). Antidotes All The Way Down?.Theoria, 19. 259-269.
Bird, A. (2005). The Dispositionalist Conception of Laws. Foundations of Science, 10: 353-370.
Bird, A. (2007). Nature’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, B. & Lierse, C. (1994). Dispositional Essentialism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72: 27-45.
Hume, D. (2007). A Treatise of Human Nature (ed. D. F. Norton & M. J. Norton). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hume, D. (2000). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (ed. T. L. Beau-champ). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.
Lewis, D. (1999). Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Psillos, S. (2002). Causation and Explanation. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Tooley, M. (1977). The Nature of Laws. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 7: 667-698.
Van Fraassen, B. C. (1989). Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/david-lewis/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dispositions/
Yılmaz, M. (2004). Simone de Beauvoir. Felsefe Ansiklopedisi, 2 (ed. A. Cevizci). İstanbul: Etik Yayınları, 214-223.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com